All right, here is the lowdown. If you have read the book, or any of Flynn's, the movie doesn't hold a candle to the book. It seems that is always the case, regardless of the movie. Everything is different, the plot, the happenings, simply everything. Once you separate the movie from the book, it is an ok movie. I have seen much better, and I have seen much worse. If you have other things to do, I would do them. If it's a rainy day, and you don't have something going on, it's an ok flick to go see. One thing I was surprised by, was Keaton's acting job. I have never really cared for his acting, but I thought that he did a pretty good job transforming into the Hurley character. I didn't expect him to pull it off as well as he did, so that was a positive. I have read all of Flynn's books, and really like them, and was looking forward to the movie, but it could have been better. I'm still not sure how you can pack all of the detail from a 300 page book into a two hour movie without leaving out a lot of detail. Anyway, that's my take on it. If you see it, I hope it's enjoyable for you.