A tough choice between two rifles

Saiga76

Sergeant
Full Member
Minuteman
May 16, 2011
164
0
48
Las Vegas, NV
This is getting quite frustrating! Here I thought I knew what rifle I wanted for sure, but now, I'm not so sure? I had decided on the Savage 10 FP .308. I got a lot of positive feedback about this rifle from several members of this forum. I also had some PM's that recommended the Remington 700 SPS Tactical or the 700 varmint .308. The tactical I noticed only has a 20" barrel, which I would think would hinder some of its accuracy? I'm really confused on which rifle to purchase now. I have the cash to buy now but I would hate to make the wrong choice and be stuck with a rifle that I'm not happy with. I have never shot a Savage of any sort nor have I shot a 700 series Rem. I currently own a cheap Remington 770 30.06. I might be over thinking this decision but I would love to hear the pro's and con's of both rifles. Thanks, and sorry for all of the rookie questions
confused.gif
 
Re: A tough choice between two rifles

I misspoke, I meant it would affect the velocity of the bullet I would think? Where abouts in OR are you from? I'm from the McMinnville area originally! Thanks for your reply.
 
Re: A tough choice between two rifles

The 20 inch barrel will affect accuracy under certain circumstances . What it does is reduce your long range accuracy at a certain range where velocity drops to the sound barrier , the transonic zone. The longer the barrel , the more velocity you can get using slower burning powders so it helps extend the effective range of the gun. If you don't intend shooting much over 400 to 500 y then the 20 inch will shoot just as well around that range give or take depending on what loads you use.
The Savage rifles have some refinments to improve accuracy and ease of fitting new barrels but beyond that are not that well made . In my opinion the Model 700 Varmint Stainless Fluted (SF ) is what I would buy out of those choices.
 
Re: A tough choice between two rifles

I agree, the SF looks like a much better bet than the tactical. The 26" barrel sounds more like it. I did not like the sound of a 20" barrel for a long range shooter for me!
 
Re: A tough choice between two rifles

The 20 inch barrel is ok for pure tactical work and short range work as it is stiff for it's diameter and compact to carry and use. Police snipers don't usually need to shoot at much more than 200 to 300 anyway as it is too dangerous in an urban situation to shoot at long range and the risk of wind causing a miss and hitting the hostage is too great . Wind in a city with tall buildings is almost impossible to predict anyway with the tunneling and blocking effects of high rise .
Also a short barrel is more stealthy as it does not stick out so far and attract attention .
However hunting and target shooting is a different ball game . Longer range is a different ball game.
 
Re: A tough choice between two rifles

You can't go wrong with the 10FP Savage with a 24" barrel I assume or the SPS-T 20" barrel. I've owned both and can say it's a toss up, just what do you like or prefer brand wise. Both will likely shoot better than you but be aware the stocks on both suck.

Todd
 
Re: A tough choice between two rifles

An after market stock would be one of the first things I added to either rifle. I have read a lot of good things about the Remington 700 action and have not heard too much about the Savage action though. Others say the Savage barrel is better and easier to remove than the Remington. If I end up going the Remington route, I would probably go with the SF model over the Tactical. The hammer forged fluted barrel is a nice selling point!
 
Re: A tough choice between two rifles

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Country</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The 20 inch barrel is ok for pure tactical work and short range work as it is stiff for it's diameter and compact to carry and use. Police snipers don't usually need to shoot at much more than 200 to 300 anyway as it is too dangerous in an urban situation to shoot at long range and the risk of wind causing a miss and hitting the hostage is too great . Wind in a city with tall buildings is almost impossible to predict anyway with the tunneling and blocking effects of high rise .
Also a short barrel is more stealthy as it does not stick out so far and attract attention .
However hunting and target shooting is a different ball game . Longer range is a different ball game.
</div></div>

Have you been watching "Shooter" lately? Savage not made as well as a Remington? Dude, please.

OP,

A 20" barrel is fine for the ranges that a 308 is effective. In fact, the owner of this site, Frank, uses an 18" barrel out to 1000 yards. Savage is renowned for out of the box accuracy. Remingtons are also well made. Each company has had its share of QC problems. I have personally owned a Savage 10fp and a Remington 700P. I had no issues with either platform. They both have plenty of aftermarket accessories, so you are not selling yourself short with either in terms of upgrades. Choose one and get to the range. Enjoy shooting.

Josh
 
Re: A tough choice between two rifles

I have found a lot of accessories for both rifles, which is a good selling point. So far, it sounds like I can't really go wrong with either rifle at this point. I guess its just a matter of preference now?
 
Re: A tough choice between two rifles

Both Savage and Remington make outstanding rifles. I used to use the Savage 10PC, but sold it and now shoot a Remington. While my personal preference is the Remington, as I've also done a lot of custom work to it, the Savage will do just what you are asking it to. In the end, which rifle do YOU like the best? Which rifle feels like a better fit for YOU? Things like this may be more of the questions you need to ask now, IMO.
 
Re: A tough choice between two rifles

Yea, another pain in the ass about this process is the fact that its hard to find both of these rifles stocked at the local gun shops. I would like to at least hold them to see which felt more comfortable to me. I'm going to go down to the Bass Pro Shop and see what they have in stock. They usually only carry the baseline models. I doubt they have a Remington 700 SF or a Savage 10fp in stock? From what I have read, I'm leaning towards the Remington a little!
 
Re: A tough choice between two rifles

I have a 308 700 sps tactical w/ the 20" barrel. Furthest I have shot is 600yards but it has been very accurate. If I could hold still I have no doubt my groups would be pretty tight. Plan to take it out too 800 as my skill improves. You loose a little velocity with the shorter barrel as has been mentioned before but I did a lot of research on this gun before I bought it and I have never heard any complaints. I'm not dialing in any more drop at 600y than any of the ballistic calculators call for.. probably less. Being at 6600ft elevation does help though. I have several friends with Savages and they have been good rifles. On some of them the bolts feel a little more "sloppy" but it's never been an issue. I would buy a Savage no prob and have been considering getting a 110 FP tact in a 7mm rem mag or 300 win mag. I'm no expert but just some opinions and what I've researched....
 
Re: A tough choice between two rifles

I have a 20inch barrel and shoot out to 800 accuratly only issue is the shooter
smile.gif


I have also made it out to 1000yds just fine.

Also consider if you are going to put a suppressor on it. My barrel was orginal 24 inches and with an 8 inch suppressor I have 32 inches of barrel -- that is way to long for me .. so I cut it down to 20 which is much more reasonable for me. As for keeing the bullet above the speed of sound all depends on your loads and altitude. Everywhere I have shot I have calculated my Muzzle V and it stays above the Speed of Sound.

Just my 2 cents

Remmington all the way
 
Re: A tough choice between two rifles

Savage has somewhat fewer aftermarket options than the R700, but if you're even remotely a tinkerer, it quite satisfying (and comparatively inexpensive) to change or swap barrels in your garage or basement in 10-15 minutes.
 
Re: A tough choice between two rifles

Six of one, half a dozen of the other. I know lots of guys with Savages and they like them. The only thing that I didn't like about the Savage is the floating bolt head. Many tout this as an accuracy enhancer, but I see it as a weak point, so I went with a Remington 700.

I started out with an SPS Tactical. It shot very well. The Hogue stock that it came in wasn't all that bad. It didn't hinder the performance of the rifle, anyway. I really liked the short barrel. It kept things really manageable. The only real problem that I had was that the shorter barrel in conjunction with the big chamber and long throat yielded lower velocites than I would have liked. That problem went away when I had a Kriger barrel put on it though.

Either way, just get out and start shooting.
 
Re: A tough choice between two rifles

if you want more barrel the sps varmint has 75 rebate till the end of may, any FFL should order it for 600 or less out the door, if you can tolerate the stock it is possible to put together a 1 moa setup for under 1000 with basic base, rings and scope, if you do not like the sps or want to upgrade, you will not be "stuck" - for 10 % off it will sell in a day
 
Re: A tough choice between two rifles

I personally like the idea of a 20" barrel. I currently have a 26" and plan on chopping off a few inches, or just selling it and buying a shorter one. Planning on throwing a can on there this year and I don't need another 5-7" hanging off a 26" barrel. The sps tac, with a new stock would be a great first precision rifle... Not better than my 10/22, but close.
wink.gif
 
Re: A tough choice between two rifles

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: MinorDamage</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Country</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The 20 inch barrel is ok for pure tactical work and short range work as it is stiff for it's diameter and compact to carry and use. Police snipers don't usually need to shoot at much more than 200 to 300 anyway as it is too dangerous in an urban situation to shoot at long range and the risk of wind causing a miss and hitting the hostage is too great . Wind in a city with tall buildings is almost impossible to predict anyway with the tunneling and blocking effects of high rise .
Also a short barrel is more stealthy as it does not stick out so far and attract attention .
However hunting and target shooting is a different ball game . Longer range is a different ball game.
</div></div>

Have you been watching "Shooter" lately? Savage not made as well as a Remington? Dude, please.







OP,

A 20" barrel is fine for the ranges that a 308 is effective. In fact, the owner of this site, Frank, uses an 18" barrel out to 1000 yards. Savage is renowned for out of the box accuracy. Remingtons are also well made. Each company has had its share of QC problems. I have personally owned a Savage 10fp and a Remington 700P. I had no issues with either platform. They both have plenty of aftermarket accessories, so you are not selling yourself short with either in terms of upgrades. Choose one and get to the range. Enjoy shooting.

Josh </div></div>
You can believe what ever you want dude but I know what good machining and good design is when I see it. I have seen the extractor on a Savage fly off into the grass . I have seen the bolt head jam up.
Savage shoot quite well because they do a lot of extra work on them to help accuracy but the basic design and quality of workmanship is low compared to some other guns. I am not nocking a Savage if that's what a person wants but it would not be my choice over a Remington . This thread was about comparing the two guns so post your opinion of the Savage but don't try to gag my opinion.
As far as short barrels go it's a personal choice . For tactical work or targets they can be ok . A 308 does not loose that much by being cut down and with the right bullet and load can shoot at long range in good conditions . However I would not cut down a hunting barrel to 18 inches the muzzel blast and flash is horrific especially at night or a 300 magnum less than 22 inch especially for hunting . I hada fried that swore by the short barrel theory and cut his barrel on A CZ way down . Theoreticly speaking the barrel was long enough to give full ballistics in the 22 rimfire round but too his constant irritation it still did not shoot as well as my standard length barrel in the exact same gun.
Getting a short barrel made from a quality blank is one thing and it can shoot well but cutting down a factory barrel that is shooting well could be a gamble . As you have no idea of how tight the bore specs are further down the barrel . You could end up with a better shooter or a worse shooter or just the same . If you don't believe me just ask your gunsmith if he will cut down the barrel and guarantee excatly the same accuracy as before or better. He's a brave man if he does.


 
Re: A tough choice between two rifles

Country,

I am not trying to gag you, but I am not sure of anyone that believes Remington nor Savage have sterling QC records. Bottom line, the floating bolt head design is extremely smart and innovative for a factory rifle. Savages shoot well. To say that the level of workmanship is any lower than Remington is simply garbage. Do they crap the bed at times?...sure. Do they do it on average any more than Remingtons? Probably not.

I have had both. They both worked equally well and shot damn near the same. Let the OP go get his hands on both, decide which he likes better and go for it. In truth, I traded the Savage and bought the Remington thinking it would be a "better" rifle. It was no worse, but definitely no better.

Everyone has their horror stories about each platform. I wonder why one of the newest custom actions on the market, one that "renewed Lowlight's faith in custom actions" has a floating bolt head? Could it be that it is a legitimate way to design a rifle?

Josh
 
Re: A tough choice between two rifles

I've decided to go with the Remington 700 SPS Tactical. The amount of after market products and the overwhelming positive feedback I have heard about this rifle, I have decided to go this route. I appreciate everyones comments and suggestions and I can see that this was close to a Ford vs Chevy debate
smile.gif
I also just ordered 500 rounds of .308 ammo. From what I have read, ammo prices are making a good sized jump as of 6/1/11. Scary stuff people
frown.gif
 
Re: A tough choice between two rifles

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: cpt. obvious</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The 700 has way more aftermarket options than the savage.</div></div>

+1
 
Re: A tough choice between two rifles

Here's a really good article on shorter barrels. http://www.tacticaloperations.com/SWATbarrel/

You won't loose too much velocity with 20"s (GENERAL STATEMENT) but it's going to have a HECK of a flash
crazy.gif
and it'll really go boom. If flash or report aren't a problem for you then GO FOR IT. I bought mine for hunting so I DON'T CARE about either of those.
 
Re: A tough choice between two rifles

remington will have a better turn around if one day you decide to sell... i own both and will take the remy hands down. but like every one said savage is a fine weapon, but i belive them to be a couple steps under the remy
 
Re: A tough choice between two rifles

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: MinorDamage</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Country,

I am not trying to gag you, but I am not sure of anyone that believes Remington nor Savage have sterling QC records. Bottom line, the floating bolt head design is extremely smart and innovative for a factory rifle. Savages shoot well. To say that the level of workmanship is any lower than Remington is simply garbage. Do they crap the bed at times?...sure. Do they do it on average any more than Remingtons? Probably not.

I have had both. They both worked equally well and shot damn near the same. Let the OP go get his hands on both, decide which he likes better and go for it. In truth, I traded the Savage and bought the Remington thinking it would be a "better" rifle. It was no worse, but definitely no better.

Everyone has their horror stories about each platform. I wonder why one of the newest custom actions on the market, one that "renewed Lowlight's faith in custom actions" has a floating bolt head? Could it be that it is a legitimate way to design a rifle?


Josh </div></div>
Then you basicly agree with me so why the initial dissagreement dude! I don't care what you have owned . A Remingtons design is more reliable than a Savage . Savage do shoot well that is not the issue . Neither , would be my choice but that is not the issue either .
The floating bolt head is not innovative similar ideas have been around for many moons one in the Lee Enfield . If it was done precision it would be ok . However that's my contention the Savage is roughfly made . The floating bolt head allows for that.
 
Re: A tough choice between two rifles

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Country</div><div class="ubbcode-body">A Remingtons design is more reliable than a Savage.</div></div>

If you prefer Remingtons that's all fine and good and dandy, but please tell me there's more to this statement other than "it has a floating boat head".
 
Re: A tough choice between two rifles

No I don't personaly pefer Remington period . There is more if you bother to read the whole thread. I said out of the two choices I think Remington is the better choice for the reasons I said and then someone tries to shut me up a Savage salesman maybe .
I have heard plenty of negative stuff on this forum about the rifles I own but I am not jumping on anyone trying to shut them up .
 
Re: A tough choice between two rifles

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: idahowitzer</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Here's a really good article on shorter barrels. http://www.tacticaloperations.com/SWATbarrel/

You won't loose too much velocity with 20"s (GENERAL STATEMENT) but it's going to have a HECK of a flash
crazy.gif
and it'll really go boom. If flash or report aren't a problem for you then GO FOR IT. I bought mine for hunting so I DON'T CARE about either of those.
</div></div>

Well, the flash and a big bang don't bother me much at all. I figure, if we get invaded by a bunch of jihads, I'll add a suppressor to keep myself hidden
laugh.gif
I'm headed up your way in a few days, Meridian to be exact. My Mom and youngest sister live there. Can you suggest any good shooting sites up there?
 
Re: A tough choice between two rifles

Country,

Get me failure rates from Savage and Remy and then you can definitively say which is "more reliable". Calling me a savage salesman is funny considering my actual job is military and I do not own one Savage or Remington. I sold them all off in favor of the Sako TRG. I didn't bring that rifle up as it wasn't part of the debate. Think what you want, but your concrete blanket statements about manufacturers are false. I made my initial statements to the effect of both rifles being fine firearms.

Like Boltripper, sometimes I quote myself:
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: MinorDamage</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Savage is renowned for out of the box accuracy. Remingtons are also well made. Each company has had its share of QC problems. I have personally owned a Savage 10fp and a Remington 700P. I had no issues with either platform. They both have plenty of aftermarket accessories, so you are not selling yourself short with either in terms of upgrades. Choose one and get to the range. Enjoy shooting.</div></div>

OP,

Congrats on the Remington, it will serve you well.

Josh
 
Re: A tough choice between two rifles

Thanks, I'm pretty jazzed about getting started in the world of long-range shooting. Now all I have to do is find a good quality piece of glass and a bi-pod! I'm looking at the NightForce line up right now and I have to say I'm really impressed!
 
Re: A tough choice between two rifles

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: cpt. obvious</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The 700 has way more aftermarket options than the savage.</div></div>
This is why I went with the 700.
 
Re: A tough choice between two rifles

"Way more" options? Like what?

I know the R700 has a much broader selection of available stocks (I'd love to have the A3/A5 Medalist & AICS as Savage options), but what else is it lacking? Seems like triggers, scope bases, aftermarket barrels, etc. are pretty well accounted for.