So I gave this a try and have a few questions about it. If you haven't heard if this test method it's somewhere on this site.
Thought it was worth a try.
Basically you take a given powder and bullet combo and load one round increasing by .5-.7 grains until you're are at published max.
Shoot through a chronograph and log fps with each round, the goal is to find 2 rounds with the same or close to same fps.
This is not the end all test, but kinda a starting point to see how the bullet and powder combo work together, they said you don't really have to shoot at paper, cause you're not shooting for accuracy at this point of the test.
So here's what my question; Okay I'm in need of some help.
I really like the idea of shooting less bullets and saving time and money.
I'm shooting a stock Remington 700 bdl 7mm rem mag.
I have been shooting 64 grains of h4831 with 140 grain nosler accubonds velocity is right at 2700 fps and 1/2 " at a 100 yards.
I know I could get this faster, but it's killed deer just fine here in Missouri. I'm happy with this load and I found it using the traditional ocw test.
I was able to snatch up a few pounds of reloader 22 and a couple hundred 160 nosler accubonds and figured I'd like to try this 20 +\- round method out.
Since I enjoy shooting at targets I figured I would shoot at a 1" circle at 75 yards.
The load started at 59.0 grains up to 66.0 grain of re-22 seated at whatever nosler's manual recommended, 3.300" or close to it. I increased the charge weight my .5 grains with each round until I was over .5 published max, which still shows no signs of high pressure btw.
To my surprise all 15 rounds shot inside that circle!!!!
The velocities increased from 2650 upto 2955
But all the bullets are hitting the same place within an inch.
I've never tried this method before and am wanting to get some advice to see if this is normal???
The gun shoots the 140 grain and 160 grain accubonds using diffrent powders and charge weights at almost the same poi.
I'm super excited hoping that I may have stumbled upon a resilient load.
Any and all advice is greatly appreciated.
Regards.
George.
I'm doing this on my phone so any typos I apologize
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Thought it was worth a try.
Basically you take a given powder and bullet combo and load one round increasing by .5-.7 grains until you're are at published max.
Shoot through a chronograph and log fps with each round, the goal is to find 2 rounds with the same or close to same fps.
This is not the end all test, but kinda a starting point to see how the bullet and powder combo work together, they said you don't really have to shoot at paper, cause you're not shooting for accuracy at this point of the test.
So here's what my question; Okay I'm in need of some help.
I really like the idea of shooting less bullets and saving time and money.
I'm shooting a stock Remington 700 bdl 7mm rem mag.
I have been shooting 64 grains of h4831 with 140 grain nosler accubonds velocity is right at 2700 fps and 1/2 " at a 100 yards.
I know I could get this faster, but it's killed deer just fine here in Missouri. I'm happy with this load and I found it using the traditional ocw test.
I was able to snatch up a few pounds of reloader 22 and a couple hundred 160 nosler accubonds and figured I'd like to try this 20 +\- round method out.
Since I enjoy shooting at targets I figured I would shoot at a 1" circle at 75 yards.
The load started at 59.0 grains up to 66.0 grain of re-22 seated at whatever nosler's manual recommended, 3.300" or close to it. I increased the charge weight my .5 grains with each round until I was over .5 published max, which still shows no signs of high pressure btw.
To my surprise all 15 rounds shot inside that circle!!!!
The velocities increased from 2650 upto 2955
But all the bullets are hitting the same place within an inch.
I've never tried this method before and am wanting to get some advice to see if this is normal???
The gun shoots the 140 grain and 160 grain accubonds using diffrent powders and charge weights at almost the same poi.
I'm super excited hoping that I may have stumbled upon a resilient load.
Any and all advice is greatly appreciated.
Regards.
George.
I'm doing this on my phone so any typos I apologize
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk