Ok, so I have a newish 300 blackout build that I loaded up some subsonic loads for. But before that, I took several factory offerings (subs and supers) and ran them through the gun just for function check. Everything but the Hornady black 208gr Amax subsonic cycled fine (2 of 5 short-stroked and did not pick up the next round). Hornady black and the remington 220gr OTM subsonic both failed to lock on an empty mag.
Fast forward a few weeks and I have a 5x5 load test for hornady 208 and 220 gr BTHPs using Accurate 1680 powder. I still had the hornady black so I used that as a baseline for speed testing. The max was 1061, min was 1029, SD was 14 with an ES of 32 fps. The last shot of this string clocked at 1060 on my magnetospeed and did not lock the action back on the empty magazine.
Ok, this is what I find odd, and maybe those more knowledgeable can 'splain me this...
The 208 gr BTPHs locked the action back on an empty mag with measured velocities of 801, 872, 971, 1006, and 1065 fps. The 220 gr BTHPs locked the action on an empty mag with measured velocities of 772, 797, 866, 933, and 976 fps.
Don't get me wrong, I'm glad that the firearm is cycling with the anemic loads, but it seems odd to me that the factory subs consistently cause malfunctions at higher velocity (and I would assume pressure) than the hand loaded ammunition. Anyway, I'd love to hear your musings on this.
In case you are wondering why I have not listed powder weights for the velocities; in my excitement to make up the loads, I did not record the charges in my reloading book. The scrap of paper I used is lost to time, though the entry where I was going to enter the charges in my book remains. Oh well, back to square 1...
Fast forward a few weeks and I have a 5x5 load test for hornady 208 and 220 gr BTHPs using Accurate 1680 powder. I still had the hornady black so I used that as a baseline for speed testing. The max was 1061, min was 1029, SD was 14 with an ES of 32 fps. The last shot of this string clocked at 1060 on my magnetospeed and did not lock the action back on the empty magazine.
Ok, this is what I find odd, and maybe those more knowledgeable can 'splain me this...
The 208 gr BTPHs locked the action back on an empty mag with measured velocities of 801, 872, 971, 1006, and 1065 fps. The 220 gr BTHPs locked the action on an empty mag with measured velocities of 772, 797, 866, 933, and 976 fps.
Don't get me wrong, I'm glad that the firearm is cycling with the anemic loads, but it seems odd to me that the factory subs consistently cause malfunctions at higher velocity (and I would assume pressure) than the hand loaded ammunition. Anyway, I'd love to hear your musings on this.
In case you are wondering why I have not listed powder weights for the velocities; in my excitement to make up the loads, I did not record the charges in my reloading book. The scrap of paper I used is lost to time, though the entry where I was going to enter the charges in my book remains. Oh well, back to square 1...