Hey everyone, i understand there are hundreds of threads out there regarding each of these rounds listed above. I would like the opinion of those when in direct comparison with a few stipulations. There are several parts to my post here so hang in there and hope to keep everyone interested and engaged in all topics.
I am breaching into the long range game and just can't seem to get enough of it. I have a 224 valkyrie, 6mm creedmoor, and now looking at reaching out a little farther to accurately AND consistently be able to hit a target 1700-2000yards. From what I have read, the 300wm and .338L seem to have very close ballistics to one another. .338 offers higher BC on their projectiles but the 300wm offers a flatter trajectory while still offering a fairly high BC selection on their projectiles. While i do not see myself taking down large game at 2000yd any time soon, am I safe to assume that the major difference between the two cartridges is the stopping power at distance (relatively speaking)?
Am I correct in thinking that really the only other MAJOR difference between the two cartridges is the cost of ammo & reloading supplies? All things considered, the difference between the two comes down to stopping power at distance and cost of ammo between. (correct me if i am wrong)
While i was rooting for the .338 to get my vote at the start of my journey to gain knowlege on the ballistics, after researching the cartridges, it seems like i should go with a 300wm becasue 1) more companies offer firearms chambered in 300wm, and 2) ammo availability and cost.
Lastly, I do not have extremely deep pockets but am looking for the best value/accuracy ratio. i do not mind spending a little extra money to get a superior product but I am a value chaser. (i said value not budget) if i can save $1000 to get a rifle that shoots .5moa vs a .35moa, I am all over that deal. Am i safe in deciding to go after a bergara or savage chambered in 300wm or are there other rifles that offer quality products and manufacture results that "should not" be created from a production rifle? Again, please correct me if i am wrong, but i am looking for reasonable responses backed by some sort of logic or thought process... not just a simple brand loyalty answer that is not based on any facts or logic.
My rough budget for the rifle alone is up to 2k ( but would like to see what options are offered around $1k if the accuracy is still fairly decent). I currently have a vortex razor gen2 4.5-27 on my 6mm creedmoor I would most likely swap onto this rifle. I plan to shoot every few weeks at a 2k yd range near me. And i realistically do not think i will ever shoot game passed 600 yards, however my parents own some land that I may occasionally hunt elk on. Elk will probably be the largest game i shoot, but want to focus more-so on target/steel shooting.
Thanks in advance and i look forward to reading your responses.
I am breaching into the long range game and just can't seem to get enough of it. I have a 224 valkyrie, 6mm creedmoor, and now looking at reaching out a little farther to accurately AND consistently be able to hit a target 1700-2000yards. From what I have read, the 300wm and .338L seem to have very close ballistics to one another. .338 offers higher BC on their projectiles but the 300wm offers a flatter trajectory while still offering a fairly high BC selection on their projectiles. While i do not see myself taking down large game at 2000yd any time soon, am I safe to assume that the major difference between the two cartridges is the stopping power at distance (relatively speaking)?
Am I correct in thinking that really the only other MAJOR difference between the two cartridges is the cost of ammo & reloading supplies? All things considered, the difference between the two comes down to stopping power at distance and cost of ammo between. (correct me if i am wrong)
While i was rooting for the .338 to get my vote at the start of my journey to gain knowlege on the ballistics, after researching the cartridges, it seems like i should go with a 300wm becasue 1) more companies offer firearms chambered in 300wm, and 2) ammo availability and cost.
Lastly, I do not have extremely deep pockets but am looking for the best value/accuracy ratio. i do not mind spending a little extra money to get a superior product but I am a value chaser. (i said value not budget) if i can save $1000 to get a rifle that shoots .5moa vs a .35moa, I am all over that deal. Am i safe in deciding to go after a bergara or savage chambered in 300wm or are there other rifles that offer quality products and manufacture results that "should not" be created from a production rifle? Again, please correct me if i am wrong, but i am looking for reasonable responses backed by some sort of logic or thought process... not just a simple brand loyalty answer that is not based on any facts or logic.
My rough budget for the rifle alone is up to 2k ( but would like to see what options are offered around $1k if the accuracy is still fairly decent). I currently have a vortex razor gen2 4.5-27 on my 6mm creedmoor I would most likely swap onto this rifle. I plan to shoot every few weeks at a 2k yd range near me. And i realistically do not think i will ever shoot game passed 600 yards, however my parents own some land that I may occasionally hunt elk on. Elk will probably be the largest game i shoot, but want to focus more-so on target/steel shooting.
Thanks in advance and i look forward to reading your responses.
Last edited: