Anyone not like the AICS chassis? Why?

Re: Anyone not like the AICS chassis? Why?

OK guys, I guess I'm going to have to try to get behind one before I cast a verdict. With Mardi Gras going on down here and the issues I'm having with my PST, I haven't given the stock much thought in the last few days. All I do know right now is that I have to make a move to an AICS mag compatible bottom metal. The question is do I have my HSP cut for it or do I get the chassis?

Thanks for all of the replys. I almost made a blind decision and it's sounding like it may have been a mistake.
 
Re: Anyone not like the AICS chassis? Why?

Had one on a short action 700 in 243 for a couple hours, actually it was the makings of a 243 comp gun, and I wound up putting the action back into a factory ADL stock I did a little owrk on, just felt weird and was too heavy. Not to mention eye alignment was too funky to even try and fix with the adjustments on the comb, I think it was a 1.5 but don't hold me too it, I only owned that stock for about a day from delivery to handing it to my buddy and taking his Sig.
 
Re: Anyone not like the AICS chassis? Why?

I had the same problem a lot of people were posting about...... the comb being way too high. I modified my 1.5 cheek piece by shaving about .300" off the bottom of it and drilling 2 holes in the top of the stock for the bolts on the bottom of the cheek piece to recess into. It works great for me now.

That being said, I like my A5 more overall. The AICS is great for prone and porn, but that's where the love affair ends.
 
Re: Anyone not like the AICS chassis? Why?

I was able to get use to mine. Although I never really fell in love with it and thus sold her. Like LoneWolfUSMC I prefer the Mcmillan HTG (A1) stocks. They just feel right and that is what I'm putting on my next build. It's all a matter of personal taste/feel so see if you cant find an AICS chassis somewhere and crawl behind it.
 
Re: Anyone not like the AICS chassis? Why?

Hey rundm, Thanks for the tip. I like everything about my new 1.5 AICS except for the check riser, and was disappointed my Eagle check pad/pouch would not adapt because it blocked the Bolt from being removed. So after reading your post I just removed it and put on my Eagle pad and it feels great. I'm going to try it out in the morning.
Amazing the little tips you get on this web site and all the other Info too.
 
Re: Anyone not like the AICS chassis? Why?

i like them in all for funtionality and looks but kinda get sad when i look over and see 12 sticks that look like mine on the range this can always be fixed by a good krylon or other coating but i tend to favor the desert camo in eithers mcmillian a5 or my hs i have now
 
Re: Anyone not like the AICS chassis? Why?

Well guys, I think that I found the stock form for me. On a whim, I bought a B&C M40 stock. I really didn't think I was going to like it, but it was really comfortable and just felt right for me. I think I'm going to stick with this form of stock. I'm just going to have to bite the bullet and get into a McMillan.
 
Re: Anyone not like the AICS chassis? Why?

I have the problem of absolutely loving the aesthetics of the AICS, but no logical reason to back it up. I haven't even touched one IRL. I am a howa 1500 SA owner, and absolutely LOVE it. Have been thinking about a 700SA build just to acquire an AICS chassis.

Anyone know of a way to retrofit it to accept a Howa 1500 SA, and have one they want to get rid of?

I know, I know, "contact Pete lincoln". Well, he is wicked busy. And waaaay backed up. And i don't think i like the new AI Chassis with the pistol grip. I want that thumbhole type thing. (total fan-boy thing. No reAsoning to back it up)
 
Re: Anyone not like the AICS chassis? Why?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Jon Lester</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Does anyones trigger finger hit the badger knob on there remmington or is it just me? My Badger action is ok but the remmy hits the back of my first knuckle. </div></div>
I don't mean to hijack the thread, but this is a legitimate question that applies Remington 700s' mounted in AICS Chassis and other stocks, so I will answer this question throughly. It also applies to some other actions as well.

<span style="font-style: italic">Jon</span> - do you have large hands and/or is your hand "thick" at the web and knuckles? Maybe you wear gloves when shooting? The contact you are experiencing is typically caused by one or more of what I just mentioned, with the installation of tactical bolt knobs that <span style="font-style: italic">have the net effect of shortening the overall length of the bolt handle.</span> This is true of the Badger Bolt Knob as well as <span style="font-style: italic">nearly</span> every bolt knob around because the factory bolt knob is cut-off, the bolt handle shank is then shaped and threaded, and the new bolt knob is threaded-on. While the amount of "lost" handle length is small, clearance can become an issue for shooters' with large hands and/or thick fingers or who wear gloves.

What you need is more clearance at the knuckle, so what you need is really a longer bolt handle. Short of replacing the bolt handle, the only thing that I know of that might be able to fix your clearance problem is a Tac Ops Bolt Knob Conversion. I say <span style="font-style: italic">might</span> because you already have a Badger bolt knob installed, and your bolt handle has been shortened and threaded. Depending upon how short the handle of your bolt is, you should be able to improve clearance, and possibly eliminate - the contact at your index finger's knuckle by having a Tac Op's Bolt Knob Conversion installed. The problem is the threads - covering them up might require that they be welded-over, then the handle ground and re-shaped smooth and uniform. Thats' a PITA. I don't know how they've done it, but I do know that Mike Rescigno and <span style="font-weight: bold"><span style="font-style: italic">monteboy84</span></span> have fixed bolt handles that had Badger and other bolt knobs installed by others.

You should contact <span style="font-weight: bold"><span style="font-style: italic">monteboy84</span></span> here on the Hide' or over at Sniper Central, explain the contact problem that you are having, and ask him about installing a Tac Ops Bolt Knob Conversion. The conversion involves adding a hardened steel threaded stud that is TIG welded onto the bolt handle, which actually slightly lengthens the bolt handle. This will increase the clearance between your trigger finger and the bolt knob, as well as getting you a larger, easier-to-grasp bolt knob.

Check-out the photos below I borrowed from <span style="font-weight: bold"><span style="font-style: italic">monteboy84</span></span>'s <span style="font-weight: bold"><span style="font-style: italic">"Some bolt knob install pictures"</span></span> thread to see some great photos of the steps required to <span style="font-weight: bold"><span style="font-style: italic">correctly and cleanly</span></span> install a Tac Ops Bolt Knob Conversion, which is NOT a DYI install.

<span style="font-weight: bold"><span style="font-style: italic">Rob01</span></span> here has big mitts too and suffered from the same problem you had. Then Mike Rescigno of Tac Ops replaced the Badger knob on <span style="font-style: italic">Rob01</span>'s rifle with one of his Tac Ops Bolt Knob Conversions (which, BTW - was built by a well-known Hide gunsmith), and that gave Rob01 enough clearance that the problem was eliminated. Rob's bolt handle had been shortened when the Badger knob was installed, but the Tac Ops BKC still provided enough extra length to the bolt handle to solve Rob's clearance issue.

As I mentioned above, the Tac Ops Bolt Conversion actually adds more clearance by lengthening the bolt handle slightly through the installation of a hardened, threaded steel "bung". This is preferred over shortening the bolt handle as with most other knobs because shortening the bolt handle reduces the operating clearance between the bolt knob/fingers and the scope's ocular bell.

For the record, if for some reason, someone wants a short bolt handle as with other bolt knob installs the bolt handle just needs to be cut a bit shorter before the "bung" is TIG welded on. However, shortening the bolt handle somewhat defeats the purpose of changing the bolt knob because you are actually decreasing the <span style="font-style: italic">working clearance</span> between the scope's ocular bell and your fingers

Below are some photos I stole from <span style="font-weight: bold"><span style="font-style: italic">monteboy84</span></span>. They show photos of Tac Ops Bolt Knob Conversions he is doing in progress:
100_0001.jpg


100_0010.jpg


100_0011.jpg


100_0006.jpg


100_0008.jpg


100_0009.jpg


100_0002.jpg


100_0014.jpg


100_0017.jpg


100_0016.jpg


Check-out my post below this one for some of <span style="font-style: italic">monteboy84</span>'s post-grinding & sanding photos, as well as photos I shot of the bolt from my Tac Ops X-Ray 51 rifle compared to a bolt knob conversion (and bolt) from a competitor on and off of the respective rifles.


Keith
 
Re: Anyone not like the AICS chassis? Why?

<span style="font-weight: bold"><span style="font-style: italic">continued...</span></span>

Below are three post-shaping and sanding photos of a Remington 700 bolt <span style="font-style: italic">monteboy84</span> is modifying with the Tac Ops Bolt Knob Conversion:

100_0022.jpg


100_0023.jpg


100_0024.jpg


Shown below are some photos' of a Tac Ops Bolt Knob installed on a RH SA M700 bolt (from my personal X-Ray 51) and a competitor's bolt knob installed on a LH SA M700 bolt (from a friend's rifle built by a competitor). Keep in-mind that the competitor's bolt handle isn't even as short as most others, which are sometimes so short that the shooter can barely grasp the knob without fingers hitting the ocular bell.

And again, if for some strange reason someone actually wanted a shorter bolt handle this is easily accomplished by cutting the shank shorter before welding the threaded insert to the bolt handle. That said, compare the <span style="font-weight: bold">length of the handle and the diameter of the threaded shank</span> of the Tac Ops bolt to the length of the handle and the diameter of the threaded shank of the competitor's bolt:

<span style="font-weight: bold">Tac Ops bolt handle:</span>
TacOpsBoltHandle8x6-1.jpg


<span style="font-weight: bold">Competitor's bolt handle:</span>
CompetitorsBoltHandle18x6.jpg


<span style="font-weight: bold">Competitor's Bolt (on left) and Tac Ops Bolt (on right):</span>
TacOpsCompetitorsBolts8x6.jpg


Now on the rifles. Getting the angle the same for both guns was tricky, so it may be difficult to see the actual clearance difference in in the photos. However, in person the clearance delta is substantial.

<span style="font-weight: bold">Look at the clearance between the bolt knob's "top" and the stock on this Tac Ops Bolt:</span>
TacOpsBoltKnobClearance26x8-1.jpg


<span style="font-weight: bold">Compared to the clearance between the bolt knob's "top" and the stock on the competitor's bolt:</span>
CompetitorsBoltHandlleClearance6x8.jpg


<span style="font-weight: bold">Also, look at the distance between the bolt knob's "bottom corner" and the grip on the Tac Ops rifle:</span>
TacOpsBoltKnobCloseup6x8.jpg


<span style="font-weight: bold">Compared to the distance between the bolt knob's "bottom corner" and the grip on the competitor's rifle:</span>
CompetitorsBoltKnobClearance6x8.jpg



Keith
 
Re: Anyone not like the AICS chassis? Why?

I like it for durability, and for the most part it's comfortable. However, it's heavy and the length of the grip is a little short. I prefer my Manners stocks....
 
Re: Anyone not like the AICS chassis? Why?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: tman300wm</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I like it for durability, and for the most part it's comfortable. However, it's heavy and the length of the grip is a little short. I prefer my Manners stocks.... </div></div>

You could run, lift weights, and cut off your little fingers...

I like the AI stocks quite a bit and they are my favorite but wouldn't go to any extremes if they didn't work for me.