Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thanks. I was just curious how yours compared to my 155 load. I was one of the early adopters of 8208 because I couldn't find Varget. Now you can't find either one42.7 but this is with 175 RDF which I believe has a shorter baring than SMK.
IDK
You’re lying then
Care to provide some data that shows he’s wrong, rather than cluttering up the thread with trolling BS? I like to see data in technical threads, not ad hominem attacks with no substance. Thanks!![]()
The caveat isn't usually thats its not possible, but that its not possible while staying inside safe recommend pressures.Yeah that's really pushing it for sure. I'm just saying in response to this post, if it was possible to do it with a 208, the 175 class bullets the OP wants should be able to get there.
People who know what they’re doing dont think im trolling.
He put a max charge of the fastest burning powder recommended for that bullet weight into a thick heavy military case. That particular charge was developed in the thinnest case on the market. If you put that charge in a LC case, youll drive pressures through the roof, especially because xbr is fast burning for that application.
What he did is retarded and dangerous. And people like you who dont understand how case volume affects pressure are just eating it up. So go do some research on the subject before posting anymore ignorance.
Retarded and dangerous?
I have used this load for almost 3 years.
There have been NO ill effects in my rifle.
I think you paint with a broad brush?
Thats not to say your wrong in any way!
I guess I didn't explain my loads the way I should have?
I have a pretty long jump even with my coal of 2.850 I still have .100 jump with the RDF also I can insert the bullet into the case filled with 42.7 grains of 8208 to a coal of 2.75" . So from my stand point I'm neither retarded or dangerous!
Should I have stated this on a public forum? Probably not but to say its not possible to get a 2650 as the OP was wanting is not true either.
If I seat the bullet deeper as stated that gives me a .10 more volume then add another .10 of jump to the lands and I'm not pushing the envelope!
In fact I was having a hard time with the rifle not cycling with lighter starting loads.
Sorry!
For what its worth, this is what GRT puts out for the load being debated. Puts him at 64,000psi, while spicy and technically over charged. Its not gunna blow up the gun and with strong primers should only show flattened primers as a pressure sigh. I know im comfortable running my 308 up to 65,000psi before my butt starts to pucker(proof load for 308 is 75,275psi). So I'd say this load is plausible, albeit deffinatly qualifying under the +p Category. Lets try and keep it civil here talk with the data.The rdf is 1.35” long to the SMK being 1.25”, so its .100” longer. You seating the RDF to 2.850” is still seating it deeper than the SMK at 2.800”. You are doing this in a LC case having 2 grains less case volume than the Winchester case. If your powder charge makes 61,000PSI in a Winchester case, its making well in excess of 70000 in a LC case. And this is with XBR of all powders, probably the most unforgiving combination for the 308. I have LC LR brass. I know how it handles pressure.
You’ve using this for 3 years? Lol!
My only issue is with the R700 Short Action im limited to 2.840 if i want it to feed in the magazine.Not right . From a 2.850 I'm still jumping
.10 to the lands with the rdf. Doesn't matter the length, what does matter is the profile of the particular bullet.
The baring surface is shorter.
There's a lot to be considered when working up a load with any powder.My only issue is with the R700 Short Action im limited to 2.840 if i want it to feed in the magazine.
If you haven’t already done so, try 24.8-25g of AA2520 with 77 smks in a lake city case, R7-1/2 primer: basically a clone of mk262 mod 1. Shoots .75-1.0 moa in my mod 1 and 1.5 or so in my carbines.I've had great results with accurate 2520 shooting a 175smk. I do use lapua brass though. Happy to share the load data
I will do that. I have 75gr bthp Hornady though for 223 and I've been running 25.2gr of TAC for that one and had very good results, but I've only run it in my bolt gun. On the list (which has grown considerably of late since swapping some guns /barrels/actions around), is to work up a load for my CLE precision AR. I have lapua brass but I have been strongly considering getting some LC brass for that gun and keeping the lapua for bolt gun only.If you haven’t already done so, try 24.8-25g of AA2520 with 77 smks in a lake city case, R7-1/2 primer: basically a clone of mk262 mod 1. Shoots .75-1.0 moa in my mod 1 and 1.5 or so in my carbines.
Id love for you to share your 2520 load data for the 175's. I'v been using 25.2 grains of 2520 for my mk262 clone.I've had great results with accurate 2520 shooting a 175smk. I do use lapua brass though. Happy to share the load data
308 bolt gun- BMP - ss bemchmark or Hawk hill- 22" / 1:10T.Id love for you to share your 2520 load data for the 175's. I'v been using 25.2 grains of 2520 for my mk262 clone.
Sorry, just seeing this. Not my picture but heavy ejector mark similar to the case on top. No blown primers. Should’ve started lower, just used a round that’s fine in my bolt 308 in a new AR.What are we defining as "high" pressure signs? Flattening primers or you punching em and stretching the cases?
I always kind of wonder how big of a deal flat primers are? Seems like some actions produce that even when the pressure isn't what you'd think it would be. I'm not a risk taker with ammo loading though.Sorry, just seeing this. Not my picture but heavy ejector mark similar to the case on top. No blown primers. Should’ve started lower, just used a round that’s fine in my bolt 308 in a new AR.
View attachment 7848229
I was getting 2650fps out of 18” barrel FAL and 20”rem 700 with 175smk 46.2 gr CFE223 GMM primers in M118 cases jumping 10 thousands to the lands. Even in the lands had no overpressure signs on the primers. Best powder for .308 5.56 8mm Mauser 30.30 I’ve ever used. Very low sd and not very temp sensitive. I’m about to try lovex 73.4 to clone this same round . I guess its shootersHowdy all, Im looking to push a 175gr SMK to 2650fps out of a 20" Remington 700 short action so my ACSS Apollo BDC is accurate past 800yds. Bit of an ask out of an 20" I know but i believe its doable. My question is has anyone produced loads that replicate the performance I'm looking for? According to GRT Lever Evolution and BL-C(2) are my prime candidates. I don't entirely trust GRT yet so im looking for some real world input?
Loads im looking at on GRT for a 2.005 case length, 2.83 overall length, 55.4H2O case capacity.
LeverEvolution at 45.8 grains puts it at 2650 at 57,000psi
BL-C(2) at 46.8 grains puts it at 2644 at 61,000psi
Now Hodgdon lists their max charge for BL-C(2) at 46.0 grains for a 175 grain projectile. As you can tell the GRT Load is a little spicier than that(should go without saying to start lower and work up). As for LeverEvolution my only issue with it is temperature sensitivity. Some other options i've considered are Varget, H4895 and IMR4064 (pressure curves look a little sketchy for the 4064 according to GRT at 70k psi for 2650 out of a 20) but iv heard thats whats used for the M118LR round so who knows. Again Would love to see if anyone has pushed a 175 grain out ofa 20" 308 at 2650 or better and if so how did you do it? Thanks!
I was jumping .30 to the lands in the FALI was getting 2650fps out of 18” barrel FAL and 20”rem 700 with 175smk 46.2 gr CFE223 GMM primers in M118 cases jumping 10 thousands to the lands. Even in the lands had no overpressure signs on the primers. Best powder for .308 5.56 8mm Mauser 30.30 I’ve ever used. Very low sd and not very temp sensitive. I’m about to try lovex 73.4 to clone this same round . I guess its shooters
Thanks for these velocity numbers. I cant tell you how long ive tried to find a real 1st hand account of this....I dont have a chronograph and cant afford one that would be worth a darn, so im holding off a while. 42.2-42.5 and a little bit of seating depth play sounds like a great place to end up with the 175's. I will work up but just having some real velocity numbers is great. My barrel has a 1-10 twist , most of are these days it seemsOut of my 20" Remington LTR shooting 175 SMK I got 2574 with 42.2 IMR 4064, 2507 with 44.5 Varget, and 2569 with 42.7. Best group was 1-1/2" @ 300 with the 4064 load.