308 winchester with heavy VLD bullets

davisdewald

Private
Full Member
Minuteman
Feb 3, 2014
6
0
hello everyone

I am new to the site and wanted to get some of your input on something I have been thinking about. I am having my first custom gun built and will be ready in April. I wanted to get some loads made up to experiment with when the rifle is ready. My rifle is going to be a tactical style rifle that I will be using at the range and hunting with as well. It is a 308 win built around a defiance deviant action and benchmark 20 inch barrel with a 1 to 10 twist. I like to shoot heavy bullets. I have been reloading now for a few years but haven't had any experience with the 308 cartridge. I was thinking the 190 or 210 vlds. My question is has anybody tried anything similar? What kind of velocities do you get? What components do yall use that work well with a similar set up? Also, the deviant action is cut for AW mags and I just picked up 2 of them. I know those VLD bullets like being right up on the rifling. Do you think the COAL will be too long for the AW mags? If they are how much of a difference in accuracy will I see if I seat them a little deeper to fit in the mag?

Any input yall can give will be greatly appreciated. Thanks
 
Last edited:
In my experience the VLD's like to be soft seated or run at least.020" off the lands. This is going to be tough to get in the magazine. A 185 hybrid can easily be stuffed to mag length and run fine. You will have to do some testing with the short barrel. All the lad info I have is for a longer barrel and would be a waste of powder for you. I would start at around 41 grains of Varget type powder and work up.
As always YMMV- Rob
 
Thanks for the input Ol Rob. I think Im gonna get the VLD 190s and 210s and the AMAX 178s and 208s and seat them as shallow as I can but still fit in the AW mag. Then just see which ones group the best. Thanks again
 
I have shot the 208 amax extensively in a 308 bolt gun and it is an amazing round. If you use CFE223 powder you can get some amazing velocity out of the heavies and will buck wind way better than a 175-178gr variety.
 
I haven't gotten around to the 208 Amax yet but find the 185 Berger VLDs and the 190 SMK do work better for the longer stuff than the 175s. I'm using Alpha II mags so I can seat my bullets out a little farther and that helps with the VLDs however my favorite bullet so far (and I can't find them right now) is the Berger 185 BTHP long range. Great BC and very accurate out of my rifle with a 44.0 charge of Varget.
 
In my experience the VLD's like to be soft seated or run at least.020" off the lands.

My experience is quite the contrary with VLD's, they hate to jump. My best accuracy with them has been seating the bullet so when chambered they are snug in the lands.

Obviously not easy in a gas gun or a gun where you are limited to a certain mag length and have a chamber with a throat that exceeds the length of the mag. This is where a long action 308 really helps when using long, heavy bullets.

Then one day I got a wild hair and decided to build a 30-06 match rifle... More powder, longer bullets... I'll tell you, I will never go back to a bolt action 308...
 
My experience is quite the contrary with VLD's, they hate to jump. My best accuracy with them has been seating the bullet so when chambered they are snug in the lands.

Obviously not easy in a gas gun or a gun where you are limited to a certain mag length and have a chamber with a throat that exceeds the length of the mag. This is where a long action 308 really helps when using long, heavy bullets.

Then one day I got a wild hair and decided to build a 30-06 match rifle... More powder, longer bullets... I'll tell you, I will never go back to a bolt action 308...


IMHO, by the time you go for a 06 you might as well just build a 300wm same 30cal bullets, way more powder and lots more energy :)
 
For the guys pushing the heavy 308 bullets hard, whats your brass life like? My experience with the 208's was that I was wreaking lapua brass after 3-4 firing compared to 15-20 firings from a stiff 178gr load. Perhaps it was something else I did or maybe I was just pushing them too hard?
 
hello everyone

I am new to the site and wanted to get some of your input on something I have been thinking about. I am having my first custom gun built and will be ready in April. I wanted to get some loads made up to experiment with when the rifle is ready. My rifle is going to be a tactical style rifle that I will be using at the range and hunting with as well. It is a 308 win built around a defiance deviant action and benchmark 20 inch barrel with a 1 to 10 twist. I like to shoot heavy bullets. I have been reloading now for a few years but haven't had any experience with the 308 cartridge. I was thinking the 190 or 210 vlds. My question is has anybody tried anything similar? What kind of velocities do you get? What components do yall use that work well with a similar set up? Also, the deviant action is cut for AW mags and I just picked up 2 of them. I know those VLD bullets like being right up on the rifling. Do you think the COAL will be too long for the AW mags? If they are how much of a difference in accuracy will I see if I seat them a little deeper to fit in the mag?

Any input yall can give will be greatly appreciated. Thanks

How much freebore in chamber?

VLDs do just fine with 0.040" (or more) of jump, I've gotten too many rifles to shoot really well jumping VLDs to believe otherwise.

No way to answer your question w/o knowing what the freebore dimension is.
 
VLDs do just fine with 0.040" (or more) of jump, I've gotten too many rifles to shoot really well jumping VLDs to believe otherwise.

Maybe it is the difference between really well and extremely well. What may be acceptable to you may not be acceptable to someone else. I have never, ever, no matter what gun I have used been able to shoot a VLD with a jump better than a SMK... I have never, ever, been able to shoot a SMK without a jump as good a I can shoot a VLD without one.

Berger admitted the VLD's were very jump sensitive and as far as I am aware that is the reason they developed the hybrids.

IMHO, by the time you go for a 06 you might as well just build a 300wm same 30cal bullets, way more powder and lots more energy

I have one of those also but it is too expensive to feed. Reminds me of my son when he was 19. If I am going to pay to feed something like that, I will shoot my 338, it is a lot more fun for the buck.

It is pretty easy to get your hands on some of that 1960's LC Match and National Match brass for a 30-06 at a good price and that stuff is ALMOST as good as lapua in quality, just does not last quite as long. In fact I just finished processing 500 1963 NM brass I got off of gunbroker for $142. Try to find really good 300 win mag brass for .30 apiece. Plus I only get maybe 4-5 firings out of 300 win mag brass where I can get 10 easy out of my 30-06.

I am not bad mouthing a 308 by any means, I love my 308 AR's.. but to me that is where a 308 belongs, in an AR. If you are going to build a bolt gun, and don't shoot in any matches where you are required to shoot one, there are a lot better options than a 308.
 
Maybe it is the difference between really well and extremely well. What may be acceptable to you may not be acceptable to someone else. I have never, ever, no matter what gun I have used been able to shoot a VLD with a jump better than a SMK... I have never, ever, been able to shoot a SMK without a jump as good a I can shoot a VLD without one.

Berger admitted the VLD's were very jump sensitive and as far as I am aware that is the reason they developed the hybrids.

Maybe at 100, maybe, that is the case with SMKs shooting better than VLDs.

Berger suggests jumping VLDs. You've drank too much of the Berger VLDs are jump sensitive Kool-aid, believe too much of internet "truth".
http://www.bergerbullets.com/getting-the-best-precision-and-accuracy-from-vld-bullets-in-your-rifle/

Seems to me you found your conformational bias and ran with it. I suspect your loading skills, combined with your conformational bias, are limiting factor to making VLDs shoot well. Long before the write up by Eric / Bryan I've had VLDs shooting well from many a rifle.
"...I have never, ever, no matter what gun I have used been able to shoot a VLD with a jump better than a SMK...", just because your abilities fall short on making VLDs shoot well does not mean others have same limits.
 
Last edited:
I have one of those also but it is too expensive to feed. Reminds me of my son when he was 19. If I am going to pay to feed something like that, I will shoot my 338, it is a lot more fun for the buck.

It is pretty easy to get your hands on some of that 1960's LC Match and National Match brass for a 30-06 at a good price and that stuff is ALMOST as good as lapua in quality, just does not last quite as long. In fact I just finished processing 500 1963 NM brass I got off of gunbroker for $142. Try to find really good 300 win mag brass for .30 apiece. Plus I only get maybe 4-5 firings out of 300 win mag brass where I can get 10 easy out of my 30-06.

I am not bad mouthing a 308 by any means, I love my 308 AR's.. but to me that is where a 308 belongs, in an AR. If you are going to build a bolt gun, and don't shoot in any matches where you are required to shoot one, there are a lot better options than a 308.


I had a 338 Lapua and sold it cause shooting was way more expensive. I am not sure where you are getting that shooting a 300wm is even close to shooting a 338 Lapua. Brass for a 338 is around $2-2.50 to start. Your typical bullet if you can find them is around $0.80, powder is gonna cost you $0.45 per bullet, we'll call primers a wash. If we divided the cost of the brass over 6 firings we are talking still costing you about $1.50-1.70 every time you pull the trigger. The 300wm is no where close to that. I can easily find brass for around the $0.30-0.4 mark, 208 amax is $0.35 per pill, and powder will be $0.35 per bullet. If we divided the brass over same 6 firings we are talking about costing $0.75 to shoot so it is pretty much half compared to a 338.
 
My .308 match load is 45 Varget in Lapua brass with a JLK 180 VLD LBT. That's 2740fps with a (verified, not advertised) .580BC bullet.

It runs 2.925 OAL, so you need to take the spacers out of your AICS mags, but they fit just fine in AW mags.
 
My vld's are usually .025-.040" off the rifling. Granted they are 105 gr 6 mm, i have noticed that the 105 hybrids prefer a closer jump(.010-.015). My experience is with 5 different 243s and 3 6mmbr's. All have no problem shooting groups in the .1s-.3s@100 and 1/4-1/2 moa out to 1k.
 
308 winchester with heavy VLD bullets

Graham: How far off/into lands are you setting your JLKs please?
.005 off the lands. Might work for you; or might not. My advice is to measure the distance case head to ogive to the lands, then load so that the round ejects properly without pulling the bullet. Start there.
 
Last edited:
I had a 338 Lapua and sold it cause shooting was way more expensive. I am not sure where you are getting that shooting a 300wm is even close to shooting a 338 Lapua. Brass for a 338 is around $2-2.50 to start. Your typical bullet if you can find them is around $0.80, powder is gonna cost you $0.45 per bullet, we'll call primers a wash. If we divided the cost of the brass over 6 firings we are talking still costing you about $1.50-1.70 every time you pull the trigger. The 300wm is no where close to that. I can easily find brass for around the $0.30-0.4 mark, 208 amax is $0.35 per pill, and powder will be $0.35 per bullet. If we divided the brass over same 6 firings we are talking about costing $0.75 to shoot so it is pretty much half compared to a 338.

First, I don't have a problem finding Lapua 338 brass here on the hide, once fired for 1.00 to 1.50 a case and have purchased about 600 off the hide in the last 3 months. When I see it cheap, I buy it. Since Lapua brass is so consistent lot to lot, I never have an issue with different case weights from Lapua. If you shoot as much as I do, you learn real quick how to buy components right if you want to save any money or to be able to afford to shoot 300 rounds a week.

Now it is near impossible to find BULK once fired 300WM cases that are of a single head stamp, when you find it for .30 to .40 cents a case it is usually mixed headstamp range brass. I have no interest in that garbage because the case capacity varies from manufacturer to manufacturer and I am not going to develop loads for a bunch of various case capacities. Range brass is for shooters that don't care about accuracy or are turning 223 into 300 Blackout where it does not *really* matter what case you use.

The only range brass I will consider using is lake city 308/30-06 from military auctions or military match surplus since single year lots are fairly consistent, 50BMG Lake City for my Barrett because accuracy is not an issue with an M82A1 that is a 2 MOA gun on the best of days, and I was lucky enough to get 2500 mk248 300 win mag for .35 cents a case but that stuff is as rare as hens teeth to consider it a reliable option for my 300 WM.

300 win mag brass does not last anywhere near as long as 338 Lapua brass does. In a good chamber, dies to match, and proper annealing you can easily get 15 to 20 reloads from Lapua 338 brass. You can not do that in 300 Win mag. The brass is too thin, 5 loads is about the rule before I sell them to the local scrap yard for .97 a pound.

300 grain 338 Berger OTM's cost me .65 each from powder valley and the same off the shelf locally. I get about 600 rounds out of 8 pounds of powder so my average cost per charge is about .25. Primers are .04 so added all together it is about $1.10 a shot when you factor in case wear.

If I buy new 300WM brass in bulk to have cases that come from the same lot, they are still over a dollar a case, and since I get maybe maybe 5 loads... that is .25 for brass wear, .48 for a comparable 30 caliber Berger bullet, and the powder is .20, and the primer is .04... add that up you have .97 cents a round in 300 WM...

So a big savings of .13 a shot....

If all I am saving is 13 cents a shot, I would much rather shoot a 338 than a 300 WM because the extra "fun" is worth .13 a round. And that was my point, if you are willing to spend AROUND a dollar a round, you get more out of shooting a 338 than a 300 WM.
 
Last edited:
Maybe at 100, maybe, that is the case with SMKs shooting better than VLDs.

Berger suggests jumping VLDs. You've drank too much of the Berger VLDs are jump sensitive Kool-aid, believe too much of internet "truth".
http://www.bergerbullets.com/getting...in-your-rifle/

Seems to me you found your conformational bias and ran with it. I suspect your loading skills, combined with your conformational bias, are limiting factor to making VLDs shoot well. Long before the write up by Eric / Bryan I've had VLDs shooting well from many a rifle.
"...I have never, ever, no matter what gun I have used been able to shoot a VLD with a jump better than a SMK...", just because your abilities fall short on making VLDs shoot well does not mean others have same limits.

Have you seen that video from the guy at Berger that explained why they developed the hybrids?

Actually VLD's are my go-to bullet, I shoot them 10 to 1 vrs Sierra. There is no Kool-aide drinking going on here. I have literally shot tens of thousands of them at various distances off the lands and they shoot best snug up against the lands to .005 off. I have plenty of experience shooting them and my best accuracy with them has been with no to very little jump and I have all the targets and load info to prove it.

Anytime you are in my neighborhood, give me a call, come over and look at my targets and load data. Its all there. I have every paper target for every round fired through my match quality guns that were aimed at paper.

If my experience does not correlate with yours then I don't know what to tell you, but I do know I am not the only one in this camp.

Here is a Video where Bryan Litz from Berger talks about depth sensitivity of the different profiles.



While we are on the subject of observations... I also find the condescending comments you made in your post to be pretty ignorant.
 
Last edited:
My hunting load I took to Africa (and will be using here too) is:
Winchester Brass
CCI 200 Primer
190gr Berger VLD Hunting
42.5gr RL15

I got 2525fps at the muzzle with no pressure signs. This was out of my 1-11tw DTA SRS, and during the ladder test I put four rounds (all different charge weights) into a group that had ~.75" vertical and ~1.25" horizontal spread at 300yds. I wasn't paying attention to wind either! You can shoot the heavies very well out of the 308win
 
Have you seen that video from the guy at Berger that explained why they developed the hybrids?

Actually VLD's are my go-to bullet, I shoot them 10 to 1 vrs Sierra. There is no Kool-aide drinking going on here. I have literally shot tens of thousands of them at various distances off the lands and they shoot best snug up against the lands to .005 off. I have plenty of experience shooting them and my best accuracy with them has been with no to very little jump and I have all the targets and load info to prove it.

Anytime you are in my neighborhood, give me a call, come over and look at my targets and load data. Its all there. I have every paper target for every round fired through my match quality guns that were aimed at paper.

If my experience does not correlate with yours then I don't know what to tell you, but I do know I am not the only one in this camp.

Here is a Video where Bryan Litz from Berger talks about depth sensitivity of the different profiles.



While we are on the subject of observations... I also find the condescending comments you made in your post to be pretty ignorant.


If I find myself in FL I'll give you a call, we'll look at targets and load data. However, doesn't really change anything. You like to put VLDs on or very near lands, if it works for you run it.

However, I do doubt your advice to OP as I and many others in the "jump'em" camp have had plenty of success getting VLDs to shoot plenty tight with 0.040" jump (give or take depending on what your rifle likes). If OP is unable to put VLD close to lands, my original comment was geared such that he shouldn't give up on VLDs and should try them with some jump. I gave up having VLDs just kissing lands or very small jump about a decade back when my experimentation showed I didn't give up any accuracy and reduced work load of chasing lands.

I've heard the theory and explanation that was given on why the hybrid was designed. I've also heard plenty of disinformation over the years or in other words, tell people what they want to hear so it makes it more palatable. VLDs had/have a "reputation" of needing to be just off/just kissing/just into lands to shoot well, which in my experience is not true. Make the hybrid, tell guys it is jump tolerant and avoid discussions like we are having on what is required to make VLDs shoot well. There are some other reasons but those delve off into even less relevant tangents to the OPs original question.

Bottom line, there are two camps: 1) Jump'em 2) Jam or minimal jump. Both camps have success stories, groups and load data to support their claim.
Berger website "Getting the Best Precision and Accuracy from VLDs in your rifle". You seem to be a little too eager to discount the information from Eric @ Berger on how to get the most from VLDs.

"...We scratched our heads about this for awhile until we started getting feedback from hunters who were competition shooters as well. Many were the same guys who were telling us for years that the VLDs shoot great when jumped. Since a much larger number of shooters were using the VLD bullets with a jump we started comparing all the feedback and have discovered the common characteristics in successful reports which gave us the information needed to get VLD working in your rifle. We were able to relay these characteristics to several shooters who were struggling with VLD bullets. Each shooter reported success after applying our recommendation..."

"...Solution

The following has been verified by numerous shooters in many rifles using bullets of different calibers and weights. It is consistent for all VLD bullets. What has been discovered is that VLD bullets shoot best when loaded to a COAL that puts the bullet in a “sweet spot”. This sweet spot is a band .030 to .040 wide and is located anywhere between jamming the bullets into the lands and .150 jump off the lands.

Note: When discussing jam and jump I am referring to the distance from the area of the bearing surface that engages the rifling and the rifling itself. There are many products that allow you to measure these critical dimensions. Some are better than others. I won’t be going into the methods of measuring jam and jump. If you are not familiar with this aspect of reloading it is critically important that you understand this concept before you attempt this test.

Many reloaders feel (and I tend to agree) that meaningful COAL adjustments are .002 to .005. Every once in a while I might adjust the COAL by .010 but this seems like I am moving the bullet the length of a football field. The only way a shooter will be able to benefit from this situation is to let go of this opinion that more than .010 change is too much (me included).

Trying to find the COAL that puts you in the sweet spot by moving .002 to .010 will take so long the barrel may be worn out by the time you sort it out if you don’t give up first. Since the sweet spot is .030 to .040 wide we recommend that you conduct the following test to find your rifles VLD sweet spot.

Load 24 rounds at the following COAL if you are a target competition shooter who does not worry about jamming a bullet:
1. .010 into (touching) the lands (jam) 6 rounds
2. .040 off the lands (jump) 6 rounds
3. .080 off the lands (jump) 6 rounds
4. .120 off the lands (jump) 6 rounds

Load 24 rounds at the following COAL if you are a hunter (pulling a bullet out of the case with your rifling while in the field can be a hunt ending event which must be avoided) or a competition shooter who worries about pulling a bullet during a match:
1. .010 off the lands (jump) 6 rounds
2. .050 off the lands (jump) 6 rounds
3. .090 off the lands (jump) 6 rounds
4. .130 off the lands (jump) 6 rounds

Shoot 2 (separate) 3 shot groups in fair conditions to see how they group. The remarkable reality of this test is that one of these 4 COALs will outperform the other three by a considerable margin. Once you know which one of these 4 COAL shoots best then you can tweak the COAL +/- .002 or .005. Taking the time to set this test up will pay off when you find that your rifle is capable of shooting the VLD bullets very well (even at 100 yards)."

Until we know the OPs chamber dimensions, there is no way to begin to answer the question. However, OP won't truly know if VLDs will or will not shoot from his rifle until he tries them. How OPs rifle shoots the VLDs is the final answer, either rifle shoots VLD well or it doesn't.

I stand by my assessment. You had issues getting the VLDs to shoot well with jump, found your confirmation on the internet to support your bias so problem solved; VLDs must be just off/just kissing to shoot well. You continuing to tell me something I already know to be false only reaffirms my original conclusion.
 
I already know to be false only reaffirms my original conclusion.

All it confirms is you are a complete ass that thinks he needs to be right. If you read my original post:

My experience is quite the contrary with VLD's, they hate to jump. My best accuracy with them has been seating the bullet so when chambered they are snug in the lands.

I have plenty of experience shooting them and my best accuracy with them has been with no to very little jump and I have all the targets and load info to prove it.

Where in that post did I say you were full of shit? Where did I say the sky was purple? Where did I give the OP advice that YOU HAVE TO DO THIS OR THEY WONT WORK???

Read this:

Berger admitted the VLD's were very jump sensitive and as far as I am aware that is the reason they developed the hybrids.

So all that BS you listed above needs to be done because the VLD's are NOT jump sensitive? You are an idiot.

Out of 7 match grade guns and 4 different calibers that I have fired VLD's in ALL have shot extremely well with the bullet touching or .005 off the lands. There is no maybe, no possibly, no finding out the chamber dimensions. If I want them to work well, I put them .005 off the lands or in the lands, problem solved. No fucking about loading all that crap listed above to find some "sweet spot"

THEY ARE a jump sensitive bullet. If they weren't, you would not need to do all that bullshit you listed in your reply.. What they listed was a solution to a problem. The problem happens to be jump sensitivity. All I did was express MY EXPERIENCE. What part of that don't you understand? Its my experience, not Fred's, not Jack's, not Tony's, MINE.
 
Last edited:
Berger recommends that, hence the quotation marks. I've never had that much difficulty taking measurement, setting desired jump and finalizing load. I don't find Berger VLDs to be any more difficult to find "sweet spot" then SMKs, though YMMV.

Interesting you need to resort to name calling when presented with data, difference of opinion over course of discussion on how to make something work.
 
Brass life with heavies has been just fine for me if I don't push to hard. RL17, PP2000MR, both work well for the 200+ bullets with RL 17 giving the best velocity and 2000MR giving the best accuracy. I run Winchester brass with the heavies to give me more case space and I run 'm long and single load. I'm starting to play with Ramshot Hunter with 208gr Amax bullets and although the velocity is not as much as the RL 17, the accuracy has been very good. In the 185gr range I'm using the Berger VLDs and PP2000MR powder in Winchester cases - one rifle likes 'em jammed and one seems to like them jumped a bit. Go figure....
 
Interesting you need to resort to name calling when presented with data, difference of opinion over course of discussion on how to make something work.

No, it is pretty much because your condescending BS and I don't take crap or have a lot of time for people that think they know it all and belittle others in the process of making a point unless they are blatantly ignorant and deserve it. Turnabout is fair play. You want to act like an ass, I am going to treat you like one. If you can't take it, don't start whining. If I can show a little respect where respect is due, then I expect the same.

Berger suggests jumping VLDs. You've drank too much of the Berger VLDs are jump sensitive Kool-aid, believe too much of internet "truth".

Seems to me you found your conformational bias and ran with it. I suspect your loading skills, combined with your conformational bias, are limiting factor to making VLDs shoot well.

You don't know me, you do not know anything about my loading skills, and you certainly don't know how well I shoot. For you to make any smart ass assumptions based of a couple lines in a post shows your arrogance. Your lack of reading comprehension shows your ignorance. The fact you said that BS gives me all the reason to return it in kind.

No where in this thread did I say only my way works. All I did was share my experience as others have. You piped in with the BS I quoted from you above and I took it upon myself to inform you exactly how I feel about your condescending attitude. If you want respect for your opinions you need to show that same respect to others or keep your fingers off the keyboard.
 
Wow, another thread derailed by ego on the hide, go figure. Rhunter u proclaimed vld as being jump sensitive u said all 7 of ur rifles needed soft jam or 5 thou jump. Proclaimed that u had load and target data. I got 8 rifles with load and target data to prove they don't mind jump, does this make me right? I used to think they needed to jammed 10 thou, but experimentation proved other wise. Berger, after much testing has found the same conclusion as me. Some rifles don't like some bullets, this is why the hybrids came out. Hybrids offer hi bc with a slightly different ogive design that makes them different then vld. Basically gives finicky rifles another hi bc option if they don't like vld's. In this case u r right, i'm right. Testing is the only way for op to determine for himself. I should note that once u become set in stone with preconceived notions, u lose all objectivity. Remarks like my way and only this way become verbage of that mentality.
 
I got 8 rifles with load and target data to prove they don't mind jump, does this make me right?

No, that is your experience.

Where did I say I was right? I shared my experience.

Remarks like my way and only this way become verbage of that mentality.

Show me where I said that please.

I think where some of you have an issue is understanding what sensitive to jump is. You are assuming that jump sensitivity is, if a VLD has to make a jump it wont be accurate and you think I am saying that because of my results. You are reading way too much into what was said.

Jump sensitivity to me and lots of other smart people with good reading comprehension skills is, you can not place the bullet at any reasonable seating depth you want and get the same results.

I can take 190 grain Sierra Match Kings and load them anywhere between .01 and .15 off the lands and get the same results. You can't do that with a VLD and that makes a VLD sensitive to jump. When the jump to the lands significantly affects the accuracy of the bullet, you have a bullet that is jump sensitive. You have to go through that process above to find the "sweet spot", the amount of jump the bullet wont mind and still deliver accuracy. I don't have to do that with tangent ogive bullets.

For me to get consistent results with VLD's I have put them in the lands or just barely off of them. The key words in that statement are "For me". I am not into fucking around with that process outlined by Berger of loading 48 rounds with depth all over the place when I know all I have to do is seat them .005 off the lands on in them. Chasing my lands is as easy as partially seating a bullet, clambering it, pulling it out and measuring it and using that measurement for the next couple hundred rounds. Simple, quick, easy, consistent results.
 
How much freebore in chamber?

VLDs do just fine with 0.040" (or more) of jump, I've gotten too many rifles to shoot really well jumping VLDs to believe otherwise.

No way to answer your question w/o knowing what the freebore dimension is.

Maybe it is the difference between really well and extremely well. What may be acceptable to you may not be acceptable to someone else. I have never, ever, no matter what gun I have used been able to shoot a VLD with a jump better than a SMK... I have never, ever, been able to shoot a SMK without a jump as good a I can shoot a VLD without one.

Berger admitted the VLD's were very jump sensitive and as far as I am aware that is the reason they developed the hybrids.

Those who live in glass houses ought not throw rocks.

No, it is pretty much because your condescending BS and I don't take crap or have a lot of time for people that think they know it all and belittle others in the process of making a point unless they are blatantly ignorant and deserve it. Turnabout is fair play. You want to act like an ass, I am going to treat you like one. If you can't take it, don't start whining. If I can show a little respect where respect is due, then I expect the same.



You don't know me, you do not know anything about my loading skills, and you certainly don't know how well I shoot. For you to make any smart ass assumptions based of a couple lines in a post shows your arrogance. Your lack of reading comprehension shows your ignorance. The fact you said that BS gives me all the reason to return it in kind.

No where in this thread did I say only my way works. All I did was share my experience as others have. You piped in with the BS I quoted from you above and I took it upon myself to inform you exactly how I feel about your condescending attitude. If you want respect for your opinions you need to show that same respect to others or keep your fingers off the keyboard.

I started with a request for information and a comment based off of my experience that VLDs take jump just fine.
You want to quote me, complete with chest thumping on how "...I have never, ever, no matter what gun I have used been able to shoot a VLD with a jump better than a SMK... I have never, ever, been able to shoot a SMK without a jump as good a I can shoot a VLD without one." and "...Maybe it is the difference between really well and extremely well. What may be acceptable to you may not be acceptable to someone else...". Waste of bandwidth to continue this discussion.

Best wishes on your shooting and being treated with respect RHunter.

OP - I apologize for taking your thread off on a tangent. Get some information on your chamber and you'll be able to make an informed decision on bullet choice.
 
davisdewald,
A couple of things come to mind. First off, make absolutely sure your smith knows you're planning to use long (heavy) bullets and chamber the rifle appropriately with a longer throat to optimally handle them. You should be able to figure out about how much freebore you may want based on COAL and what will still fit in you mags. If you don't specify, you might end up with something really short that won't allow you to effectively shoot the heavies.

Even so, your major limitation is going to be loading to mag length. Obviously this limits how far out you can seat the bullet and still get enough powder in the case to get decent velocity. A reloading program like Quickload might be of use to get some estimates with different bullets/powders. I am running 185 Berger Juggernauts out of a GAP bolt gun at around 2770 fps, 20 thous. jump. This rifle has a medium length freebore of .085"; however, this is short of the optimal length for the 185s by about half, and my loads are definitely too long for an AICS mag. I find it surprising that people are able to load these longer (heavier) bullets to mag length and still get decent performance, but I'll take their word that they have them working well. My guess is that what you're going to find is that if you get much longer than Berger 185/Sierra 190 Matchking length, you won't be able to safely get enough powder in the case to push them very fast. In addition, with the bullet seated so deep in the case, you may have issues with brass life if you try to push them very hard.

Also, you mention possibly using 190 or 210 VLDs. I don't want to get into the seating depth argument; it's pointless and can differ widely for different rifles. However, VLD type bullets are the longest of any for their weight. In your situation of needing to load to mag length, this may work against you. I would suggest looking at non-VLDs to see if you can find some in the weight range you might want to try that have the best BC and the shortest bearing surface. These would be the most likely to give you the best performance loaded at mag length.
 
Thanks for the info. Yeah, my smith knows I am wanting to shoot the long heavy VLDs. He said all the custom action 308s he does have what he called a 308 match chamber that can handle the long and heavies. I took some measurements of my AW mag and if I load them to a OAL of 2.970 or maybe even 2.975 I still think the mag will cycle properly. I am going to load them to the longest I can and still have them function in the mag. I just bought some of the berger 185 classic hunter hybrid bullets and I am going to try those out first. Anyways you have been a big help. Thanks again.
 
Has anyone tried the Lapua D46 185gr FMJ in a .308 or any .30 cal for that matter? Per Mr German Salazar, the D46 FMJs are very, very accurate bullets(especially considering since theyre FMJs!) that are cheaper than a lot of the fancier stuff. Not to mention the BC is certainly not bad at all(once again especially for a FMJ). If what Mr Salazar said is still true today regarding price then I think these would be great practice/range rounds, or otherwise any other type of high volume long range shooting. And considering the shape, they shouldnt be real hard to work up a load for.