So with lapua making SR primer cases for CM now. Is there any advantage to running 47L vs cm?
Use is PRS events only
Use is PRS events only
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So with lapua making SR primer cases for CM now. Is there any advantage to running 47L vs cm?
Use is PRS events only
I think something worth mentioning is the x47L is known to shoot the heavier projos well with Varget. Varget is much more available than H4350 which the Creedmoor was practically designed to use. If you're buying Lapua brass anyways, the x47L is generally a few bucks cheaper per 100 and more available to boot.
I have been told that the 260 has a greater capacity than either the CM or the x47. Can anyone confirm or disprove this? Apologies for going a bit off topic.
If you handload and are certain that you will never need factory ammo, I'd go with the 47L. If you hunt, and especially if you travel and hunt, or ever think you might need to run out for some ammo in a pinch...for sure go with the Creedmoor. If I had to choose purely on accuracy I'd go with the 47L but the gain is imperceptible now that there's Lapua SRP brass for the Creedmoor.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I had the same conundrum 3 yrs ago, but with the mentioned 2 and the 260. I love to shoot Lapua brass so it was a 47L vs 260 question for me. I chose the 260 basically in a coin flip. Since Lapua started making CM brass, I am pretty sure if I had to make this choice now I would go with the CM. It is really taking off, rifles and ammo everywhere for it. I like my 260's and probly have enough Lapua brass put up to last me a lifetime so I will keep what I have.
Advantages are really in the eye of the shooter....
Ill tell you why I still prefer it as my 6.5 short action cartridge of choice; it's ridiculously efficient, simple to load for, and the brass last for ever. What little velocity and powder capacity the x47 gives up to the 6.5CM it makes up for in case design. It sounds insane but that little cartridge can withstand some serious pressure. Im not necessarily recommending you push it that hard just letting you know it can be pushed to make up some of its velocity loss.
All in all despite my affinity to the 6.5x47 it's really just preference. One isn't necessarily better than the other.
Things I have read 260 CAN be tough to make the most accurate COAL fit in sa at times. 260 lost in this debate early based on COAL
I don't think 6.5 Creed Lapua brass has been out long enough to make a determination between it and x47. It'd be cool to know though. Lapua/creed, 50 fps gain in velocity, yes or no? As accurate? Theoretically it should last equally but....
One thing for sure, it's been hard looking elsewhere with 10 years, almost 35 firings on my 6x47l brass, and most cases still going strong!
How often do anneal and what brass prep do make it last that much
I was just overhearing a smith talking about this same topic with a shooter. Was saying for some reason on average the 6.5x47 vs the 6.5creed always had a tendency to be more accurate. Something to do with the chamber size of the x47 possibly attributing to this.....anyone else ?
No hunting with this, no traveling. And yes high.quality reloading tools only. Zero factory ammo
I´m in love with my 6.5 Creedmoor. I use a 26" Bartlein and load nosler brass with 43gr of RL-17 and this is how it shoots. SD goes a little high on very hot days, but normally stays around 10
It does seem that every posted grouping is one ragged ass hole. Yes I know shooter and other factors play in but it does seem to stooopid accurate every time I see it posted
Have all 3. I prefer x47L. The most accurate round I have ever loaded for and load development is super easy, brass life is insane. It is insanely accurate with Varget with low single digit SD's.
Wonder if that's cause the x47 groups are always handloads? Hard to compare.
I would be curious to hear if there was anybody who staunchly supports the CM over the 6.5 x 47- and what their justification was beside being able to run factory loads.
Marketing trends and general group think are very interesting to me. In general, it seems the folks at the top level will choose the x47 cartridge over CM, but market demand is completely opposite this trend. I have read it on a few other forums in my research, but what do you all think the reason that 6.5 x 47 never went 'mainstream' while 6.5 Creedmoor did?
It is comprised of many thousands, if not hundreds of thousands, of people who want to be able to drop some cash on a factory rifle, scope and factory ammo and be able to hit what they aim at when shooting at 1000 yards or less.
Seeing guys using Varget and 140 gr bullets with success in the 6.5 x 47. Would this not work with the Creedmoor as well or is the difference in case capacity a factor? About to re barrel soon and contemplating the 47 over the CM. Varget seems a lot easier to find for sure.
I would be curious to hear if there was anybody who staunchly supports the CM over the 6.5 x 47- and what their justification was beside being able to run factory loads.
Marketing trends and general group think are very interesting to me. In general, it seems the folks at the top level will choose the x47 cartridge over CM, but market demand is completely opposite this trend. I have read it on a few other forums in my research, but what do you all think the reason that 6.5 x 47 never went 'mainstream' while 6.5 Creedmoor did?
My 6.5cm Varget testing showed pressure signs when trying to get velocity up to H4350 speeds with 140g bullets. Accurate but slower.
I've used H4831sc in 6.5cm and 260rem.. all 26" Bartlein. 4831sc need way more powder in the case than H4350 and Varget and was still slower than both.
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
Yea I got nowhere near that with 140's and 4831sc at 46g..