• Frank's Lesson's Contest

    We want to see your skills! Post a video between now and November 1st showing what you've learned from Frank's lessons and 3 people will be selected to win a free shirt. Good luck everyone!

    Create a channel Learn more
  • Having trouble using the site?

    Contact support

A moral Democrat. I’m speechless.

Not the first Democrat nor the first black Democrat have something similar to say.

I'm reminded of affirmative action. I have yet to see a self-respecting educated black, Latino want to be given a job just because at the color of their skin ...... they want to earn the job on there qualifications and skill.

That same mentality hold true in regards to the election. All the educated Democrats that I ever met are okay with losing a fair election and the same can't be said for the Republicans. Anything that gives the appearance of fraud goes to lessen the value of the voter.
 
We need a Constitution Party... All Republicans and Democrats who respect this country's ideals and fiercely support what it stands for should be part of it. There are lots of powerful voices out there, but they are literally drowning in the status quo of their larger parties which does not give a shit about preservation of our domestic security by upholding the principles on which this nation has been founded in the first place.
 
We need a Constitution Party... All Republicans and Democrats who respect this country's ideals and fiercely support what it stands for should be part of it. There are lots of powerful voices out there, but they are literally drowning in the status quo of their larger parties which does not give a shit about preservation of our domestic security by upholding the principles on which this nation has been founded in the first place.
I think there actually is a Constitution Party; but they've been drowned out to almost oblivion. Back when "W" was running for round 2, I was looking into some party that more closely aligned to my beliefs and to the Founders beliefs. "W" was really the start of the great divide of the nation. His stupid war really, really hurt this country. Had he stuck to the goal of getting Bin Laden, he'd have done already; but he gave us The Unpatriot Act which is unforgivable as far as I'm concerned (and congratulating biden).
 
I think " moral democrat" is an oxymoron...just sayin
If it turns out that Trump does lose, he would be the perfect one to start another party. Strike while the iron is hot, keep holding massive rallies and stirring up Patriots. It's not like he's ever had strong support from the Republican establishment, and he's much more of a fighter than most repubs. He has support from the people right now, but if he bows out, he'll be forgotten by next election.
 
I tend to agree; Trump is king maker right now. If he loses this election in the courts, he does have the moxy to create a "Constitution Party" or "Tea Party", and I believe has enough clout (as a populist) to actually be a genuine threat to the two party system.

He very well could become the "Lincoln" of his era (since Lincoln brought the "Republican" party into being).
 
I tend to agree; Trump is king maker right now. If he loses this election in the courts, he does have the moxy to create a "Constitution Party" or "Tea Party", and I believe has enough clout (as a populist) to actually be a genuine threat to the two party system.

He very well could become the "Lincoln" of his era (since Lincoln brought the "Republican" party into being).
Personally I think you’re going to need a new kingmaker if he doesn’t prevail in his court case. Without the Justice department and executive privilege the IRS and the Southern District of New York are going to keep him very busy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kir
I tend to agree; Trump is king maker right now. If he loses this election in the courts, he does have the moxy to create a "Constitution Party" or "Tea Party", and I believe has enough clout (as a populist) to actually be a genuine threat to the two party system.

He very well could become the "Lincoln" of his era (since Lincoln brought the "Republican" party into being).
This is why if he loses they'll bury him in legal games for years to come.
Two for one.
"Discredit" him and serves as a warning to all other billionaires who would.

R
 
We need to split the dems. If there are any centrists in the libtard left, they need a viable alternative. As mentioned before, however, a three party system has it’s downfalls as well. I’m all for being rid of all parties, PACs, lobbying through monetary donations, and reinvigorating the will of the people. Get rid of the bullshit.
 
A new party with any serious following would ruin an existing party forever
example Libertarians current take votes away from Republicans, it just not millions of votes

Bernie should spin off and make his own socialist party, I think he could pull enough votes away from Dems that they would never win another election. This way you might also get the radical part of the dem party to part ways with the dem party, which is what really needs to happen.

Maybe AOC could blow bloomberg to get enough money to make her own party of crazies
 
I believe all parties should be eliminated. Candidates hide under the umbrella of the party platform, because many people vote for a party, NOT for a candidate. Candidates would be FORCED to differentiate themselves and define what they truly stand for. Regardless, there will ALWAYS be liars, thieves and cheats. As Verbal Kint (The Usual Suspects) said, "The greatest trick the Devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn't exist. And like that - poof, he's gone!".
 
Dems believe in rights, the right to have free shit just because you were born. Real rights are already listed in the constitution and BOR’s. With everything being free, the sheeple won’t want to do anything to better themselves because they get what they need free without any effort. Then the elites can walk around and herd the sheep just like they want. Cocksuckers....
 
  • Like
Reactions: NCHillbilly
A new party with any serious following would ruin an existing party forever
example Libertarians current take votes away from Republicans, it just not millions of votes

Bernie should spin off and make his own socialist party, I think he could pull enough votes away from Dems that they would never win another election. This way you might also get the radical part of the dem party to part ways with the dem party, which is what really needs to happen.

Maybe Kamala Harris could blow bloomberg to get enough money to make her own party of crazies
Fixed it
 
Actually there’s a lot of good Democrats
Unfortunately the leaders and major figures are train wrecks.
Don't remember hearing from any of the "good democrats" during the Russian dossier hoax or the impeachment fiasco. If there truly are good democrats, they must feel very lonely right now. The democrat party of my grandfather no longer exists. Honestly not trying to pick a fight, but the few moderate democrats I know of sound more like republicans when you pin them down on policy.
 
Don't remember hearing from any of the "good democrats" during the Russian dossier hoax or the impeachment fiasco. If there truly are good democrats, they must feel very lonely right now. The democrat party of my grandfather no longer exists. Honestly not trying to pick a fight, but the few moderate democrats I know of sound more like republicans when you pin them down on policy.
I agree.
I really hope there’s a revolt in the Democrats and they get back on track.
 
I tend to agree; Trump is king maker right now. If he loses this election in the courts, he does have the moxy to create a "Constitution Party" or "Tea Party", and I believe has enough clout (as a populist) to actually be a genuine threat to the two party system.

He very well could become the "Lincoln" of his era (since Lincoln brought the "Republican" party into being).


Many/most Dems ARE dumb... but they CAN learn...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Steel head
I think there actually is a Constitution Party; but they've been drowned out to almost oblivion. Back when "W" was running for round 2, I was looking into some party that more closely aligned to my beliefs and to the Founders beliefs. "W" was really the start of the great divide of the nation. His stupid war really, really hurt this country. Had he stuck to the goal of getting Bin Laden, he'd have done already; but he gave us The Unpatriot Act which is unforgivable as far as I'm concerned (and congratulating biden).

The Patriot Act is probably the biggest perversion of individual rights and freedoms and the constitution in recent history, probably ever in the history of the US. Every single president since Bush has renewed that act, including Trump. Worse yet, it's recently been deemed illegal, yet there's been almost no publicity about it, or any public outrage. James Clapper, the Director of the NSA, openly lied under oath to the Senate when asked if his agency was spying on citizens of the USA. Not only did he not get charged in any manner, he continued to serve out the rest of his term under the Obama administration, and now works for CNN disseminating the news.

There's been open and blatant corruption, and yet there's been no accountability for those responsible. There's been zero media focus or outrage by the public, on what should be the biggest news and scandal of recent history. This is a huge problem, and I don't know how the Republic can be put back on track if we continue to let such perversions of our country go unpunished.
 
I really hope there’s a revolt in the Democrats and they get back on track.

"back on track" -this is one of the most successful lies of the Democratic party. Many who remember the Democratic party from the mid-20th century espouse the belief that at one time, the party was basically decent.

However, a look back through history starting at their beginning reveals that they have ALWAYS been a party that seeks to enrich an elite few by enslaving those too weak to fend for themselves, and that they have a penchant for cruelty to those under their dominion.
Dinesh D'Souza did an excellent historical expose on them in his documentary "Hillary's America -the Secret History of the Democratic Party."

The Democratic party was formed in 1828 by Andrew Jackson -a slave owner famous for his exceptional cruelty compared to other slave owners. The first major official act of the new Democratic party under Jackson's direction was the passage of the Indian Removal Act. Everyone knows Jackson used the Federal government to force Native Americans off their land, but what is less commonly known is that Jackson then personally sold that land for pennies on the dollar to settlers moving west during the gold rush in exchange for votes for the Democratic party. Two decades later, they opposed liberating the slaves. What did they do when Lincoln won? Not my president 1.0. They pushed for secession and then bankrolled the Confederacy. When they lost the civil war, the leaders of the party continued their drive to enslave the weak by forming the KKK and murdered thousands of blacks. What is not as well known is that they also murdered thousands of white Republican Party supporters. In the late 1800s, we had black congressmen. The Democratic Party ended that, too. Jim Crow? Democratic party. They didn't pass the Civil Rights Act; they opposed it. After the longest fillibuster inAmerican history, they allowed the passage of the Civil Rights Act and immediately changed tactics to portray themselves as the friend of the minority and the poor. They took credit for the passage of an act they opposed. This era where they put on new camouflage is what people are remembering when they say the Democratic party needs to get "back on track". In reality, that party is evil. And they have been since day 1.
 
Something about a broken clock...

R

An idiom about an unreliable person occasionally being correct through dumb luck. . .

The implication is that you believe Mr. D'Souza's historical expose which I shared is correct. So who, in your appraisal is the unreliable person? Me or Mr. D'Souza? And more importantly, why?
 
An idiom about an unreliable person occasionally being correct through dumb luck. . .

The implication is that you believe Mr. D'Souza's historical expose which I shared is correct. So who, in your appraisal is the unreliable person? Me or Mr. D'Souza? And more importantly, why?
Aimed towards the OP.

BTW I think Dinesh is right quite often.


R
 
  • Like
Reactions: Odysseus1911
I think that the four previous years, combined with the current manipulation and twisting of the election process by the Dems have demonstrated that the Rule of Law is dead.

I believe there is no further evidence required to declare once and for all the Democratic Process a failed experiment.

The corrupt thumb their noses openly at demands that they be indicted. They are convinced that the Nation lacks the moral backbone to do so, and so far they are absolutely correct.

When justice for some is no longer justice for all; there is no justice for any.

The Democratic Process is broken beyond redemption and deliberately so by those who wish to convert it to a socialist tyranny. It cannot continue, and it cannot be fixed. Turning back clocks in not a strategy.

America is dead because the Constitution is openly and consistently ridiculed.

I fear and pray for our Republic and fully expect men and women of good faith to rise up and throw off the coming yoke of tyranny.

But I'm equally certain that they won't.

Greg
 
Last edited: