Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Are they MEANT to be taken apart and reassembled for transport (or similar) frequently?
I would think they are not meant to be taken apart for transport as that would increase the chance of damaging the threads on the barrel.
I guess thats one bonus of the PSR. It came with some nifty screw on thread protectors for the stored barrels.
I wonder why they decided to change it from having to take the rail off on the PSR.
In an interview with Tom Irwin he said he transports all the demo rifles disassembled because he isn't sure how big the trunk of his rental car will be. As a guy who drives a small car I think it's a very appealing option.
You gonna check your zero every time?
In an interview with Tom Irwin he said he transports all the demo rifles disassembled because he isn't sure how big the trunk of his rental car will be. As a guy who drives a small car I think it's a very appealing option.
He said all the ones he's used have maintained zero. Check out the video on youtube.
SHOT Show 2014 Accuracy International AT and AX308 - YouTube
AINA does. A few actually.
Funny enough I have a PSR. It does have a little bit of shift. Around .1-.2mil
Hmmmm... maybe it wouldn't work, but it would be nice if it did. The guys says he transports the AXs in a 16"x12" case. That'd be a heck of a lot easier than even a 35" case. My next car and dwelling will be a Subaru BRZ and an 700 square foot apartment. Smaller is better.
They just flatted that shoulder. If you look instead of the rounded flange / shoulder on the barrel, it's flat.
I am sure with the PSR Contract they didn't want to have to take the rail off. Now there is no need unless you are changing the rail size.
I wonder why they decided to change it from having to take the rail off on the PSR.
I actually have been thinking about this system since the PSR was released. To me it is a solution looking for a problem. The previous generation AI rifles were pretty easy to change barrels and calibers with a few simple tools and seemed to work pretty well. If you think about it how many people actually take more than one caliber barrel to the range and shoot it every time they shoot except for zeroing and load development. The different calibers are there to fill different needs. If you are shooting ELR the 338LM would be the only barrel you need. If when you are shooting ELR and a target at 800 to 1K yards comes up are you really going to stop and "quickly change" barrels bolt and mags to a 260 or 308? Or if you are going to shoot short to semi long range (100 - 1K) are you really going to chew up barrel life on your 338LM or are you just going to shoot your 308 or 260? My point is most people set out to shoot at a specific course of fire each time the go shooting, well at least I do (I may be completely off on these assumptions and the PSR or quick change barrels be the best thing going, but I doubt it).
The fact that you can change a barrel(flattened shoulder) on the new AX-MC338 without removing the rail is a nice update to the PSR kit from last year.
Question:
Is this only because of the flattened-out barrel shoulder….. or are the rails actually different on the new AX MC338 than the PSR ???? I am curious if/when you get a new barrel for the PSR kit, will this new “barrel spec“ allow PSR owners to change a barrel without removing the rail.
Thank you.
I understand that. However that idea isn't exactly solid. You would have to shoot 3000 rounds (or something close to that) of 308 instead of the 338 just to break even instead of buying an AIAX 338 and that is using commercial ammo prices. This would be good to get a new shooter familiar with the weapon system but you don't get the same benefits training with a 308 as you do with a 338. Shooting a 308 to max effective isn't exactly the same thing as shooting a 338 to max effective, and if that is what you are going to do then that is how you need to train.The system was advertised to allow for mission specific tools and as a way for units to train with "cheaper" ammunition (similar to the Sig SSG3000 with it's rimfire conversion.)
Without calling AINA or Mile High etc, can anyone confirm if the barrels for the AW are compatible with the new quick lock barrel system. I have a AINA 6.5 CM barrel on the way for my AE/MK II and have an AT on order. I am wondering if the barrel will work for the AT. I may end up selling the AE if the barrel is compatible. I would like to keep both but Donald Trump I am not.
Dave,Your AINA AE/AW barrel will work. There is no difference in the barrel tenon. That was done so a replacement barrel wasn't model specific. UK AE barrels will not work on the AT.
No it would not fit, a portion of an AE barrel is not threaded due to the recoil lug on an AE. So it will not fully thread onto an AT or AW.Dave,
In post 10 in the following thread it's mentioned that the AW and AE barrel's are .003 off from each other;
http://www.snipershide.com/shooting...s/65711-verify-aw-barrel-ae-mk-i-correct.html
MHS states in post 11 that an AW barrel would fit an AT, but doesn't list that an AE barrel would;
http://www.snipershide.com/shooting...irst-look-accuracy-international-ax338mc.html
So to be more accurate, an AE barrel would fit an AT if it was an AINA barrel, which would be stock AINA barrels, and Tooley/Bartlein AINA (.260, etc.) barrels?
Thanks.
I understand there's a unthreaded section towards the shoulder on an AE barrel, but I don't see how that would prevent an AE barrel from threading onto an AW, although the reverse has potential problems.No it would not fit, a portion of an AE barrel is not threaded due to the recoil lug on an AE. So it will not fully thread onto an AT or AW.
That portion on an AE barrel that is not threaded is the same outside diameter as the threads. So when threaded on to an AT or AW the barrel will jam up where the threads end. An AW barrel can thread into an AE because the inside diameter of the recoil lug is slightly larger than the O.D. of the threads allowing it to thread all the way in without binding on anything.I understand there's a unthreaded section towards the shoulder on an AE barrel, but I don't see how that would prevent an AE barrel from threading onto an AW, although the reverse has potential problems.
That's not my question to Dave though.
It's been pointed out that there are slight dimensional differences between the AE and AW barrels, I'd like to know if this is true, and there's a very good chance that Dave would know the answer.
Thanks, I see what you mean (picture below for reference).That portion on an AE barrel that is not threaded is the same outside diameter as the threads. So when threaded on to an AT or AW the barrel will jam up where the threads end. An AW barrel can thread into an AE because the inside diameter of the recoil lug is slightly larger than the O.D. of the threads allowing it to thread all the way in without binding on anything.
I'd still be interested to know if the reported .003 difference is real or not.