• Win a RIX Storm S3 Thermal Imaging Scope!

    To enter, all you need to do is add an image of yourself at the range below!

    Join the contest

AR15 BCG Recommendation

Nice writeup, I tried a fail zero BCG when they first came out and it seized after a couple of FA mag dumps.

Has anyone run the sharps bolt in a short barrel rifle (10.5) ? if so how did it run. I remember they had some breakages due to heat treat a few years back but anyone run one extensively for a while?
 
Nice writeup, I tried a fail zero BCG when they first came out and it seized after a couple of FA mag dumps.

Has anyone run the sharps bolt in a short barrel rifle (10.5) ? if so how did it run. I remember they had some breakages due to heat treat a few years back but anyone run one extensively for a while?

I hate to bash a manufacturer, but lets just say Fail Zero was well represented in the box of shame @ the armorers class.

I'm running the Sharps in a 9" barrel 300 BO & so far so good.

Sharps had issues with their relia bolts a few years ago & it seriously hurt their reputation. They were fully above board disclosing the issue. Sent notices to everyone that had bought one offering free replacement. What they determined to be the problem was improper heat treatment to the S-7 bolts causing lugs to shear. They investigated and completely changed heat treat process and I believe heat treat vendors. My understanding was the original heat treat vendor had basically done a full case harden type heat treat leaving it full hard all the way through, which also makes it brittle. The new 24 hour heat treat cycle produces a surface/case hard result retaining the high strength/elasticity of the S-7 base metal.

All the above was before the release of the XPB DLC BCG's. I new about there prior issues before buying the XPB, but decided to give them a shot since they were forthright in how they handled it and were striving to provide some non gimmicky innovation to the BCG's. I'll admit just the DLC was a huge draw for me due to my past experience with it & Sharps was the only one offering DLC when I bought the first one.

I have never heard of or found a bad review for the XPB's. Highest round count I've seen was about 3000 for one of these so far. The review on Sharps web page is an independant honest one; not a fluff piece and I think it was 1500 rounds without cleaning on mostly overgassed and suppressed platforms.

As stated in my previous post I've got a thousand rounds on the first one without a single failure to feed or fire. I plan to put at least another Thousand through it this year & I'll post if there are any hiccups with it. It cleans up like a dream. I run a few drops of light weight oil on the carrier is all (Benelli MF-82 oil).
 
  • Like
Reactions: call_me_ski
I’m running a sharps bcg in my 12” 6.8spc with a suppressor. I love how easy it is to clean, by far the easiest bolt I have. Only have around 300-400 rounds on it but so far so good.
 
I’ve used bolt carrier groups of all types, low end to high end, mil spec parkerized, dlc, nitride, nickel boron, chrome plated. I now only use quality mil spec phosphate bolt carrier groups. I’ve had the plating flake off of both nickel boron and chrome plated bolts and carriers. I had a young manufacturing national match bcg that wouldn’t headspace well with any barrel. The bolt closed on a nogo gauge in a criterion and a WOA barrel. The nickel boron bcg was from spikes tactical, and the plating started chipping off of the bolt face and carrier rails after only a couple thousand rounds. I’ve had several nitride treated bcg’s and while they’re easier to clean and feel nice and smooth when I charge the rifle, the small parts like the extractor, or the lugs on the bolt are more susceptible to breaking due to the fact that the nitride treatment makes small parts more brittle. I’ve had several nitride extractors fail on the range. Both times the lip on the extractors sheered off, and stopped grabbing the case rims. Both times I quickly replaced them with mil spec phosphate extractors that I had in my bag, and i was back in business. If you want that smooth feeling you get from a nitride bcg I’d recomend using a nitride carrier from a reputable company paired with a mil spec phosphate bolt and extractor. In order to apply coatings like chrome, dlc, or nickel boron, parts must be made under tolerance, to account for the surface coating that will be going on top. I personally don’t trust parts that were made under sized, and depending on a coating that is susceptible to cracking and flaking to bring the part in to spec tolerances, particularly on a bolt face. I want to be able to count on my rifles in any situation for long periods of time before I need to start thinking about replacing extractors, bolts, gas rings, etc. I use mil spec bcm bcg’s because I’ve never had any issue with them and I’ve used them hard. I don’t care if they’re harder to clean, gas gun bolts are not meant to be brought back to “right off the assembly line” white glove clean, they’re meant to be cleaned practically, lubed up, and used. I’d recommend either BCM or toolcraft phosphate bcg to anyone looking to put together a reliable all around use or duty gun. If you’re looking to ring out every last bit of accuracy from a precision f-class or bench rest rifle, then maybe a lantac enhanced bcg might be for you, but most people don’t shoot well enough with gas guns to be able to tell what difference one bcg or another makes in their rifles accuracy.
 
I’ve used bolt carrier groups of all types, low end to high end, mil spec parkerized, dlc, nitride, nickel boron, chrome plated. I now only use quality mil spec phosphate bolt carrier groups. I’ve had the plating flake off of both nickel boron and chrome plated bolts and carriers. I had a young manufacturing national match bcg that wouldn’t headspace well with any barrel. The bolt closed on a nogo gauge in a criterion and a WOA barrel. The nickel boron bcg was from spikes tactical, and the plating started chipping off of the bolt face and carrier rails after only a couple thousand rounds. I’ve had several nitride treated bcg’s and while they’re easier to clean and feel nice and smooth when I charge the rifle, the small parts like the extractor, or the lugs on the bolt are more susceptible to breaking due to the fact that the nitride treatment makes small parts more brittle. I’ve had several nitride extractors fail on the range. Both times the lip on the extractors sheered off, and stopped grabbing the case rims. Both times I quickly replaced them with mil spec phosphate extractors that I had in my bag, and i was back in business. If you want that smooth feeling you get from a nitride bcg I’d recomend using a nitride carrier from a reputable company paired with a mil spec phosphate bolt and extractor. In order to apply coatings like chrome, dlc, or nickel boron, parts must be made under tolerance, to account for the surface coating that will be going on top. I personally don’t trust parts that were made under sized, and depending on a coating that is susceptible to cracking and flaking to bring the part in to spec tolerances, particularly on a bolt face. I want to be able to count on my rifles in any situation for long periods of time before I need to start thinking about replacing extractors, bolts, gas rings, etc. I use mil spec bcm bcg’s because I’ve never had any issue with them and I’ve used them hard. I don’t care if they’re harder to clean, gas gun bolts are not meant to be brought back to “right off the assembly line” white glove clean, they’re meant to be cleaned practically, lubed up, and used. I’d recommend either BCM or toolcraft phosphate bcg to anyone looking to put together a reliable all around use or duty gun. If you’re looking to ring out every last bit of accuracy from a precision f-class or bench rest rifle, then maybe a lantac enhanced bcg might be for you, but most people don’t shoot well enough with gas guns to be able to tell what difference one bcg or another makes in their rifles accuracy.
I have had great success with Anderson MFG RF85 BCG's. No coatings to wear off, but still easy to clean due to lack of lubricant buildup. They work best in an RF85 upper though.