Re: Army M24 Build Thread
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Alaskaman 11</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I think I might of cought some illness from one of these damn marines in here. I'm prior Army, got my tab, well for some sick reason, I am starting to find the M40s more estecticly (sp) pleasing over the M24. Please don't club me to death, but I think they are growing on me. </div></div>
I agree, the McMillan HTG is about as great as it greats aesthetically, the montecarlo style stocks are always great looking hunting stocks. The HS pro series M24 stock is based on one of the heavier Remington 40xb stocks. In Peter Senich's book "One Round War" it shows a 40xb rifle that was considered as a possible replacement for the M40 in the '70s(before Marines choose McMillan stocked M40A1), the stock is pretty much exactly like the M24 stock except for being laminated wood and not have adj buttplate(and being short action of course). B&C also made a sunthectic of it for Remy in the '80s(looked just like the later PSS stock from HS). That 40xb stock, M24 and the similar Winchester 54C target rimfire stock are very good looking stocks as well IMHO. The ergonomics of the HS pro series to me is superior to that of the McBros M40A1 stock. I don't care for the adjustable but plate, but the palm swell and the round forend are really comfortable to shoot-like sitting in a damn lazy boy recliner! The forend really fits the hand like no other stock so there's zero hand fatigue. It sits on a bag or other soft rest just as nicely too.
The HTG is a really strong stock and also does well from a shooting bag, but IMO it doesn't fit the hand or the cross-arm shooting style as good as the fuller HS m24 stock. Both are bad ass looking but HTG/M40A1 has slightly better looks. As for McMillan stocks, I'm torn between the A1/HTG and the A3 as to which is my favorite McMillan. The A4 stock as used by the M40A3-A5 is too baulky.