The current threads on Wolf, SK and Lapua ammo remind me of a question. I know that serious .22 shooters will order individual boxes of their favorite flavor from different lot numbers, then shoot them and order in quantity from the lot number that performs the best.
My own experience was that SK Rifle Match/Wolf Match Extra shot better than SK Standard Plus/Wolf Match Target. This would seem reasonable as the better performer was the more expensive. But, the Lapua Center X didn't shoot as well as the much less expensive SK Rifle Match/Wolf Match Target.
So the question is, if all of these various designations are nothing more than exactly the same round graded for performance, how in the hell can the less consistent ammo outperform the more consistent ammo? Remember, regardless of the box they come in, this ammo is reputedly all the same and is only graded on it's consistency.
My own experience was that SK Rifle Match/Wolf Match Extra shot better than SK Standard Plus/Wolf Match Target. This would seem reasonable as the better performer was the more expensive. But, the Lapua Center X didn't shoot as well as the much less expensive SK Rifle Match/Wolf Match Target.
So the question is, if all of these various designations are nothing more than exactly the same round graded for performance, how in the hell can the less consistent ammo outperform the more consistent ammo? Remember, regardless of the box they come in, this ammo is reputedly all the same and is only graded on it's consistency.