Both numbers look ok, just not from the same rifle. .030” is a big spread when measuring to the lands. I would expect to see a .005” diff in measurements, maybe even .010”, but not .030”. To be clear, I’m not judging, just giving an opinion.
Finding the length to the lands can be tricky. I’ve never used the Hornady tool, but I can see how it could be really accurate.
I usually break my bolt down to nothing but the bolt body and extractor, take a once fired case and write “dummy” on it in sharpie, and never use it for anything else. I’ll seat a bullet long in the dummy case, then put the case on the bolt face under the extractor groove, and run the whole mess into the chamber slowly, and close the bolt. Open the bolt and slowly/carefully pull the dummy round out. Look at the ogive for any marks from the lands. If there’s no marks I assume that I didn’t jam it into the lands, only made contact with the lands. Take measurement, and repeat 4, 5, 10 times. Record the measurements, and go with the average, assuming all measurements are within .010” of each other.
In my creed with a 130 Berger hybrid I have a COAL of ~2.900” to the lands, with a CBTO of ~2.296”.
All that being said, I load to mag length. With the 130, I’ve been seating to 2.820” COAL, a good .080” short of the lands. I may play with it some to see if I can get a little more out of the rounds with seating depth changes, but haven’t so far.
I’m sure someone on here with experience with Hornady tool will chime in with some advice.