Atlas 5H or Accu Tac FC-G2

[BoltActionSean]

Hey all.
I’m undecided on which bipod I should get for a DT HTI. I’m looking at the Atlas 5H and the Accu-Tac FC-G2.
please share you opinions on any pros or cons.
Thanks in Advance.

 

[Kasey]

Thanks for considering the Atlas line of bipods for your DT. While you did not include the SCAL it is worth a look - https://www.accu-shot.com/catalog_new/60-super-cal-atlas-bipods there is a post here on SH about them as well - https://www.snipershide.com/shooting/threads/new-b-t-industries-atlas-bipod-blind-pre-order.6976982/ Also worth noting is the fact that the feratures found on the Atlas bipods are non-infringing.

 

[Poorboyr]

I have/had both. I still have the FC G2. I can tell you it’s never had a problem and gets beat up pretty bad. Worked flawlessly on a 50 too.

I’ve switched my Atlas bipods to Accu Tacs. The Accu Tac bipods feel beefier. I prefer the deployment better on the Accu Tacs. Both brands are great bipods. It comes down to user preference.

 

[Steel head]

I have a SCAL and it’s Really good.

 

[ShootnFool8]

Got the 5H a couple of months ago. Don't know why, I didn't get it earlier. Works great for my 338 LM.

 

[Shaun755]

I looooove my fcg2 I won’t go back to atlas

 

[trob_205]

without playing with either and looking at truly taking advantage of the wider footprint id have to say Atlas 5H or the SCAL. The Footprint looks wide on the accutac but the stand off the mount creates between the bipod and the rifle makes the leg angle apex right at or slightly above the barrel . The apex of the leg angles of the 5H and SCAL go clearly above the barrel which should make it more stable (in theory). I also think the Atlas is just a cleaner and refined looking design.

 

[Vallecito1]

Does anyone have experience with the LR-10 G2? I am considering it for my 338 Lapua.