Accuracy International AE Pic Rail Replacement

Lowlight

HMFIC of this Shit
Staff member
Moderator
Supporter
Minuteman
  • Apr 12, 2001
    35,949
    42,198
    Base of the Rockies
    www.snipershide.com
    Murphy Precision has sent over two rails to replace the factory AE rifle.

    As many know the factory AE has an uneven spacing that makes it hard to put mounts like the Spuhr on, so Murphy Precision has built two for me, one in Stainless with 0 MOA and one in Ti with 20MOA

    This will replace the rails on your AE ...

    400060_10151407261837953_1469399000_n.jpg


    Look and feel great, I can't wait to mount them on my Mk 1 and Mk III
     
    Re: Accuracy International AE Pic Rail Replacement

    They look great. So these are "prototypes" for you to test out and if you give the thumbs up they will move them into production?
     
    Re: Accuracy International AE Pic Rail Replacement

    Tom, i suspect you are going to read this thread....why do AEs have these "different" rails...what's the reason ?
     
    Re: Accuracy International AE Pic Rail Replacement

    Lowlight, how tall are these compared to the factory AE rail?

    I have no complaints with the Ken Farrel base other than it sits almost twice as high as the factory rail.
     
    Re: Accuracy International AE Pic Rail Replacement

    Definitely a little bit taller.

    Cameron addressed this to me when he was building them as it was necessary to raise them in order to get the proper pic spec on there.

    <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The other issue is height. The AE rail is really low profile. Normally I make my bases tall enough that I can put a continuous set of Picatinny slots across the top. Unfortunately this means the rail has to be at least .118" taller than the tops of the screw heads, or about .350" tall at a minimum. I could use an abbreviated set of slots like the AE rail, but I would still be about .040" taller due to the .240" tall screws I use. </div></div>

    But really if you have a MkII or MkIII it shouldn't matter any, you have an adjustable cheek piece. Only on a MkI, it might be an issue.
     
    Re: Accuracy International AE Pic Rail Replacement

    <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: WS®</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Lowlight, how tall are these compared to the factory AE rail?

    I have no complaints with the Ken Farrel base other than it sits almost twice as high as the factory rail. </div></div>

    I was going to ask the same question.

    Frank, a side picture of the rail or better yet a picture of it mounted to the receiver would be great.

    Looks like I'll be calling Cameron for a new rail for my MkIII and MHSA for a Spuhr.
    grin.gif
     
    Re: Accuracy International AE Pic Rail Replacement

    I will get pictures up, but I haven't changed it yet...

    I need to take a trip to Mile High to swap a barrel and do some other work so I will get the images shot as I change everything over.

    Having holidays in the middle just slows everything down.
     
    Re: Accuracy International AE Pic Rail Replacement

    I think these were designed before the SPUHR mount came into existance. AE rails are not really Mil Spec.
    I found my 20 MOA rail at US Optic. Mated my AE and S&B 5-25x56 fine.
     
    Re: Accuracy International AE Pic Rail Replacement

    <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: TJ.</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Tom, i suspect you are going to read this thread....why do AEs have these "different" rails...what's the reason ? </div></div>If you look at the rail, my conclusion is that it allows the rail to keep as low a profile as possible. the wide lugs are the ones with the receiver screws in them.
     
    Re: Accuracy International AE Pic Rail Replacement

    <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: bm11</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: TJ.</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Tom, i suspect you are going to read this thread....why do AEs have these "different" rails...what's the reason ? </div></div>If you look at the rail, my conclusion is that it allows the rail to keep as low a profile as possible. the wide lugs are the ones with the receiver screws in them.</div></div>

    Which was okay with the original AE, it didn't have the option for an adjustable cheek... but now the AE has adjustable cheek pieces, so the "lowest possible" height is not that big of a deal. and most are using scopes with bigger Objectives so "lowest possible" is not what it used to be.

    Remember too it's, 0 MOA, so no can't, it was designed to use the AI mount, however there are a lot more options that do much more than just hold the scope. So not being able to use these adds to the problem.

    I would rather be able to put the scope where I want than have the rail dictate.
     
    It was necessary to make some bedding when have you mounted the Murphy Precision rail for AE?
    I have received one yesterday and I want to put on the rifle tommorow morning...

    Thanks
    Cristi