Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
To enter, all you need to do is add an image of yourself at the range below! Subscribers get more entries, check out the plans below for a better chance of winning!
Join the contest SubscribeWho cares what everyone else is using? If you're not seeing pressure signs, who's to say you couldn't go another 0.5gr or more higher to get 3000fps?
I've had slow lots of powder that didn't match up with data online...
The 0.3gr is just a suggestion to save time, components, and hopefully confusion with the OCW. Instead of 10 5-shot strings to cover only 1.8 total grains, why not 8 5-shot strings that cover 38.4-40.5? If you graph the velocity you should see a flat spot that correlates to your accuracy node. If you run into pressure then stop and pull the bullets. If you were shooting a 338 Lapua with 90gr of powder, would you still use 0.2gr increments?
36.8-37.0 of varget is money in the 6xc for my AXMC
Everything I've read/heard said the 110 SMKs are a no-go in an 8 twist. When ordering from Bartlein, Frank said a 7.5 twist should work but I went with a 7.25 twist to play it safe (I'm planning on shooting the 110 SMKs exclusively).
Everything I've read/heard said the 110 SMKs are a no-go in an 8 twist. When ordering from Bartlein, Frank said a 7.5 twist should work but I went with a 7.25 twist to play it safe (I'm planning on shooting the 110 SMKs exclusively).
Yes and it is better than Norma in my opinion as I have not gotten any donuts at 8 times fired. You are correct as Alpha recommends a 6XC II chamber which has a .4714 web area and .275 neck. The 6XC II has more room basically.Has anyone tried the new Alpha SRP brass for the 6XC? I see they state it’s better in a 6XC II chamber, not sure what that is honestly. I’ve been doing a lot of research for a more recoil friendly PRS round, and 6XC is in the lead by quite a bit.
I know this isn’t the most appropriate question for the reloading depot, but can anyone speak the felt recoil vs a 6.5 CM?
7.5 should do just fine. 3k is doable as well.Talked to Mr. Gradous this morning, and he said the new Robert Whitley 6XC short throat and long throat reamers will be in his shop soon. I'm having a 26" spun up for my AI AT, and I wanted to get some input from you all on the 115 DTAC's. Do I want a 1:7.5 to shoot the 115's? I have 300 pieces of the Alpha 6XC II SRP brass (which is why I'm waiting for the Whitley die), and plan on running H4350. Is 3,000 FPS a reasonable expectation?
Talked to Mr. Gradous this morning, and he said the new Robert Whitley 6XC short throat and long throat reamers will be in his shop soon. I'm having a 26" spun up for my AI AT, and I wanted to get some input from you all on the 115 DTAC's. Do I want a 1:7.5 to shoot the 115's? I have 300 pieces of the Alpha 6XC II SRP brass (which is why I'm waiting for the Whitley die), and plan on running H4350. Is 3,000 FPS a reasonable expectation?
Profit.I'm confused. The inventor of this round suggest 1-8 twist, his DTAC coated bullets, 26-30" barrels, Peterson LRP brass, the Masson reamer, and H4350 or H1000. Followed by the TMS system every 300-400 rounds and a brass or bronze brush with Sweets 762. No neck turning required, loaded on a Dillon 550 and load development conducted at .5 increments. This is as of Friday when I called to collect information on a possible build. So why are so many not following the suggestion of the inventor? Not belittling the efforts of anyone here. I don't have one and looking at doing one. So my question is solely for information purposes. Was this information not available before? Did it prove out to be incorrect? I understand that some of the suggestions are pushing the products he gets the greatest profit from. But, I would venture a guess that he also wants the best performance out of it as well. Any calcification will be appreciated.
Know a guy who tried it. Velocity was there just couldn't get it to group like H4350 for whatever reasonAnyone using RL 16? I've just completed my build for my 6XC and have loaded up some rounds with H4350 but was curious about the RL 16.
This is extremely thorough and VERY helpful; Thank you paproctor8! I've just started loading for 6XC as I'm new to caliber and greatly appreciate the comprehensive response.I have been using RL 16 in my 6XC all season and am very happy with the results, which are the same for three consecutive barrels now. Accuracy no worse than H4350 and H4831sc (which were both excellent), and I have not experienced any practical issues with the often-mentioned fact that the powder burns "dirtier" than others. Just clean your brake after each match and follow same barrel cleaning as with other powders.
Speed is better though. I found a node with 105 hybrids at 3160 fps (39.8 gr RL 16) that I cannot reach without mild pressure signs using H4350. I tested RL 16 up to 3230 fps just to explore where pressure would show up and had just barely flattened primers but no sticky bolt. This is with the 105s loaded so that the BT/bearing surface junction is about 1/3 of the way from the neck/shoulder junction, so keep in mind that my safe loads may be significantly higher than yours and follow appropriate safe load workup on your own rifle.
With uncoated DTACs I can push velocity to 3070-3080 before seeing pressure signs, but it shoots best at 2980 fps which is a node that I can also reach easily with H4350 or H4831sc.
My setup is:
6XC II chamber
28" Bartlein 7.4 twist
Peterson small primer brass
CCI 450s
115 DTACs (uncoated) or 105 hybrids
98Vandal I hope you find this useful.