Advantage of tremor reticle in spotting scope?

Pseudohero

Private
Minuteman
Sep 10, 2018
89
22
I have a Bushnell LMSS with a non tremor Horus reticle which I have gotten good use out of but want to step up the glass. Going to buy the Nightforce CFS and will probably select the mil xt s reticle. They have a tremor 4 version and I am trying to understand why anyone would pick that reticle.

Nightforce cfs

My primary purpose is shot spotting and I think the wind dots will only obscure my view and provide zero useful info. I suppose you could hold at the same dot if the shooter is using a tremor reticle and give them a quicker correction in the same language. “Move 1 dot right and 3 mils up.” Seems overly complicated and I’m too lazy to constantly move and level the spotter. I like to hold the reticle center target because I find shots that miss high don't miss too high and are easier to spot with no reticle in the way while still allowing me to give a correction. I have had no formal training in this but just seems to work best for me.

Am I missing something here? I assume they wouldn’t pay Horus to use this reticle for no reason.
 
if you were a team running Tremor reticles there could be value in spotter matching scope. but for a normal person mil-xt would be the way to go if you see any value in the CFS
 
If you understand wind value angles, gun numbers, and Horus' dot value for the cartridge being used, you could supply instant wind hold over information to the shooter without doing manual calculations.
 
Yes but:
1. I don't want to have to
Hold directly on target. Partially because I am lazy, and partially because I can spot better when I hold slightly below.
2. I like tremor reticles but feel
like the wind dots king of get in the way a little for sporrinf impacts. Having said that all of my rifles except huntin rifles will be outfitted with tremors some day