• Frank's Lesson's Contest

    We want to see your skills! Post a video between now and November 1st showing what you've learned from Frank's lessons and 3 people will be selected to win a free shirt. Good luck everyone!

    Create a channel Learn more
  • Having trouble using the site?

    Contact support

After Action for Mammoth Match

Blaster4

Sergeant
Full Member
Minuteman
Mar 28, 2005
357
3
Virginia
www.teamblaster.net
I was excited to see a new Tactical match that was within driving distance...there aren't that many here on the East Coast.

The lodging was nice and super convenient. The staff were very nice and the food was excellent.

We started with a match brief from the Match Director. It was good except I like to hear them ask who has medical training and where/if medical kits are available. We pray we never have to use them but it does bring a warm feeling to know you have a EMT in your group or that there is a med kit at your stage.

Group 5 was up early to start the match. It was cold but not unbearable. Everyone seemed to be appropriately dressed. The first stage we fired was the Tobacco Barn.

Tobacco Barn Stage...The RO started the brief as we looked out into a field and target sizes and which class would shoot what was rattled off...about 30 seconds into it there were 20 adult men saying "what?". I think it would have been easier to just have made up sheets that could be handed out to each team with the target sizes. It could have helped move things along faster. There were plenty of steel targets to engage on this stage except I doubt anyone ever shot anything other than the close stuff. Guys were just trying to grab 6 points out of there and only a handful of our group grabbed 3-4. I would bet that most teams played that stage the same way. Half of the steel out there wasn't engaged by our squad. Seemed like a waste of good targets.

Hide stage...this was a stage that many of us have seen before. Time started and you moved from one position into a hide and you engaged some targets...we had to range them all first but it was not hard to find the targets. The problems our squad was having was that none of us could see any impacts. During our match brief it was said that some of these stages were designed so that you could not even read your teammates trace...this must have been one of them. It didn't go well and I think we had 1 hit out of our squad. We had heard the squad before us had ZERO hits. Seems like a lot of effort to build the stage went for nothing. It was tough to hear competent shooters bang off 25 rounds and come away with a goose egg. Having a spotter on that stage was useless in our group.

Ridge Line stage...this was a nice stage. Easy to range and most guys shot this in the prone. Targets were clustered in an area and you could just range the biggest one and have the range for most of them which saved time. Engaging them was fine and if your spotter could see your impacts you had a good chance of making some points there. Our group shot that when the sun was going down and once the light was off that ridge impacts were hard to see...not really a big deal as long as you weren't the last guys to shoot in your squad.

Night Fire...Suad 5 drew the short straw and had to shoot this stage last. Night fires in general just suck...anyone that has shot these before know that it's only fun if it's the first time you have ever shot at night OR you have some high speed Night Vision Gear to use. Otherwise, Night fire stages are unnecessary. There was a lot of down time in our group for this stage (5 hours). I didn't like how the stage was set up either. The first target was set up so that you could see it with your scope in the prone but your bullet flight was actually impacting about 10 yards in front of you. This I think was unsafe and I didn't even bother engaging that target. Also since we were the last group to go we had targets that were hammered. There was no white paint left on any of them. Some guys made hits...I think a few guys hit 3 but nobody cleaned it. Talking to the groups that had gone earlier they said almost everyone was making 3. We got done that stage at 2300 local time.

Next day

Close range...This stage is similar to others I have shot before. You have to engage multiple targets at different ranges without touching your scope. Most of the time these stages are set up where the time precludes you from touching your scope so you just hold over or under to finish the stage. This stage was set up and you could only touch your scope during the prep time. Then you could not touch your scope again. Not really a big deal and even though the targets were tennis balls and golf balls... the targets were close enough to be shot. Problems here again were no impacts being visible. If your gun was on then you got a few. The spacing of the targets were hard to figure out and even the RO's said it would be a problem. Reason this was an issue was that you had to call out which ball you were shooting at and the RO had to confirm it...if you shot a ball and the RO thought you were shooting a different ball then you didn't get credit for shooting that target...even though he saw you hit it. It burned a couple of guys in our group.

Red Barn stage...Lots of steel here on this stage. Ranging them wasn't difficult and the RO's here were very good. There were 2 firing positions at this stage and I would say our group engaged the most targets at this stage. Impacts were visible and adjustments could be made.

The prize table was full and everyone went home with something. There were three classes of shooters (military, open, and heavy) I think the heavies could have been bunched in with the open guys. I'm sure the 308 guys were happy to measure themselves against other 308's.

The RO's shot the match previously and were counted in the match...I'm not really sure how I feel about this. It seems there could be a conflict of interest...the guy who has a score already in the books should not be able to take points away from another shooter. Plus you will always have the comments on ideal shooting conditions, who set the targets out there, etc...not saying that the RO's and staff are not of pristine character...it just seems like it's a conversation that always happens when RO's shoot matches and are counted in your match. Give them their own prizes after they shoot and be done with it. Let the paying competitor's shoot for what's left over.

There was a lot of down time. Some of it could have been avoided by having more than one shooter up on the line ready to go. Also, in the information on round count about this match...at the brief it was said that you could shoot a maximum of 25 rounds at each stage. That should have been put out in the beginning. I think on the website it says 100 rounds (always bring a little extra) I'm pretty sure nobody ran out of ammo but I'm sure some guy's got close...I know one guy who finished well had only 1 round left.

I'm not sure I would shoot this match again in it's current form. Great prize tables are good but they arent the only thing. A great course of fire is what brings most of us back time and time again. Shooting over 100 rounds and the <span style="font-style: italic">winners barely hit 25% </span><span style="font-weight: bold">(this info was incorrect...they shot in the 50%)</span> of them isn't up there on my list of things to do again. It was said by the Match Director that the RO's had lost $1000 from their other jobs to be here for the match...ok...so what. How much money do you think the rest of us have spent to shoot this match? There are other matches with very similar terrain and is all UKD and it doesn't have half the prize table but I would rather shoot that match...even in the winter. Not seeing your impacts makes for a long day...at any match. The targets were big enough and I didn't think any of the positions I shot from were bad...each shot felt "good"...my data was off and without a shot call it added up to a lot of rounds into the dirt.

Thank you to the Staff and RO's that put on the match...it was clear that a lot of work had gone into it. Big Thanks to the sponsors for offering up great prizes.

I did have a great time seeing old friends and helping the new shooters that were in my group. I hope this match evolves and becomes a premier match since it has all the right ingredients...just depends on what direction they want to go. Hopefully they are open to making some changes.

Be safe, shoot well

Respectfully,

--KJ
 
Re: After Action for Mammoth Match

I have to agree with Kevin on this one. I found myself only milling 25% of the targets. My partner and I were calling it the low hanging fruit -- we only milled what we felt we could hit within the time allowed. Was this what the match director ment for us to do? I have to doubt it because it is a lot of work to put so many targets out there -- especially that far away.

The facility has alot to offer. Now it is a question of whether the full potential will be realized.
 
Re: After Action for Mammoth Match

As an RO that shot the match, let me first say that I was not one of the top finishers. My percentage of targets hit was right at 37%. There were multiple shooters with over 50% hits on the targets available for the match.

As for leaving the prize table to the paying customers, we were given an option to either shoot for fun or pay entry fee to be eligible for prizes. Some chose to pay and others didn't. The ones who paid entry went to the prize table.
 
Re: After Action for Mammoth Match

i have to pretty much concur with kevin.

the match was challenging to say the least. the staff, the sponsors and rockcastle were all great and my hats of to you!

there is definately some serious potential for this match. i think over all it went well for being the first time. i know you can't please everyone and joe made that clear. although when you have the caliber of shooters at a match like this and most scores were in the 10 to 20% hit ratio, i think some things need re thought. i like to blast lead as much as anyone but not being able to correct for much was frustrating at times.

my .02

dg
 
Re: After Action for Mammoth Match

That's a fair statement...I was incorrect. The winners did shoot better than 25% and may have been 50%... I should have added up the total targets.

As to where I placed in this match is irrelevant. I have beat Tim, John, Patrick, Clark, and George at other matches...I'm sure luck had much to do with it. On any given day any of my fellow shooters can win. Some days are better than others. Had I won my class at this match my AAR would be the same.

Respectfully,

--KJ
 
Re: After Action for Mammoth Match

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: bfshooting</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I think it does matter. If you are going to talk smack about a match then you should tell everyone how you placed in the match. </div></div>

fill out your profile please.

thanks,

dg
 
Re: After Action for Mammoth Match

I have absolutely no dog in this fight what so ever, but I will defend KJ, he has been attending matches for a very long time and everyone considers him a true professional.

he and I have gone round and round in person over match course of fire, but he is never malicious in his criticism.

I will stand up for KJ, trying to say he wrote that because of his placement is off base, clearly as an RO you are being driven by emotion, and I will say your accusations are without merit. He is the same, Top 10 or middle 20... dislike it all you want but he does this a lot, and is honest and fair in his assessments and believe me I have debated him on similar issues for hours. They come from a positive place.
 
Re: After Action for Mammoth Match

You know the whole leave the prize table for the paying customers doenst hold any water with me honestly. I spoke with Joe prior to the match, RO's got their room covered for ROing, if they wanted a shot at the table then they had to pay the entrance fee as well.

KJ I am not going to argue with you but I know you and I have discussed other matches including some 3 gun stuff. Most 3 gun matches the RO's get to go to the prize table just like everyone else in order of finish. Look at most major 3 gun matches RO's shoot prior to everyone else in them as well.

As to saying that the RO's have an advantage over weather, well that is just luck of the draw as to when you shoot.

I am sure that everything that has been said is going to be taken into consideration. For those that have shot the Cup and the Bash and other matches, did you shoot the very first one? Has it evolved over time? Remember this was the very first match the has been held at Rock Castle and Mr Harris has put on. Give it time but also remember this is called a challenge for a reason.

How many shooters can say that they were in their comfort zone the entire match?
 
Re: After Action for Mammoth Match

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: bfshooting</div><div class="ubbcode-body">well the guy that came in first place had never shot a long range match before this one. He bought his bolt gun the second week of December and won the match. So if KJ has shoot a lot of long range matches, and so much long range experience than he should have beat a guy that had never shot a long range match before this one. Because KJ said him self if this match was so hard then hitting a target was not luck. Also I think this is a great match to show what you've got when it comes to shooting. </div></div>

Who, John Sommers, Clark Kennedy or the guy shooting in the military, I can't read his name...

Looks like overall Clark had the highest score and then John Sommers, who all shoot a ton of matches... so whoever this wonder shooter was, I don;t see him in either of those squads where I can read the score... He does appear to be 4 points behind John Sommers though ?

You just sound like you have sour grapes over constructive criticism. Take it like a professional and move along instead of making up excuses like his score influenced his opinion, when clearly you dont know the guy.
 
Re: After Action for Mammoth Match

I don't have a dog in the fight but I did shoot the match and John Summers was the overall winner and did it with style. Clark was 9 points behind him but did win the heavy class. I don't remember the name of the guy that won the military but he did an awesome job and had over 26 points but was not the overall winner.

Dustin
 
Re: After Action for Mammoth Match

Kevin you were the other guy shooting the .243 with me in squad 5.

It was very fun shooting this match with everyone. I think I probably had one of the lowest hit percentages haha. But I had a ton of fun and enjoyed learning. Cant wait to shoot it again and see how much improvement will be made over the next match.
 
Re: After Action for Mammoth Match

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: bfshooting</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Dgunn what does my profile matter? </div></div>
bfshooting, you will be harrased repeatedly by members until you fill in your profile I.E (Where you are from).
It's just a thing that they ask you to fill in if you post on this site........Call it site rules if you will.
Have you ever heard; "When in Rome.......Do as the Romans"?
Welcome to the Hide as well.
......SmokeRolls
 
Re: After Action for Mammoth Match

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: bfshooting</div><div class="ubbcode-body">This wonder shooters name is Jermy Parker, and yes he did come in first place for military. He was in the same squad as Clark. We shot with Clark all weekend. There is a difference between constructive criticism and telling people not to shoot the match. I don't care to know the guy, and its clear that that he couldn't take the challenge of the course of fire good luck in bench rest. </div></div>

You're a fool, log out and don't come back here if you're just gonna be an ass and attack the man for his opinion, especially someone like him.

You can man up and do it yourself or I can show you the door for 30 days... nothing he wrote said for people to not shoot the match. To be frank, this opinion seems to be shared based on a couple of posts here I have read, you're just making it worse.
 
Re: After Action for Mammoth Match

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Lowlight</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I have absolutely no dog in this fight what so ever, but I will defend KJ, he has been attending matches for a very long time and everyone considers him a true professional.

he and I have gone round and round in person over match course of fire, but he is never malicious in his criticism.

I will stand up for KJ, trying to say he wrote that because of his placement is off base, clearly as an RO you are being driven by emotion, and I will say your accusations are without merit. He is the same, Top 10 or middle 20... dislike it all you want but he does this a lot, and is honest and fair in his assessments and believe me I have debated him on similar issues for hours. They come from a positive place. </div></div>
I am the RO who commented above. Not sure what you mean by "driven by emotions". I only stated hit percentages and entry fees. KJ is entitled to his opinion. Just making sure the exaggerated numbers given were more realistic. As an RO, my only emotion was that I hope everyone had a good time and hopefully will return. If not then thanks for attending and it was a pleasure running the match with the group of shooters that attended.

 
Re: After Action for Mammoth Match

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: bmarc69</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Lowlight</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I have absolutely no dog in this fight what so ever, but I will defend KJ, he has been attending matches for a very long time and everyone considers him a true professional.

he and I have gone round and round in person over match course of fire, but he is never malicious in his criticism.

I will stand up for KJ, trying to say he wrote that because of his placement is off base, clearly as an RO you are being driven by emotion, and I will say your accusations are without merit. He is the same, Top 10 or middle 20... dislike it all you want but he does this a lot, and is honest and fair in his assessments and believe me I have debated him on similar issues for hours. They come from a positive place. </div></div>
I am the RO who commented above. Not sure what you mean by "driven by emotions". I only stated hit percentages and entry fees. KJ is entitled to his opinion. Just making sure the exaggerated numbers given were more realistic. As an RO, my only emotion was that I hope everyone had a good time and hopefully will return. If not then thanks for attending and it was a pleasure running the match with the group of shooters that attended. </div></div>

I confused the two names, and apologize to you for mixing that up...
 
Re: After Action for Mammoth Match

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Lowlight</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: bmarc69</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Lowlight</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I have absolutely no dog in this fight what so ever, but I will defend KJ, he has been attending matches for a very long time and everyone considers him a true professional.

he and I have gone round and round in person over match course of fire, but he is never malicious in his criticism.

I will stand up for KJ, trying to say he wrote that because of his placement is off base, clearly as an RO you are being driven by emotion, and I will say your accusations are without merit. He is the same, Top 10 or middle 20... dislike it all you want but he does this a lot, and is honest and fair in his assessments and believe me I have debated him on similar issues for hours. They come from a positive place. </div></div>
I am the RO who commented above. Not sure what you mean by "driven by emotions". I only stated hit percentages and entry fees. KJ is entitled to his opinion. Just making sure the exaggerated numbers given were more realistic. As an RO, my only emotion was that I hope everyone had a good time and hopefully will return. If not then thanks for attending and it was a pleasure running the match with the group of shooters that attended. </div></div>

I confused the two names, and apologize to you for mixing that up... </div></div>
No problem sir. That's what I figured when I went back and read what was said after me.
 
Re: After Action for Mammoth Match

Guys relax. Everyone is entitled to there opinion. I read everyones and will take in all that is said.

I am more concerned with people enjoying themselves than how many hits everyone had.

Remember it is only a competition, let's not get all worked up over it. At the end of the day, we are all on the same side.
 
Re: After Action for Mammoth Match

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: bfshooting</div><div class="ubbcode-body">don't cross kj you'll get in trouble this is like IDPA</div></div>
You remind me of a hypothetical kid that kicked a skunk even when everyone told him not to.
...SmokeRolls
 
Re: After Action for Mammoth Match

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: bfshooting</div><div class="ubbcode-body">don't cross kj you'll get in trouble this is like IDPA </div></div>

Quit being a fool. KJ or anyone on this forum is entitled to a non-malicious opinion.
 
Re: After Action for Mammoth Match

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: bfshooting</div><div class="ubbcode-body">well the guy that came in first place had never shot a long range match before this one. He bought his bolt gun the second week of December and won the match. So if KJ has shoot a lot of long range matches, and so much long range experience than he should have beat a guy that had never shot a long range match before this one. Because KJ said him self if this match was so hard then hitting a target was not luck. Also I think this is a great match to show what you've got when it comes to shooting. </div></div>

Get off Kevins ass, There were many guys that thought the same way. The match was chalanging, I had a great time. But, I would make the same assesment as Kevin. By the way Kevin has been shooting these types of matches as long as I can remember and did his time in the USMC as a Scout Sniper , He is definatly not a Benchrester.

Jeremy the top 308 shooter, is a great shooter and is a sponsered 3 gun shooter, and a hell of a nice guy I might add. But there is some definate home field advantage here, he is sponsered by Rockcastle Shooting Center. I think he knows the place well.

110 - # of shooters
55 - (if I counted correct) Possible Points

Only 10 shooters got 20 or more targets.

There were more that got 3 or less

Shooter after actions are a good thing R.O's and Directors can use the feedback to put on better matches. Most of the time when a first time match is held a after action sheet is passed out to everyone to privatly fill out so the match director can use the input to better the next match.

Again, I liked the match but I can also see the points being made here. Hopfully it will be helpfull in planning future matches.
 
Re: After Action for Mammoth Match

Here is the deal. Kevins assesment was right on, in fact, maybe even a little generous.

I shot like shit at this match, no one to blame but me and I don't blame Joe or the ROs or anyone else for that. I fucked up the easy stage...nothin I can say about that other than I should have left with four more points and I didn't.

In fact, the ROs did a great job with what they were given. I want to thank them for doing it.

The stages, in general were not well explained, the target sizes were (two in particular) were not standardized. I left every stage briefing confused as to what I could or couldn't do and what I had to do. If this was part of the "challenge" then...cool, but it was not a measure of shooting ability or planning or communication, etc.

The part that bothers me the most is that in three days of shooting, we actually shot for less than half an hour on five scored stages.

I genuinely hope these comments are not taken as bitching because I did poorly, that was all me. They are intended as suggestions to improve in the future. It was a fun match and an amaizing venue. I hope it get better.
 
Re: After Action for Mammoth Match

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: bfshooting</div><div class="ubbcode-body">don't cross kj you'll get in trouble this is like IDPA </div></div>This is nothing like IDPA, but of course you already know that.

By disrespecting Kevin you are only hurting your own reputation and that of the people you claim to represent. I have found Kevin's past criticisms, of me included, to be spot-on. When I choose to listen to him about matches, course design, targets and strategy, I learn. What makes his criticism so effective is that - like him - it is never mean, malicious or self-serving. He often sees the truth that many who have a stake in the outcome try hard to to ignore. So it takes a person secure in his own knowledge, skills and abilities to accept and respond intelligently to what Kevin has to say. Kevin need not apologize for that.
 
Re: After Action for Mammoth Match

In hopes that this thread doesn't result in name calling, here is what I took away.

After every stage brief except the Hide Site stage, most of the shooters in my squad looked at each other with a lot of confusion. There were numerous questions that came from shooters that could have been addressed in the brief. Most of the stage briefs were not very concise and after speaking with other squads, the stage rules were not consistent from squad to squad.

Several shooters in my squad got burned by not advising the R.O. of the correct target. They would get a hit, but would not get credit if the shooter called the wrong one. In most of the stages, this was very easy to do. If a stage is timed, you don't want to waste seconds making sure the R.O. is spotting the target you are on.

I also think that the target condition should be the same for everybody. Paint on the targets can make a big differnce. I understand it adds time to reset the stage, but it can be set up to be done quickly.

There was alot of down time compared to the amount of time shooting. I realize this is the first match and teething problems will always occur. With the amount of space Rock Castle has, I think this could have been cut in half.

Setting up a challenge is one thing. But don't get carried away. Shooters have a good time hitting targets, not sending 25 rounds down range to get just a few hits. I come to these matches to learn and have a good time. Alot of the guys in my squad said they were only concentrating on getting 1 or 2 hits in a stage that may have had 10 targets.

I think this match has tons of potential. The facility is perfect. The lodge is a bit out dated but adequate. Being in the middle of the range is very nice. The people at Rock Castle were super friendly and easy going. Got to speak with the owner it seems he is very interested in keeping this going.

I would like to say thank you to the R.o.'s for dealing with cold and being patient with some cranky dudes. The cold weather put some guys in pissy mode.

Also, thank you to the sponsors for a great prize table.

I hope this is taken as constructive and not bitching. I would like to come back to this event if some changes are made.

John Busby
 
Re: After Action for Mammoth Match

Hey guys I am definitely no "wonder shooter" just someone who works really hard at doing something good.

KJ, I agree that the match was difficult but it lived up to its name, I expected no less and prepared for just that. I agree that not seeing impact certainly makes tough for corrections but thats what I thought trace was all about? Being new to the LR shooting, during practice, I kept finding myself trying to make corrections based on impact and worked hard to focus more on reading the trace.

I don't think I am talking out my ass here but it sounds like this match may have brought alot of people out of their "comfort zone" (and I ain't talking about the weather).

I would say that (for me) there may have been a few targets that were in outer space, so I just chose not to shoot at them. Heck I thought maybe they were meant for the Open guys anyways, but you can bet I'll be practicing on some tennis balls at 700 yards!

The night shoot was short and sweet and I did see quite a few guys digging trenches in the ground, set up that way on purpose? I would say.....yes, I just popped pods all the way out and scooted a little left, nobody said we could not.

Like the man said, everyone is entitled to their opinions.

I do look forward to meeting more of you guys in the future, hopefully you will come back and enjoy KY for the next one!

Jeremy
 
Re: After Action for Mammoth Match

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Jeremy Parker</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Hey guys I am definitely no "wonder shooter" just someone who works really hard at doing something good.

</div></div>


I dont know it says under your name that you are. LOL

Great Shooting!!!!!
 
Re: After Action for Mammoth Match



Night Fire... The first target was set up so that you could see it with your scope in the prone but your bullet flight was actually impacting about 10 yards in front of you. This I think was unsafe and I didn't even bother engaging that target.

I agree with Kevin on this. Safety issues went from one extreme to another. I should of known better, but unlike Kevin, I did decide to engage on the target with grass in my crosshairs, I squeezed off three rounds to dig a trench in the dirt before I realized what was happening. Just glad I didn't connect with a rock under the surface and get anybody hurt. On the flip side, There were other stages RO's made me remove the bolt/carrier and charging handle from my AR. No big deal really, I'm all for safety, I just thought a chamber flag and no mag would suffice.

Other than that I had fun a learned a ton and hope to be back. I just hope the more experienced match shooters really consider coming back to the next match as I would have to think changes will be made.
 
Re: After Action for Mammoth Match

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: A10XRIFLE</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Jeremy Parker</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Hey guys I am definitely no "wonder shooter" just someone who works really hard at doing something good.

</div></div>


I dont know it says under your name that you are. LOL

Great Shooting!!!!! </div></div>

Haaaa, holy crap, you know that one will stick!!

Great meeting you George
 
Re: After Action for Mammoth Match

Objective assessments like Drake's are important to us trying to get started. Thank you.
I think he was spot on for someone trying to decide whether to make the commitment to an event like this.
Joe shouldn't change his standards.... Maybe there where a few too many warm bodies there this weekend that slowed it up for the A- Team guys, sorry.... I was one of them.
Maybe this was not really the place for everyone with the little bit of experience I have unless they have a good sense of humor. It was a little difficult to keep that sense of humor hitting only 2 targets all weekend and spending $400.
If a guy only has one or two opportunities to get out to a match like this a year this might not be the place to start. I'll try to get back next year.
I did learn how the big boys operate. Most important....I know how to practice for the hard ones now and that was what Joe wanted us newbies to go away with. I think there are a lot of guys trying get started and they need these assesments to make decisions. We just have to get out and shoot but be ready for tough weekends.
This was a serious challenge for a newbie. Great experience.
 
Re: After Action for Mammoth Match

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Lowlight</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
You just sound like you have sour grapes over constructive criticism. Take it like a professional and move along instead of making up excuses like his score influenced his opinion, when clearly you dont know the guy. </div></div>

+1

Kevin is my Team Mate and when one or two of us can't make a match we rely on the person who went to give an honest no shit down and dirty report on a match. Seems like he gave it. I will take it at face value as he has never let me down on an AAR and wouldn't come in here to let others know if he didn't want to help.

Also, I have gotten similar reports from other experienced shooters, who are major match shooters and who were there, so to disregard Kevin due to his placing and screaming sour grapes would be a mistake.

Matches that can take constructive criticism will continue to grow and get better. Those that can't due to emotions and egos won't. Sounds like this match has an outstanding location so hopefully the match director and RO's will take the constructive criticism for what it is and make the match better and not let emotion and ego get in the way.

I do wonder something, has the match director or RO's shot major sniper style matches anywhere else? If not maybe they should to get a feel of how they are run and set up to take that back and make improvements. Maybe they can make it down to Rifle's Only for the Cup, which is arguably the Super Bowl of sniper matches.
 
Re: After Action for Mammoth Match

How does one count the hit ratio? 5 stages with a possible 25 rounds each and a night stage with 9 rds is a lot of possible shots and I saw a lot of guys dump all 25 rds with 1 hit.
Or is it calculated by the total number of hits against possible targets? Anyone know how many rounds the top shooters got off, that would give a more accurate hit assessment I think.
Had I fired 9 rounds to hit the 4 night stage targets, would that be 100%?

As for the round count, one could have theoretically fired 134 rounds.
As for Kevins assessment, I think he was spot on, Great potential, the Rock Castle folks and environment could not have been better but there are growing pains.

Thanks go out to everyone involved in this shoot, a lot of work went into it by both shooters and Staff.

Thanks.
 
Re: After Action for Mammoth Match

I wonder if there was something about this match that made it advantageous for 3-gun afficinados? Jeremy and Jeff Cramblit were 1-2 in military, neither with much if any "sniper match" experience. Both are top notch 3-gunners. Trapr finished strongly and he shoots a ton of 3-gun and not many sniper matches. I finished 6th which isn't the greatest but I was elated given the level of competition and I've got a 3-gun background (6th in open class that is)

I can't think of anything specific, but it does make me wonder why a number of relatively inexperienced sniper match shooters finished at or near the top.
 
Re: After Action for Mammoth Match

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: DT1</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I wonder if there was something about this match that made it advantageous for 3-gun afficinados? Jeremy and Jeff Cramblit were 1-2 in military, neither with much if any "sniper match" experience. Both are top notch 3-gunners. Trapr finished strongly and he shoots a ton of 3-gun and not many sniper matches. I finished 6th which isn't the greatest but I was elated given the level of competition and I've got a 3-gun background (6th in open class that is)

I can't think of anything specific, but it does make me wonder why a number of relatively inexperienced sniper match shooters finished at or near the top. </div></div>

Their ability to "game" the stage and come in with a nontypical solution to the stage.?.?
 
Re: After Action for Mammoth Match

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Chiller</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: DT1</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I wonder if there was something about this match that made it advantageous for 3-gun afficinados? Jeremy and Jeff Cramblit were 1-2 in military, neither with much if any "sniper match" experience. Both are top notch 3-gunners. Trapr finished strongly and he shoots a ton of 3-gun and not many sniper matches. I finished 6th which isn't the greatest but I was elated given the level of competition and I've got a 3-gun background (6th in open class that is)

I can't think of anything specific, but it does make me wonder why a number of relatively inexperienced sniper match shooters finished at or near the top. </div></div>

Their ability to "game" the stage and come in with a nontypical solution to the stage.?.? </div></div>

Your closer than you think on that actually. There were a couple of stages that you could "game". I.E. think the Tobacco Barn stage.....and if anyone heard me throwing around a quote "No Joe I'm going to shoot this stage like a man" it applied to that stage.

All but 3 RO's completely bypassed the long distance portion and went straight down to the closer range diamond/circle plates.

One thing to consider is you had to be smart about the target selection.

For instance on the tobacco barn the best order if you had a good Mil reading was to shoot the closest 3 plates up top, and then run down and engage diamond/circle from the 3 shooting positions.

For the Red Barn....run up again engage the 3-4 big plates that were easy to find, then run down and engage the lower portion.
 
Re: After Action for Mammoth Match

First I want to thank Rockcastle, the RO's and the Sponsors for their efforts with this match. Putting matches together is hard work and I'm greatly appreciative.

I have to second what Drake and Lester stated above. If it is questioned, I shot like crap in this match. Even if I had shot well, I would feel the same. I have shot poorly at other matches and have returned if I felt the match was run well. As for this match, I do not believe I will be returning for the summer match. I think I will let others kick the tires on that match to see if things change.

I have very little to add to this AAR. It would have been nice to see trophies, plaques or metals awarded to the winners for their efforts. Prizes are great, but awards recognize the sacrifices that were made.

I hope that the AAR's are not taken as bashing but more as constructive criticism to make the match better in the future. Rockcastle Shooting Center has huge potential.
 
Re: After Action for Mammoth Match

I agree with many of the comments of the match, this is only my 3rd "sniper" type match, but have shot hundreds of pistol and 3 gun matches and seen matches run well and somewhat lacking and the only way for them to "get better" is to get feed back, so I think it is our responsibility to give that honestly or don't expect anything to change. Some have taken that input and used it while others have not, it's their option as they are the ones taking the time to put it together and it's our option as to return. There are certain events I don't spend my money to ever go back too, trust me!

I think target breaks for different division should have been unique shapes, so it was easier to identify where the breaks were for the shooters, a bunch of squares and diamonds isn't adequate as if you don't see one you could start on the wrong target and waste time and bullets

I think calling your target is neccessary in most cases to let the spotter get on target. I said most, tobacco barn were there were only two targets from forward position after you called and hit the first on it's kinda obvious were you are going next, silly!

I think shooters having to remain well away from stage is neccessary on some stages, not all, and standing in the shade instead of the sun was a big difference when it was hours.

I think having targets get progressively harder, by going from seeing impact zones to not to broken forest background allows much more learning and enjoyment than launching into the wilderness, no specific stage referenced.

I know Joe but had never shot one of his matches, I came in second in military division behind Jeremy, I shot a 308 gas gun, as a 3 gun kinda guy it is only natural, I know Jeremy well and he is one of the finest gentlemen I know and I know how many hours he spent getting ready and working with his more than capable spotter. Alot of this match was about your spotters ability more than the trigger pulling. He had great equipment and put in lots of time, and he comes from 3 gun as I do and we are a vary adaptable bunch. I just shot more bullets than him, his just hit more. I shot 24,24,24,8,24,12, should have slung a couple more on the last stage and maybe I could have caught him
smile.gif


I think the Rockcastle facility and sponsors were outstanding for this type of event and possibly others. I hope all the input is taken to heart and makes this match even more fun for those who choose to come.
 
Re: After Action for Mammoth Match

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Chiller</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: DT1</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I wonder if there was something about this match that made it advantageous for 3-gun afficinados? Jeremy and Jeff Cramblit were 1-2 in military, neither with much if any "sniper match" experience. Both are top notch 3-gunners. Trapr finished strongly and he shoots a ton of 3-gun and not many sniper matches. I finished 6th which isn't the greatest but I was elated given the level of competition and I've got a 3-gun background (6th in open class that is)

I can't think of anything specific, but it does make me wonder why a number of relatively inexperienced sniper match shooters finished at or near the top. </div></div>

Their ability to "game" the stage and come in with a nontypical solution to the stage.?.?</div></div>

Actually, I think you are correct. Maybe not "game" a stage in the traditional, negative context, but looking at a stage and figuring out the best and most effective way to shoot it given your abiliy.

Things like the tennis balls at 600yds + etc didn't bother me a bit, I just skipped them and focused on hitting the big stuff. Did that on each stage, hit 2-6 targets per stage and wound up 6th.

There were a bunch of targets due to size and/or distance that most people would consider "unhittable" or "impractical" but I didn't even think about them, simply moved on to the 12x12, 6x12, 18x24 targets that I could hit.
 
Re: After Action for Mammoth Match

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: DT1</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I wonder if there was something about this match that made it advantageous for 3-gun afficinados? Jeremy and Jeff Cramblit were 1-2 in military, neither with much if any "sniper match" experience. Both are top notch 3-gunners. Trapr finished strongly and he shoots a ton of 3-gun and not many sniper matches. I finished 6th which isn't the greatest but I was elated given the level of competition and I've got a 3-gun background (6th in open class that is)

I can't think of anything specific, but it does make me wonder why a number of relatively inexperienced sniper match shooters finished at or near the top.</div></div>

1. Great Shooters
2. Great Spoters
3. Home Field Advantage

The top scores in the Open catagaory were all Top shooters at Nation wide Big Matches


Honestly, I shot like Crap on day one. I only scraped my 3rd place finish becouse of a Great Day 2.
 
Re: After Action for Mammoth Match

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: A10XRIFLE</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Jeremy Parker</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Hey guys I am definitely no "wonder shooter" just someone who works really hard at doing something good.
</div></div>
I dont know it says under your name that you are. LOL
Great Shooting!!!!! </div></div>
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Jeremy Parker</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
Haaaa, holy crap, you know that one will stick!!
Great meeting you George</div></div>

Yeah, no getting away from that one, wonder boy :p

Congrats to some great shooting!

I better get on it or I'll get my ass handed to me all this season as well...
 
Re: After Action for Mammoth Match

I shot with Kevin and Tony all weekend there good friends
I read Kevins AAR before he posted it and told him I agreed
100% with it. He did not write it just to bash the match
we all agreed the match and facility have alot of potential.
The porpose of the AAR is to let the match director know what
you thought about the match. The comments about the RO's
shooting for score isnt comparitable to ipsc the hits are
up to the judgement of the RO on long range steal and at 700+
yards that can be difficult to see and there is always a home
field advantge when fellow competitors have not ever shot at
the range the match is being held at. Kevin wasnt whining
about wanting and easier match. Just a few changes to make the
next one a little better with less down time, gaming, and
foggy stage descriptions

Jeff
 
Re: After Action for Mammoth Match

I did not shoot this match, but watched several squads on different stages on Saturday. In my opinion there were several things that helped the guys who came out on top:

accurate range estimation
good communication with their spotter and RO
ability to break down a stage to exploit their strengths
good rifle dope

Where does the home field advantage come in? I'm pretty sure (reasonably certain) none of the guys who have been to Rockcastle before this match have shot on the same "ranges" at anything close to the same distances that were used in this match.

smile.gif
It was enjoyable to watch, even with the temperatures.

Edit to add- I would like to thank Barrett for letting us by-standers shoot the .338. The guy w/ Barrett made a good wind call and I got two hits.
 
Re: After Action for Mammoth Match

One advantage 3 gunners have is we are used to shooting under an extremely tight clock, times matter down to the .01 second level, so I was under no pressure in the time limit arena at all, I've felt the same way in the few other precision matches I have shot as well I have only been up to Rockcastle about 5 times, 2 for 3 gun matches and one for the Practice session a few weeks ago so not sure there is really a home field advantage my 308 has only made two trips up there and I had never even seen one of those areas (ridge) and only shot in the valley where hide and tobacco barn were during practice weekend (50 rounds), never shot from red barn, but have driven by it, and only shot shotguns down by that dang tennis/ golf ball debacle ( 1 hit). It may be my ignorance but I think I should have hit about 8 more plates in that match with only minor stategy and prepatation changes, no changes to abilities, but that is all I feel I could have gotten so the match in my opinion is what Joe said it was, a real tough challange.

See ya'll again when I can fit it in, too bad there are not as many of these as pistol and 3 gun matches,

thanks I learned a bunch from shooting with the guys on our squad

jeff