Re: 30-06 vs .308
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Falar</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Nightwatch</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Falar</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Nightwatch</div><div class="ubbcode-body">www.snipercountry.com/articles/accuracyfacts.asp I personally like the 308. it can be a personal choice too though. </div></div>
Is this a joke or are you actually citing that as if it meant something?</div></div>
What about it its a good article. </div></div>
With no facts, just reposted heresay. That site is a joke anyway. Test them side by side for yourself and you will see that there is no difference. </div></div>
The author of that article is also one of the primary reasons that people are afraid to use 416R in cold weather environments. He claims reduced fatigue capability (which is correct) except that it doesn't appear that he has any kind of understanding what constitutes the "high cycle fatigue" that is actually affected.
Careful what you read on the internet, especially when there aren't any hard numbers to support the opinions of the author.
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Falar</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Nightwatch</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Falar</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Nightwatch</div><div class="ubbcode-body">www.snipercountry.com/articles/accuracyfacts.asp I personally like the 308. it can be a personal choice too though. </div></div>
Is this a joke or are you actually citing that as if it meant something?</div></div>
What about it its a good article. </div></div>
With no facts, just reposted heresay. That site is a joke anyway. Test them side by side for yourself and you will see that there is no difference. </div></div>
The author of that article is also one of the primary reasons that people are afraid to use 416R in cold weather environments. He claims reduced fatigue capability (which is correct) except that it doesn't appear that he has any kind of understanding what constitutes the "high cycle fatigue" that is actually affected.
Careful what you read on the internet, especially when there aren't any hard numbers to support the opinions of the author.