I just figured I'd post this as a little food for thought. I've read a pile of threads the last few years about people asking "what's the best hunting bullet", "best hunting caliber", etc... It seems that people, especially the less experienced hunters are looking for technology to anchor their animals right there.
Now I've done my fair share of hunting just about everything in Canada up to and including moose. I've also seen these critters hunted with everything from a .243 up to a .375 and I gotta tell ya more often than not the animals live long enough to get themselves into some bush somewhere and hole up to die. Don't get me wrong these animals weren't poorly shot they simply refused to die right there. After all we are talking about extremely tough and resilient animals, they didn't survive natural selection by chance.
I remember not too long ago when the majority of big game were taken by 30-30's and .303 brits. The animals travelled just as far, took just as long to die, and almost always ended up in the freezer.
So I guess without getting too long winded what I'm trying to figure out is. In my experience I used to see alot less game lost before all the supermagnums and bonded bullets. Why are there so many now with all this technology? From what I've seen in the bush with other hunters it's my opinion that hunting skills (tracking, patience, etc...) are lacking in a big way. So why is this?
Now before you jump on me for being a hypocrit let me tell you that yes I do shoot some of these supermagnums however I have made every effort not to lose the hunting skills taught to me by my father and uncles.
Fire away I'm curious what the opinions are out there?
-John
Now I've done my fair share of hunting just about everything in Canada up to and including moose. I've also seen these critters hunted with everything from a .243 up to a .375 and I gotta tell ya more often than not the animals live long enough to get themselves into some bush somewhere and hole up to die. Don't get me wrong these animals weren't poorly shot they simply refused to die right there. After all we are talking about extremely tough and resilient animals, they didn't survive natural selection by chance.
I remember not too long ago when the majority of big game were taken by 30-30's and .303 brits. The animals travelled just as far, took just as long to die, and almost always ended up in the freezer.
So I guess without getting too long winded what I'm trying to figure out is. In my experience I used to see alot less game lost before all the supermagnums and bonded bullets. Why are there so many now with all this technology? From what I've seen in the bush with other hunters it's my opinion that hunting skills (tracking, patience, etc...) are lacking in a big way. So why is this?
Now before you jump on me for being a hypocrit let me tell you that yes I do shoot some of these supermagnums however I have made every effort not to lose the hunting skills taught to me by my father and uncles.
Fire away I'm curious what the opinions are out there?
-John