Anal cavity search. Wtf is wrong with you all

#3
Very few details in that article other than allegations from defense attorneys. It sounded like he may have run from the police upon their arrival, which makes it difficult for "hey y'all, this is my truck, and here's my ID to prove it".

From my own time in LE I know the first thing I did upon investigating a suspicious person was want to shoot him and jam my hand up his ass???? because that's a lot simpler than "hey man, whatcha doin?" It's slightly more difficult to have that polite conversation if I'm chasing or fighting you. Nor was I particularly interested in civil discourse afterward.
 
#4
yeah, something tells me he was not being polite and friendly with the officers......and had he complied, and not resisted arrest.....he likely wouldnt have been shot.

so i dont know what youre trying to do here other than attempt to bash LEO
 
#6
Some dumbass get shot trying to fight with police and you come out accusing then of a cover up.

youre dumb ass sounds just like those BLM tards, "he was just out spreadin the word of god!"

 
#8
Evidently he was breaking into his own truck. A fight with a cop who was interrupting him. Yeah i can see that. Even shooting him if the cop couldn't handle a fight, I can see that. But wanting to do an anal cavity search after this cluster duck well I found that weird.
 
#9
So, because a lawyer said someone attempted an anal cavity search, that means it happened that way?
1. Since when do you believe an attorney?
Next, you'll be telling us how Gloria Allred is completely altruistic and never makes false allegations.
2. If you read what the dumb ass said, he said they were "fumbling" with his behind.
My first thought would be that they were trying to get his wallet from his pants to ID him.
I guessing that the dumbass that got shot was being argumentative and refused to ID himself, which escalated the whole affair.
Not saying the officer was right.
 
#11
if he refused to identify himself, how would they establish that he owned the truck?
Take his word for it?
Maybe no one told you this, so, I'll break it to you now.
Criminal's lie all the time.
What would you think if someone broke into YOUR car, the cops happened on the event in progress, but, since the suspect didn't identify himself, they let him go?
 
#13
ArmyJerry said:
If I have to rely on the cops being there to protect me or my property I deserve every thing I get.
Click to expand...

so you keep an eye on all of your property 24/7?

and if someone was breaking into your car while you were at work, and cops rolled up, you wouldnt want them to stop the guy?...or do you have one of those " i dont call 911" stickers so theyll know not to help you?
 
#15
ArmyJerry said:
I live in Texas and I have neighbors. Good neighbors.
Click to expand...

LOL, this made me think of all the "They were a really nice guy/gal never would have thought they coulda..."

At the end of the day it doesn't matter if you want cops or not, the majority does (I guess they are not as billy bad ass as you and your neighbors are), if the majority didn't want law enforcement there would be no law enforcement. Just FYI refusing to provide identification when the police have a lawful reason to contact you is illegal... and you will be detained until the officers can establish your identity. I assume your "good neighbors" are always home and awake and alert... on a side note what are these good neighbors or even you for that matter going to do when you witness a misdemeanor in progress? Are you going to charge them with a crime? well you don't really have the authority to do that... are you going to detain them until the cops... oh wait that's right you don't believe in cops and you don't have the authority to detain anyone. OR are you going to go all vigilante on them? Yeah now you're the criminal... So I guess as long as you can articulate that your life or the lives of your loved ones was in immediate danger you can go ahead and take action.

Edit: FWIW, I have never needed to call the cops but I do see a need for police officers.
 
Last edited:
#16
ArmyJerry said:
Not I'd ing yourself is a right. Not being accosted by the government is a right too. Truth from a lawyer is suspect though.
Click to expand...

Thats true unless a motor vehicle is involved and then youre required to ID yorself, in most instances, ESPECIALLY if it seems it may be breaking ad entering. the cops seeing that is reasonable cause to request Id.
 
#17
ArmyJerry said:
I live in Texas and I have neighbors. Good neighbors. Armed neighbors. But nah even when I lived in Jersey I never felt the need for a cop.
Click to expand...

yeah boss......chances are you are more likely to be robbed by one of your "good neighbors" than you are by some random guy.

youd be surprised by the amount of "good" people who commit crimes
 
#18
you are funny, sad and weak but funny none the less

JW329 said:
LOL, this made me think of all the "They were a really nice guy/gal never would have thought they coulda..."

At the end of the day it doesn't matter if you want cops or not, the majority does (I guess they are not as billy bad ass as you and your neighbors are), if the majority didn't want law enforcement there would be no law enforcement. Seems more and more people are realizing we are living in a police state and not liking it, I think I am in the majority now so you best be careful begging to live in 100% safe places.

Just FYI refusing to provide identification when the police have a lawful reason to contact you is illegal... and you will be detained until the officers can establish your identity. Just an FYI that s unconstitutional and and just another reason I avoid police contact of any sort, they lack basic understanding of the oaths they take.

I assume your "good neighbors" are always home and awake and alert... on a side note what are these good neighbors or even you for that matter going to do when you witness a misdemeanor in progress? No they are not always home or awake but we are all armed and not as pussified as most cops I see shooting mfers because they get frightened too easily, Are you going to charge them with a crime? well you don't really have the authority to do that... are you going to detain them until the cops... oh wait that's right you don't believe in cops and you don't have the authority to detain anyone. Depending on their actions, and what they are doing, here in Texas citizens have all the authority we need, probably more than cops have in most situations, we aint sheep.OR are you going to go all vigilante on them? What is this Vigilante you speak of, if by that you mean protecting yourself , your neighbors or your property, well we call that justifiable violence here, permission not really needed. Yeah now you're the criminal... no I am a community citizenship gold medal winner So I guess as long as you can articulate that your life or the lives of your loved ones was in immediate danger you can go ahead and take action. Well they are all armed too and not pussies or easily scared into shooting people like the people where you are evidently. Man, you are servile, hows that feel, if you have kids do you spout this servile shit to them too? What does your wife think about that?

Edit: FWIW, I have never needed to call the cops but I do see a need for police officers. I see a need too but its not to look after my safety that's my responsibility.
Click to expand...

 
#19
ArmyJerry said:
you are funny, sad and weak but funny none the less
Click to expand...
dde01a7a92aa19b4972b4fb097b332686e4ba1f0771b47994b0f28c71f175383.jpg
 
#20
not going to stick up for the guy, but no its still unconstitutional , I just found the whole cavity search thing a bit weird, the mistaken confrontation with the vehicle owner the shooting, well we can all guess how many different scenarios could lead to that but fighting a guy then shooting him, then wanting to stick your hand up his ass just didn't smell right.
Maggot said:
Thats true unless a motor vehicle is involved and then youre required to ID yorself, in most instances, ESPECIALLY if it seems it may be breaking ad entering. the cops seeing that is reasonable cause to request Id.
Click to expand...

 
#22
I may be completely out of line here but here it goes.
If I had locked myself out of my car, that doesn't happen as I have an entry keys taped to the wiring or some other place on all of my vehicles, and the local police stopped by to check out why I was trying to get in I would be more than happy to show them my ID and tell them what was going on. Maybe they have an entry tool ie. slim jim that would make it easier. on all involved. I don't want to roll around in the mud and slush to get to that key I have under there.
I would not tell them to stuff it up their ass or even attempt to run as at my age running is a thing of the past. I would be nice and cooperative and not hassle the officer.
I am not a fan of our local LEOs as they have a revolving door down there as to keeping Good ones on, and I emphasize GOOD. The good ones go on to greener pastures where they pay better but our community is a gateway for them to get their Certs. etc.
If one wanted to Fist me, then Game on, I will fight and they know not what that Old Fart can do.
I find it to be that if you are polite and honest and don't run or give them a reason to fuck with you, things generally turn out for the better.
Just my thoughts, Regards, FM
 
#23
ArmyJerry said:
Not I'd ing yourself is a right. Not being accosted by the government is a right too. Truth from a lawyer is suspect though.
Click to expand...

Why the hell would you not want to ID yourself? That's stupid, unless you have a warrant out against you, hmmm? Why do you think a certain segment of the population is so adamant against Voter ID laws? Or maybe you're driving without a license or insurance, hmmm?

So, changing the scenario, here I am, a black man trying to break into my own truck and the cops come up. Because I'm not an idiot, I know they don't know who I am or that the truck belongs to me. Try this: "Hi, officers. My name is ____ and I locked myself out of my truck and I'm trying to get back in. Here's my driver's license/ID, and if you run the plates you'll find that the truck is registered to me." Problem solved, and at this point the officers probably try to see if there's anything they can do to assist him so they can get him on his way and off the street.

The cavity search accusation is BS and a money grab, buy you probably know that.
 
#32
ArmyJerry said:
all other comments aside I only posted this because they wanted to fist this guy up the ass and all of you are defending the cops other actions (speculating really) and think nothing of the dude getting fist fucked by the coppers. It reminded me of a awareness test I took a few years back on thought process.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ahg6qcgoay4
Click to expand...

That's because most of us are smart enough to deduce that IT NEVER HAPPENED, AND HE'S AFTER MONEY. There's no evidence, and there's no reason for the officers to do that on the street.
 
#40
Army Jerry---I am usually with you on most things, but this one I am not.
I am not a fan of LEOs but do not think it out of line for them to ask ID from someone they find breaking into a vehicle. No matter who it belongs to.
If it were my vehicle I would be pissed if they just drove by and did nothing.
As to the Fisting thing, I will believe that when I see the video tape from the stores cameras,
Why did he run? "I dinndo nuttin," I call Bull Shit. FM
 
#42
thats my question, was he running because they snapped on some latex gloves. did they charge him because he wouldn't "submit" or "comply", ;)

Foul Mike said:
Army Jerry---I am usually with you on most things, but this one I am not.
I am not a fan of LEOs but do not think it out of line for them to ask ID from someone they find breaking into a vehicle. No matter who it belongs to.
If it were my vehicle I would be pissed if they just drove by and did nothing.
As to the Fisting thing, I will believe that when I see the video tape from the stores cameras,
Why did he run? "I dinndo nuttin," I call Bull Shit. FM
Click to expand...

 
#45
Actually, i would be more worried about the fact that he WAS shot, not unsubstantiated claims they attempted a body cavity search.
A body cavity search requires a search warrant.
Did this defense attorney present the affidavit as proof?
he was in the fucking hospital, if they wanted something from his ass, all they would need to do is check his fucking bed pan.
 
Last edited:
#46
ArmyJerry said:
Not I'd ing yourself is a right. Not being accosted by the government is a right too. Truth from a lawyer is suspect though.
Click to expand...

Actually it's a bit of a fine line there.
The Supreme Court ruled (divided opinion) in Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada, that if the police decide to question / stop you based on what looks to be possibly criminal activity or suspicious activity, then you do have to tell them who you are (You don't have to provide ID if you don't have it, but you do have to identify yourself).

Generally speaking, refusing to identify yourself will usually at the very least get you a ride.
 
#47
get you a ride??? you mean kidnapped by armed agents of the state stasi style.

Generally speaking, the common man does not need a lawyer who is a member of a political party on a court to explain to him what is plain language of teh bill of rights. The more twisted the lawyers in black explaining why the constitution does not limit their power along with the governments power as it says in the 10th the less credibility they have.
 
#48
JW329 said:
LOL, this made me think of all the "They were a really nice guy/gal never would have thought they coulda..."

At the end of the day it doesn't matter if you want cops or not, the majority does (I guess they are not as billy bad ass as you and your neighbors are), if the majority didn't want law enforcement there would be no law enforcement. Just FYI refusing to provide identification when the police have a lawful reason to contact you is illegal... and you will be detained until the officers can establish your identity. I assume your "good neighbors" are always home and awake and alert... on a side note what are these good neighbors or even you for that matter going to do when you witness a misdemeanor in progress? Are you going to charge them with a crime? well you don't really have the authority to do that... are you going to detain them until the cops... oh wait that's right you don't believe in cops and you don't have the authority to detain anyone. OR are you going to go all vigilante on them? Yeah now you're the criminal... So I guess as long as you can articulate that your life or the lives of your loved ones was in immediate danger you can go ahead and take action.

Edit: FWIW, I have never needed to call the cops but I do see a need for police officers.
Click to expand...

The government only does and gives us what the majority wants? I don't think so, you might want to rethink that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Blue Sky Country
2A ALERT: VIRGINIA. VCDL URGENT LEGISLATIVE ACTION for pending gun bills. Salem gun show needs volunteers 01/18-19
Replies
9
Views
375
232593
232593
Maggot
Disturbing, this s from less than half a page of my browser.
Replies
0
Views
483
Maggot
Maggot
PatMiles
Police Perplexed: D.C. Carjackings Spike 111% After Lack of Prosecutions
Replies
38
Views
1K
Ronws
Ronws
PatMiles
Darrell Brooks Found Guilty of First-Degree Murder for All 6 Victims Killed in Waukesha Christmas Parade Massacre
Replies
49
Views
2K
Carlos Danger
Carlos Danger
PatMiles
January 6 committee withdraws subpoena against President Donald Trump
Replies
5
Views
1K
DIBBS
DIBBS
Top Bottom
Back
Home
Forums
Merch
Alerts