AR-15 at 1000

Sterling Shooter

Gunny Sergeant
Full Member
Minuteman
Jun 10, 2004
2,842
29
Louisville, Kentucky
Having read the AR-10 thread, it made me think back to a few weeks ago, shooting in a 1000 yard NRA LR tournament at Ft. Knox. As I recall, I was the only shooter participating in Service Rifle division, out of 17 folks who came to shoot. What's up with that? Why no interest in LR with a Service Rifle? I'd think the challenge of winning with a Service Rifle, even if only in the division, would be appealing to any who are seeking to develop their marksmanship skills to an extraordinary level, or to those who'd like to celebrate such skills.
 
Re: AR-15 at 1000

It's a problem, I think the recruiting for things like Service rifle and high power are not very good. Hell when I went to my first F Class match, a large one, I was totally turned off by the Palma people who looked down at anyone not shooting with them. And frankly not only did their ranks show the problem, I think they like keeping it a bit to themselves there was no interest on their part to expand their ranks.

As far as service rifle its hard to say. I agree it could be an excellent training tool for the shooter, but most people don't want to shoot open sights, especially when you consider for the most part, the service is barely shooting open sights anymore. It's probably only the USMC that is still doing that across the board.

People want cool accessories and toys and that's not open sights, as well they want instant gratification which again, is not service rifle. That's hard and takes practice, people want to show up, flop down and shoot a couple of sub moa groups and then go home. They want to buy accuracy out of the box and not put the time in to practice. It sucks, but we see it everyday on here.

I wish my schedule was more open, I would love to try it again like when I was in the USMC, especially I would look forward to the lighter rifle, 15lbs can be daunting at times. My suggestion, put on informal introductions to service rifle, or encourage the governing body to do something along those lines. Because if you don't recruit the sport will die off.
 
Re: AR-15 at 1000

I think your appraisal is accurate; and, indeed, I've been thinkin' about offering a free Service Rifle Clinic, something in the genre of M4/M16 Marksmanship, with an emphasis on the knowledge essential to any/all good shooting. Maybe, a 3 to 4 hour structured classroom event; plus, perspective of aim/grouping exercises. I don't know, I'm thinking aloud.
 
Re: AR-15 at 1000

If we had local Service Rifle Matches here I would be all over it. If I get some extra cash built up I might even look into building a match AR15.

I thoroughly enjoyed shooting the Marine Corps KD course and I really enjoy shooting iron sighted service rifles.

Charles, where do they shoot Service Rifle matches near Louisville?
 
Re: AR-15 at 1000

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LoneWolfUSMC</div><div class="ubbcode-body">If we had local Service Rifle Matches here I would be all over it. If I get some extra cash built up I might even look into building a match AR15.

I thoroughly enjoyed shooting the Marine Corps KD course and I really enjoy shooting iron sighted service rifles.

Charles, where do they shoot Service Rifle matches near Louisville?</div></div>

Borden IN
Ft. Knox
Anderson County, KY
Gnawbone, In
 
Re: AR-15 at 1000

I had the same experience that Lowlight had at my first F-class match. Some of the behavior was bordering on rude from the iron sight shooters. Most of the F-class guys were ok. Didn't let it bother me and have been accepted after a couple years.
I've gotten to know some of the Hi-power/service rifle guys up in Hutchinson and have shot some of their precision matches. Very good group up there!
Even though service rifle is not the most expensive long range sport to get involved in, it isn't cheap. It requires specific mods to the rifle, special ammmo, and yes a good bit of practice to even hit the damn target. For all this work you get to "with one round load" and that is just not appealing to the uninitiated.
The new comer to comps can take their existing rifle, factory ammo, and what ever skill they have and shoot a 3 gun match with some expectation of success. Lots of other new guys to hang with, get to shoot with big name shooters, and for the most part a very friendly atmosphere. Guys will loan a firearm to a fellow competitor if he has one go down.
So in a marketing comparison service rifle suffers from image, special equipment needs, and effort. All the shooting sports are competing for participants so any perceived deterrents with one sport will push competitors into other disciplines. Of all the shooting sports cowboy action kicks all our ass as far as new blood.
None of this is intended as bashing, just my view of the situation.

 
Re: AR-15 at 1000

Skip, for me I gave up on trying to keep an M14 tuned for Palma, and both the short sight radius and the light 80-grain bullets turned me off the Service Rifle for 800-900-1,000.

Hell, I can barely see anymore and need Wayne Forshee's 30mm Right Sight for Palma bolt rifle.
 
Re: AR-15 at 1000

I've dabbled in shooting 1000 yards with the Service Rifle (AR). I dont do near as well as I do with the M1A, but its me not the gun.

I think if I put as much effort in my AR as I did my M1A, I could do a lot better.

We normally shoot three matches a 1000. I try to use the AR in at least one of them.
 
Re: AR-15 at 1000

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: sinister</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Skip, for me I gave up on trying to keep an M14 tuned for Palma, and both the short sight radius and the light 80-grain bullets turned me off the Service Rifle for 800-900-1,000.

Hell, I can barely see anymore and need Wayne Forshee's 30mm Right Sight for Palma bolt rifle.</div></div>

My less than perfect vision, makes some LR venues perhaps too challenging. Mostly, it's about back lit targets in front of earth berms, undersized number boards, and perpetually heavy overcast conditions, which, collectively, preclude me from being particularly confident that, whatever hold I've concluded is best, I'm actually aiming on the correct target. Nevertheless, I'm having a ball with it because, although so ridiculous, it simply is more entertaining than easier shooting competitions. Still, this may be the end of the road for me with the Service Rifle as with what vision is still left, it's now pointing me to considering shooting something with glass in the sight set.

BTW, I know even if you were to lose your vision, you'd still find a way to get the job done. Shooting is in your blood. And, you'd not only find a way, you'd lead the way for others too.
 
Re: AR-15 at 1000

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: kraigWY</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I've dabbled in shooting 1000 yards with the Service Rifle (AR). I dont do near as well as I do with the M1A, but its me not the gun.

I think if I put as much effort in my AR as I did my M1A, I could do a lot better.

We normally shoot three matches a 1000. I try to use the AR in at least one of them.</div></div>

Kraig, what kind of scores are you posting with your AR? In my last match, recently, I posted a 185 and something at Ft. Knox in a light overcast condition, with a 3 to 5 mph prevailing cross wind. I think I can do better if I can put together some sort of program/proceedure to remain conscious of wind changes. I get so wrapped in dressing up my sight picture, I just become oblivious to what the wind is doing. Any advice?
 
Re: AR-15 at 1000

I'd love to try Service Rifle at 1k or even 600y. I truly think that much of the trend in our sport is being pushed by the underlying trend in society for instant gratification.

People go take a MSF riders course and upon getting their paper signed off, they stop at the dealership and buy a 600cc or 1000cc sport bike with an "R" in the name. Then they proceed to rip on it in a straight line after a few miles of "getting used to it" and this keeps my race bike in trim with cheap used parts for stuff like subframes and clip ons.

Had they taken the time to really go learn, they'd spend at least a year doing track days on a Kawi 250 because of the skill required to wring even that bike to it's limits.

This is clearly shown with the group of people I see on the firing lines when I go to the range. Some guy blasting away at a 50y rock with his new 45-70 just wasting ammo to "make something blow up". Meanwhile, he's snickering at me shooting a 22 bolt action rifle. I see him taking 3 rounds to hit 25y clay birds laying on the ground and he's flabergasted when I use the 100y board to clean shotgun shells. Or another guy strutting around the pistol range like Elmer Keith because he has a 44 Mag. He flinched so badly from shooting it though his 7 yard groups were the size of a grapefruit. Maybe the testosterone rush from a massive report and recoil from that pistol does it for him.

The skills aren't worked on, people want to walk up, pay their money and become Joe Q. Sharpshooter. Not to say there isn't a reason to jump in the deep end sometimes, but it's an exception, not a rule.

A close friend of mine has been oogling my 30-06 that my dad and I built since he first shot it. Finally he decided he's going to build one too, bought an action and all the pieces, etc. He decided he's not going to shoot premium bullets, buy good brass or spend the time taking care of the ammo correctly. He's expecting to shoot 147gr FMJ steel jacketed bullets with sub MOA because he's seen my rifle shoot 1/2 MOA with top quality ammo. When he asked about how long it would take to send the rifle out for bluing and I told him my guy takes a couple months he got all disappointed and said "well, maybe I'll just try it myself instead, it's not worth waiting for"... back to instant gratification. He's very new to the idea of shooting anything other than a hand-me-down lever action 30-30 with cheap ammo, so I'm trying to be patient with him. It definitely tries my patience though, especially when he wants to borrow my laser bore sight and then complains when I tell him to replace the set of batteries he used up. "I could have just shot the ammo and saved the money and had more fun."

Right, but you didn't and the batteries cost 24 bucks for the 3 sets you used. Next time buy more ammo or buy more batteries.

He didn't see much point in a rifle/pistol match for 22LR's with 4 strings of fire because it was "only a 22" until he actually tried it and shot about 242/400. Thus far he hasn't broken 300 in the past 3 months and he's starting to get the bug of "chasing minutes" It's hard sometimes and takes a lot of work.

Back on topic and off the soap box... I'd be interested in a Marines style qual match or a long range service rifle match.
 
Re: AR-15 at 1000

Sterling:
I think there are a couple of factors in why you don't see many people shooting service rifle @1000.

First, for civilians the gap between having a competitive rifle at 1000 vs the service teams is greater than the gap for shooting across the course. This is because of the need to either maintain an M-1A at top level performance (much easier said than done). I know I will get flamed for this, but I would say 90% of "match" M-14 based rifles aren't even close to being capable of winning at 1000.

If you go to the M-16 you need to continually tweek loads as the throat moves if you go to VLD's. You can go the easy way and shoot a conventional bullet design, but you are giving up performance. From what I understand the USAMU dealt with this for years and was one reason they pushed for the AR-10 to be allowed.

In talking with Holliger we agreed that the AR-10 does not have much of an advantage over the M-16 at 1000, but will be much easier to keep at the level of accuracy, particularly when trying to load for a bunch of rifles (read USAMU). The AR-10 will be much easier to maintain than the M-14. The move will also put the USAMU a few years up on the USMC, if the switch to the M-16 is an indicator.

FWIW, I have shot the M-16 at 1000 and was pleased with my performance. However, I did it as I did notwant to travel with another rifle (Palma), ammo, etc and not becasue I wanted to compete with the service rifle.
 
Re: AR-15 at 1000

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Sterling Shooter</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I think your appraisal is accurate; and, indeed, I've been thinkin' about offering a free Service Rifle Clinic, something in the genre of M4/M16 Marksmanship, with an emphasis on the knowledge essential to any/all good shooting. Maybe, a 3 to 4 hour structured classroom event; plus, perspective of aim/grouping exercises. I don't know, I'm thinking aloud. </div></div>
O.K. when do you want to start?
I'll take care of the coffee and donuts and theclassroom(yah right)
grin.gif
.
Unfortunately there is nobody I know around here like Yourself(I'm near Augusta Maine).
I would love to take part in something like this and I think its a great chance for people to get together and learn something.

Were I live its mostly backyards,gravel pits and rednecks
smile.gif
 
Re: AR-15 at 1000

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Sterling Shooter</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Having read the AR-10 thread, it made me think back to a few weeks ago, to shooting in a 1000 yard NRA LR tournament at Ft. Knox. As I recall, I was the only shooter participating in Service Rifle division, out of 17 folks who came to shoot. What's up with that? Why no interest in LR with a Service Rifle? I'd think the challenge of winning with a Service Rifle, even if only in the division, would be appealing to any who are seeking to develop their marksmanship skills to an extraordinary level, or to those who'd like to celebrate such skills. </div></div>

I've watched Bob Story do it - crazy guy but a damn good shot - and he has a special load just for it - very fine balancing act, IMHO....:)

Kudo's to those that can tho!
 
Re: AR-15 at 1000

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LoneWolfUSMC</div><div class="ubbcode-body">If you host a "Service Rifle Clinic" in the Louisville area I will make every effort to attend.</div></div>

I'll see about getting something together, could you assist?
 
Re: AR-15 at 1000

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Sterling Shooter</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Having read the AR-10 thread, it made me think back to a few weeks ago, to shooting in a 1000 yard NRA LR tournament at Ft. Knox. As I recall, I was the only shooter participating in Service Rifle division, out of 17 folks who came to shoot. What's up with that? Why no interest in LR with a Service Rifle? I'd think the challenge of winning with a Service Rifle, even if only in the division, would be appealing to any who are seeking to develop their marksmanship skills to an extraordinary level, or to those who'd like to celebrate such skills. </div></div>

The story is incomplete. I see three areas of difficulty.

Availability: The number of 1000 ranges is not increasing, as far as I know but I could be wrong. In my case, I am lucky enough that I live near such a range, near is Texas terms. It's a 100 mile round trip every time I go to a match. Then with travel time, and the match, we are looking at a minimum of 7 hours from the time I get up in darkness to the time I get back home. Practice is out of the question, it takes a lot just to get to the two monthly matches.


Equipment: I am here to tell you that an AR-15 at 1000 yards is not an easy proposition. I shoot one in F-class most every month at that distance and have been for years. You need ammunition for it. Go to the LGS or neighborhood Wally World and pick some right up. Oopps, nobody seems to have much ammo, especially .223 these days. I did see some Black Hills Match ammo for $55 per 50 rounds on-line. It’s 77gr bullets, that should be fine, right? Well no, not really. There are only a few .224 bullets that can make 1000 yards supersonically and while they may be offered loaded somewhere, I have never seen them in store-bought ammo. This is not a problem for me, I handload, been doing it for 30 years. So, I need a heavy VLD bullet with a very potent charge for those 20 inch barrels; something like a 75 Berger or JLK. Thankfully the price of ammunition and components has been coming down for years now, and these are easy to find. Not. But in my case, I have what I need.

You should use the 80gr or heavier bullets, but in a 20 inch barrel, that’s asking a lot and the heavy, over-max charges are not conducive to long barrel life and they do a number on other parts also. I’m sad that I may start an argument here, but the 20inch Service Rifle AR-15 is not something that one can take to the 1000 yard line without a support organization behind you.

My AR-15 sports a heavy 26 inch barrel and I shoot 80gr JLKs out of it. They are solidly supersonic at the target but I have doubts that would be the case in a 20 inch barrel like in an Service Rifle. My chrono showed a difference of 250FPS between my NM AR-15 and my Match AR-15. One can argue all they want about how much to take off a barrel without affecting velocity, you don't know until you chrono. I would have to increase my load for the 20 incher and since I am over max already, that's not something I am terribly interested in doing.

Just buying a regular, run-of-the-mill NM AR-15 is difficult these days, and it may stay like that for a long time to come. And as I said before, you will need to keep it running with very hot loads.


Professional coaching: Training with a coach? What coach? I have time for this? There are coaches for this? I realize that's what you're offering but I'm here and you're not.


Shooting is a perishable skill; if you do not keep it up, you marksmanship suffers. I find that when demands on my time keep me away from the range, my scores suffer. That may be a revelation to some, but I believe that's the way with most people. I do find that I can quickly get back in the groove, I guess it's muscle memory and so on from 40+ years of shooting, but still.

So, I drifted away from Service Rifle and iron sights and got into the F-class camp. I love F-T/R comps, I don't think it's anywhere near the equipment race that F-open is since everyone is limited to .223 or .308 and the weight restriction is real, but I found that I could use my wind reading skills to good effect and since I was already quite knowlegeable with the AR-15 and handloading for it, that was a good transfer of skills, so to speak. And the F-class targets are brutal, especially for a .223 or .308 at 1000 yards. You do not know what an AR-15 can accomplish at 1000 yards until you have taken one to an F-class match.

I do have the hankering to get back to iron sights but that will not be at 1000 yards.
 
Re: AR-15 at 1000

For 1000 yards, I shoot the same match conditioned Service Rifle I use for HP. 24.5 grains of RE-15 gets me about 2740 fps under an 80 grain Berger seated about .010 off the lands. No issues with pressure; and, accuracy is awesome, very low ES and SD. The rifle does not seem to be a problem, but perhaps, for some it could be.
 
Re: AR-15 at 1000

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Sterling Shooter</div><div class="ubbcode-body">For 1000 yards, I shoot the same match conditioned Service Rifle I use for HP. 24.5 grains of RE-15 gets me about 2740 fps under an 80 grain Berger seated about .010 off the lands. No issues with pressure; and, accuracy is awesome, very low ES and SD. The rifle does not seem to be a problem, but perhaps, for some it could be. </div></div>

We can talk accuracy all you want; my scores in F-class 1000 yards are in the very high 180s with this AR15, with an X-count of up to 5 but usually closer to 2 or 3. My records show me that I may catch an 8 once in a while, but I am the king of the 9s. This score translates to a 198-8 or 199-10 on your target. A total score would be something like 594-25 on an LR-1. I think that's decently accurate, don't you?

My LR load is 25.5gr of Varget in a Winchester or Lapua case, with a 7 1/2 primer pushing a molyed 80gr JLK seated .020 in the lands. At 100 feet altitude, the velocity is 2860, 15 feet from the muzzle. I am a half grain over max, and only get about 6 loads out of a case before the primers are too easy to seat for my taste. I use a CWS with the heavy insert and the CS buffer spring from Tubb. I have fired several thousands rounds of 80gr JLK and 80gr SMK with this load but I would not want to do that without the CWS and the CS spring.

I cannot get this velocity in my 20 inch NM rifle, or even your velocity and I have tried RL-15, all the way to 25grs. Best I could get was 2610FPS or so.

I dont know that elevation makes a big difference but it could, I shoot at about 100 feet ASL.

All this to say, that this is an issue for a lot of shooters and will prevent people from attempting this. You must be a handloader, or know someone who will handload for you and it has to be excellent ammunition, tailored to the rifle. And it will be max or above maximum.
 
Re: AR-15 at 1000

"We can talk accuracy all you want; my scores in F-class 1000 yards are in the very high 180s with this AR15, with an X-count of up to 5 but usually closer to 2 or 3. My records show me that I may catch an 8 once in a while, but I am the king of the 9s. This score translates to a 198-8 or 199-10 on your target. A total score would be something like 594-25 on an LR-1. I think that's decently accurate, don't you?"

Decent??? You cannot compare shooting F-TR (off a bi-pod) to shooting out of a sling. Sling up and shoot two or three strings out of a sling on the LR target.
 
Re: AR-15 at 1000

Thank you for missing the point totally.

My point was that F-T/R requires extreme accuracy from a rifle, BECAUSE we are using bipod and scopes and extremely small targets. So, when SS says his rifle is accurate, I was comparing it to the degree of accuracy that is needed to F-class.

In sling shooting, we are talking 2MOA, in F-class we are talking 1MOA, one quarter the size.
 
Re: AR-15 at 1000

Sig, you may have missed my point, getting a rifle that can win is not what I think keeps folks from entering Service Rifle division of NRA LR, in fact, it's perhaps the most economical way to compete in LR. I don't know if my modestly priced rifle is any more or less accurate than any other match conditioned rifle out there; but, since most any rifle will always shoot a bullet in the direction the barrel's pointed, the rifle is only an issue for those who think good shooting is about the gun.

I surmise by the response to my topic, most folks don't have an interest in taking on the challenge of LR with the Service Rifle because they don't have the vision for it, or perceive it's just too hard.
 
Re: AR-15 at 1000

SS, I perfectly understood your point. I actually think it's a great thing that you are trying to do and I applaud you for it.

Your OP was asking why aren't people doing it more. My answer contained 3 areas that I see as obstacles to that. You countered that you could do it with no problems with your rifle, and by the way, ignoring my two other issues.

At that point, I thought if I was going to disagree with you, I had better lay out my bona fides which I did. You are the one who brought up accuracy from an AR-15 at 1000 yards and I countered with an explanation of the level of accuracy I had achieved with essentially the same rifle and exactly the same cartridge. It was not meant as a put down or a oneupmanship gambit, I just wanted you to know that I know EXACTLY what it takes to get an AR-15 to shoot accurately at 1000 yards. (There are not many civilians going around trying to figure out how to keep a bullet above Mach 1.2 at 1000 yards.)

Also, I must disagree with you about a rifle shooting a bullet in the direction the barrel is pointed; past a few hundred yards the bullet becomes a toy for the winds, especially a .224 caliber bullet.


I see that you used the word "vision" as an impediment to SR LR, I am not sure if you chose the term in all its meanings or if you just meant eyesight. I point you back to my first answer about the roadblocks, or rather the speedbumps that are awaiting a civilian who would get into this. I agree that it is the least expensive way to get into LR, but it is also the most difficult in which to get decent results without a total commitment.

If I lived closer AND had the time to devote to it, I would certainly be interested in a few days of training, but as I said earlier, I am here, you are not and my schedule is full as far as I can see.

I wish you luck and hope that you will put on your class and I look forward to reading about it here.
 
Re: AR-15 at 1000

You missed several points. I have a buddy with an out of the box Remington 700 tactical thats shooting high 180's.......... on the F-class target. he's been shooting our Monday evening league since it started in April. I shot two strings Monday (out of a sling)testing ammunition one with a scope 200-15X, Irons 197-9X I don't think my Palma rifle is a two minute gun.

We also have a guy shooting a tricked out AR-15, 26 inch Compass Lake barrel, nice scope, nice bi-pod. He does pretty good if the winds not blowing. We also have a couple of older guys shooting F-open, High Master's one holds a F-open record or two.

Shooting AR-15 service rifle at 1000 yards is tough. Short sight radius and limited velocity/capacity on the case. I believe that if you get a guy started off a bi-pod he probably will never shoot out of a sling much less shoot a service rifle at 1000 yards.

This is Oak Ridge Sportsman Association's Monday 1000 yard leagues 8th year. We have had exactly one guy who started out shooting F-class pick up sling shooting. No one who has ever shot an AR-15 out of a sling has returned. Very little crossover between High Power and Long Range. Its a shame.
 
Re: AR-15 at 1000

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Sig685</div><div class="ubbcode-body">

Also, I must disagree with you about a rifle shooting a bullet in the direction the barrel is pointed; past a few hundred yards the bullet becomes a toy for the winds, especially a .224 caliber bullet.

</div></div>

If you will submit to accepting as fact that the bullet will always go in the direction the barrel is pointed, then, you will also accept as fact, when you don't hit where aiming, you don't know where the rifle is pointed. Once this is part of your mind-set, your shooting will improve dramatically, possibly to the highest level possible for you, since all errors will require analysis, rather than acceptance of misplaced hits. Sincerely, try it out-you have nothing to loose, accept that every bullet can be a pinwheel X.

BTW, I do not own this concept, it came to me from the USAMU; and, trusting the USAMU knows more about good shooting than any other party on the planet, I, long ago, accepted the concept, improving my own good shooting significantly.

Also, adjusting sights to counter the effects of wind is, indeed, knowing where the gun is pointed.
 
Re: AR-15 at 1000

Sig:
Having done ALOT of load testing for the service rifle, I disagree with the velocities you are getting. I can easily get 2750 with 80 grain bullets out of a 20" barrel. This is multiple barrel makers, multiple bullets.
 
Re: AR-15 at 1000

DMS, I understand. Those were the numbers I got from my rifles with my loads. I originally started with the 75gr A-Max and I was loading 26gr Varget and the brass was getting mangled. When It was reported back to me that my bullets were not supersonic at the target out of a 24 inch barrel, I gave up on those bullets.

I started with the JLK 80's some years back and saw a big increase in terminal velocity; the bullets were solidly supersonic and the difference in elevation from the 75 A-max confirmed the higher velocity. I rebarreled and went to a tight 26 inch barrel and was able to drop the charge some, which did not affect the velocity but definitely treated the rifle and especially the brass much better.

At any rate, I believe I have extracted as much accuracy out of the .224 caliber bullet as is available. Where I shoot, it's always windy, it just depends on how much there is and how twitchy the wind can be. The accuracy demands of the F-class target are such that the .224 caliber bullet being a toy in the wind, simply cannot be competitive. It does exceedingly well to 600 yards and I will continue using it for MR, but I am switching over to the .308 for the long range. The rifle is built, the first load has been developed and its first match is next week.

 
Re: AR-15 at 1000

Loading for 1,000 yards for an M16/AR isn't difficult. 24.5 to 25 of Varget behind an 80-grain Sierra (a common and available match bullet) will get you to 1,000 supersonic without popping primers. I choose to use the Tubb CWS to keep my brass from getting beaten up.

The Army Team issues each new shooter an upper for Long Range-only and shoots the brass only once and abandons it (I think they're using VihtaVuori 540 now).

Set your rear sight drum to your 600 yard setting, then dial your front sight down three complete turns (15 minutes). You'll be on paper (perhaps in the black).

You have to stay on the wind much more than with 7.62, but it's do-able. All the youngsters that get to the Army Team shoot Service Rifle (M16) in Palma and 1,000 until they can show the coach they have talent to move up to the bolt rifle (6.5 x 284).
 
Re: AR-15 at 1000

If I'm guessing right, LL and I were both at our first F Class event, and the treatment we received at the hands of <span style="font-style: italic">some</span> of the Palma Shooters was a fair bit more rude than his description would seem to indicate, in at least one instance I personally witnesses deliberately insulting treatment firsthand. I'm grateful I was able to resist reponding in kind. More likely, I was actually shocked speechless.

But there was a genuine dichotomy, and the generous welcome of many of the Palma Shooters, and especially the really proficient ones, more than compensated. I came away with a liking for those shooters, and some appreciation of how varied our fellow competitors can get.

When I wonder where all the Service Rifle shooters went, Charles' and LL's commentary makes a lot of sense, but my own vision keeps straying back to my own M44 Mossberg training rifle. The 'lowly' .22LR bolt gun with the micrometer peep sight was the real initiation many of the pioneers of service rifle comp got on their way to greatness at places like Cherry Ridge, Red Bank, and eventually Camp Perry. Many modern shooters have no inkling of the National Matches in the days before Perry. Being East Coast, I've managed the trek to the first two, even being a shooting memebr at CR for the better part of a decade, but have yet to make it to Perry; and honestly, I don't really need to make that trek to appreciate the enjoyment of service rifle shooting.

I think revisiting the smallbore roots of Highpower National Match/Service Rifle comp is a good way, one of several, to rekindle the interest we seek.

I have some faint hopes that the PalmaV concept I'm thinking about could help support such an effort. I know that for us folks in our area, LR venues are harder and harder to get to, and STP's FV program, while slow to grow, is bringing out new shooters nearly every time, and I think it's realistic to expect that growth to continue.

When the trunk withers, it's time to plant new seedlings. In such ways does the orchard continue to bear healthy fruit.

I think we all have a role, and STP's doing really well in his endeavor, and I'd like to get to the point where I can do something similar.

Greg
 
Re: AR-15 at 1000

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Sig685</div><div class="ubbcode-body">

At any rate, I believe I have extracted as much accuracy out of the .224 caliber bullet as is available. Where I shoot, it's always windy, it just depends on how much there is and how twitchy the wind can be. The accuracy demands of the F-class target are such that the .224 caliber bullet being a toy in the wind, simply cannot be competitive. It does exceedingly well to 600 yards and I will continue using it for MR, but I am switching over to the .308 for the long range. The rifle is built, the first load has been developed and its first match is next week.

</div></div>

"Simply cannot be competitive", why not, after all, you're competing in a division with others using the same equipment; and, you're also competing in a class with others who have similar skill, so is the problem really with the equipment, or could it be with the shooter? Perhaps, your match next week will shed some light on it.

Go into every match, not with a convenient excuse to loose, but rather, with a strategy to win. Remember, only at the highest level of competition will fresh equipment make any difference in the outcome. Skill, confidence and attitude are what propel shooters to success. I know you know this-not trying to dog ya. I think you're in route to becoming a great shooter.

BTW, if, indeed, it's only a bullet separating you from success, why not just take a 6.5/284 to the firing line. No excuses then, right?
 
Re: AR-15 at 1000

Sterling, you are very insightful.

I have asked myself that question many times. And many times, I gave a different answer. It's the caliber. It's the rifle. It's the shooter. It's the caliber/shooter/rifle combo. I've been back and forth on this.

At the mid-range, I have reached Master classification and have shot one match at High-Master level, with the same rifle and the same load. All I need there is time and patience.

But when it gets to the 1000 yard line, I have reached a plateau. I made SharpShooter and can't seem to move up. I call each and every shot, and I get surprised at some of the results. The wind is always a factor at that range. It may very well be me as a shooter who is not detecting the subtleties of the wind and the effect it will have on the bullet.

The targets are so small that any error in wind guaging is enough to blow your bullet into the next lower ring, or two. This is why I keep saying that beyond 600 yards the .224 bullet is a toy for the winds with which they play.

There are not many people shooting an AR-15 in F-T/R at 1000 yards, anywhere I go I am the only one. That is the domain of the 155 and 175 .308 caliber bolt rifle. So, I took a .308 bolt rifle that I had here and put a great big barrel on it. I selected a heavy bullet for it (well two actually, a primary and a backup,) and now I'm going to see if it's me or the rifle. If after a few matches I am at the same level, or worse, I will know exactly where the limitation is, all I will need is a mirror.

Let me add a few thoughts here. I absolutely love shooting in competition. I noticed the opening comments about how the sling shooters look down on the F-classers at certain clubs; this is absolutely not the way where I shoot. We talk and we have a great time discussing things. I suspect it may have to do with the fact I use the same rifle and caliber that they do. Even my .308 will be the same caliber and they have bolt guns also.

The ambiance and camaraderie at a match are great and I have never heard anyone trash or badmouth the "other side." The F-errs have a lot of respect for the slingers to go out with their slings and iron sights and the scores they get; the slingers have respect for the miniature targets the F-errs are dealing with and the scores that can be extracted from them.

To look down on either group shows a lack of understanding and class.
 
Re: AR-15 at 1000

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Sterling Shooter</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> (Snip) I know you know this-not trying to dog ya. I think you're in route to becoming a great shooter.

BTW, if, indeed, it's only a bullet separating you from success, why not just take a 6.5/284 to the firing line. No excuses then, right? </div></div>

I hope to become a great shooter someday rather than just a merely competent one as I am today. However, time is not on my side.

I do not want to take a 6.5/284 to the firing line; I wish to compete only in F-T/R and there it's only .223 and .308. But you knew that already.
 
Re: AR-15 at 1000

I shoot service rifle NRA highpower and have always been greeted warmly by anyone I met. Most of the guys I know that shoot LR also shoot high power, usually at Ft. Gordon. I've had people lone me a rifle to shoot my first match and give me ammo to shoot. They're like drug dealers like that...the first match is free, the rest will cost you dearly. Most of the guys have their loads dialed in and will help you get your bearings when you move out to 600.

There are jackholes everywhere, that is just part of life but the PSMA club members around here are always looking for people to shoot service rifle at Gordon. If you are interested please show up. We only had 9 shooters the last match I went to at Gordon.