• Contest Ends TOMORROW! Last Chance to Enter to Win a $2k RIX Thermal Scope!

    To enter, all you need to do is subscribe and add a picture of yourself at the range below!

    Join the contest Subscribe

Suppressors B&T SRBS 7.62 Inconel

Rob01

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Full Member
Minuteman
Supporter
  • Jul 9, 2001
    17,637
    14,537
    NC
    Broke down and bought another suppressor and wanted a low back pressure can for my 6mm ARC AR. I was going back and forth between the B&T and the HuxWrx Ventum 7.62. Both were about the same price and got good reviews but the B&T had a free tax stamp so saving $200 won me over lol.


    Took it out for the first time today and I am very happy with my purchase. Shot it on both my 6ARC and my .308 bolt gun. It worked perfectly on the AR. The brass ejected at 4 o’clock to the same place it did without the can on it. The brass was a little dirtier of course but it functioned perfectly.

    Screwed in on the bolt gun and my load that I developed with my brake hit about .4 mils low and .3 mils right but they were just as tight as before. I could feel a slight bit more recoil than the brake but overall not bad. I think I will use it on there for a match on March 1 to try it out. Well below is a pic on my 22” 6 ARC for size comparisons.

    ETA Before anyone mentions it I have a Rifles Only HAD suppressor cover showing up Monday but I couldn’t wait! Lol @Rifles Only makes great products if anyone is looking for a suppressor cover or many other shooting related items. Check them out.



    IMG_4653.jpeg
     
    How does it sound on the bolt gun compared a traditional baffle can? Thinking about getting one. Thanks in advance.

    Honestly from behind the rifle I cannot really hear or feel any difference but these are supposed to be a little louder. The ability to use it on a gas gun is more important to me than a couple of decibels though.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: joetuono
    Thanks. I am looking at this exact can in the SF mount version. Unfortunately, SS doesn't carry it but eurooptic does.

    Yeah the SS version comes with the direct thread which is what I wanted anyways. Being a hub set up I cannot really hear change it if I wanted which is nice.
     
    I have one as well, got it for my SR25, it's just about as quiet as my RC2-762 but it doesn't beat the absolute shit out of the BCG in the Knight's gun which are overgassed as it is.

    Don't really like the SF adapter they came up with. The spring steel locking ratchet is annoying and my mount leaks gas ever so slightly, especially on 556 guns.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: Bluedog82 and Rob01
    I am glad silencer shop only sells the direct thread as it’s easier to move around on my rifles. I know some like the SF adapter but I wouldn’t have kept it.
     
    Glad to see some input on these cans, I just ordered the B&T Print-X RBS 762 TI on a bit of a lark after waiting 3 months for an ordered Cat ODB. If the CAT ever comes in maybe I'll get to compare them head to head.

    As it is, I ordered this can from Capitol armory, and I'm hoping it's the same can as shown on this B&T product page, but honest B&T has so many iterations over the past few years, and the names and details are so convoluted, it's hard to figure out what's what.



    What the Print-x addition means, whether SRBS is the same can as the RBS, whether the SRBS 762 at SilencerShop is the same at the can I bought at Capitol, whether the Print-x Ti 762 has the Inconel blast baffle like the Print-XH 556 Ti, who knows. The weight and length listed on the Capitol page doesn't seem to match the SS page or the B&T page, seems like unnecessary confusion the company would want to clean up.

    Either way glad to read some good reviews on the 762 as well as the positive stuff I've seen on the 556 version. I currently have a gap in my stable for a low back pressure can or two and would like to use this primarily on my SFAR and 6 ARCs, currently use my Nomads on those, but I'm looking forward to seeing what less back pressure will do for them.