Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You needs uh barrel spinner my friend! Thatd take about 2 minutes to clean up.
Speaking of which, do you have any spinners in stock yet? I still need one.You needs uh barrel spinner my friend! Thatd take about 2 minutes to clean up.
As a general rule it's best to do all barrel work prior to cutting tenon and chambering. Anything that can add stress to the barrel and even remotely affect the alignment of chamber to bore.
Blank looks like someone tried to thread the entire barrel![]()
MACHINING DOES NOT INDUCE STRESS. Don't care who says it does, they are wrong. You RELIEVE stress when you machine. When you use a tool that removes a piece of material you are relieving stress. Period.
(re: Iron/Steel)This metal alloy is very strong and resilient, but machining it can introduce undesired stresses into the physical structure of a part. Stress relieving steel is one way to deal with this situation, and machined steel parts may warp or crack during use if this type of action is not taken. This process can relieve over 90% the internal stress within steel, and is particularly useful for large cast or welded parts, in addition to workpieces from which a lot of material was removed during machining.
I assume that among your other skills you have a post graduate degree in metallurgy?
What you say is about "90% correct". When forging/casting operations are performed the metal is usually normalized (held at 50 C over the metal's upper critical temperature for 1-1/12 hours per 25mm of thickness and then air cooled). Yes, this is done on rifle barrel steel prior to it's being drilled and reamed. Sometimes even after these operations for some premium blanks.
Where you and the metallurgists depart is that while a small amount of machining will not add stress, removing large amounts of metal CAN and does. An example of this in rifle barrel manufacture is the contouring pocess were as much as 50% of the barrel blank can be removed by turning. Metal is being pulled by the tool until it reaches it's elastic limit and then separates from the other crystalline structure of the surrounding metal. The slower the material is removed, and with proper lube/coolant, the less stress is returned to that normalized blank.
Here's an excerpt from a paper written by a metallurgist:
This is probably the #1 reason that not all rifle barrels perform well as they warm up and those barrels that have the least amount of material removed from the blank do best (ie: Bench Rest Barrels in "Heavy" or "unlimited" class). They do better because as they warm the stresses don't affect the bore axis, not just because they're stiffer.
FWIW, I used to work in an R&D shop where we made ultra precision parts for military projects. Tolerances were so close that after every machining operation most parts were sent off for "normalizing" in the Heat Treat Shop. The last operations performed were precision grinds on mating surfaces using pre-warmed parts and heated coolant/lube and removing so little material in a pass that it might take a day or two to finish the part. All to prevent stress from returning to the workpiece.
I assume that among your other skills you have a post graduate degree in metallurgy?
What you say is about "90% correct". When forging/casting operations are performed the metal is usually normalized (held at 50 C over the metal's upper critical temperature for 1-1/12 hours per 25mm of thickness and then air cooled). Yes, this is done on rifle barrel steel prior to it's being drilled and reamed. Sometimes even after these operations for some premium blanks.
Where you and the metallurgists depart is that while a small amount of machining will not add stress, removing large amounts of metal CAN and does. An example of this in rifle barrel manufacture is the contouring pocess were as much as 50% of the barrel blank can be removed by turning. Metal is being pulled by the tool until it reaches it's elastic limit and then separates from the other crystalline structure of the surrounding metal. The slower the material is removed, and with proper lube/coolant, the less stress is returned to that normalized blank.
Here's an excerpt from a paper written by a metallurgist:
This is probably the #1 reason that not all rifle barrels perform well as they warm up and those barrels that have the least amount of material removed from the blank do best (ie: Bench Rest Barrels in "Heavy" or "unlimited" class). They do better because as they warm the stresses don't affect the bore axis, not just because they're stiffer.
FWIW, I used to work in an R&D shop where we made ultra precision parts for military projects. Tolerances were so close that after every machining operation most parts were sent off for "normalizing" in the Heat Treat Shop. The last operations performed were precision grinds on mating surfaces using pre-warmed parts and heated coolant/lube and removing so little material in a pass that it might take a day or two to finish the part. All to prevent stress from returning to the workpiece.
Noted and I appreciate the correction. As it pertains to this post/thread: Is anything I stated going to ruin this guys project? The inclusions he's shown in photos look to be around .02" in depth at the most. Would you consider this invasive or heavy?
C.
Damn good information. However at what point in precision gunsmithing does this get into diminishing returns. I have no doubt that you are absolutely correct, but how much is truly applicable to the subject at hand? I know that the goal it the most precise machining possible but...
Deadshot2, I hear what you are saying about the sliding scale and I agree. I guess I was referring to taking so much care in not inducing "stress back into the steel" that an operation would take a day or two to complete.