Hi all,
I posted this conversation in the reloading section, but I think gun smiths might have a different opinion.
I have a 300 win mag. I purchased some go and no go gauges from PTG and some cheap PPU ammunition for break in. I did a comparison of the 3 head-spaces of the brass, the go, and the no go gauge. Notably, Head space for the belted magnum is from the bolt face to the bore end side of the belt. It is not the shoulder for belted magnums. This is somewhat a new concept for me as I have just gotten familiar reloading the 308 Winchester which is based off of the shoulder. Anyways, went to do a visual inspection of their belt heights. For comparison with the eye, I took computer printer paper and shimmed the brass to the go gauge and the go gauge to the no go gauge and checked their level.
Interestingly, I have a hard time telling the difference between the head space gauges. By the test, the difference is 1 slice of paper. Now the prvi brass took three slices to get to the go gauge and therefore 4 to get to the no go gauge.
1) Is it typical to have really similar set of gauges yet somewhat far off brass? I mean if min and max is within a sheet of paper and the brass is 3-4 papers off, wouldn't that be somewhat harmful to the boltface/ overwork the base of the brass? Is is possible that the brass or the gauges are out of spec?
2) Since the rifle is a bolt action, and the head space is not based off of the shoulder, I think that fire-forming/ just neck sizing the brass will allow me to have a custom fitting shoulder to the chamber. Theoretically less cold working the brass for longer life, and potentially more accuracy. Moreover, redundancy with "headspace" as the belt and the neck would keep the brass from moving around. Is that typical of belted magnums or do people still like to full length die them?
I posted this conversation in the reloading section, but I think gun smiths might have a different opinion.
I have a 300 win mag. I purchased some go and no go gauges from PTG and some cheap PPU ammunition for break in. I did a comparison of the 3 head-spaces of the brass, the go, and the no go gauge. Notably, Head space for the belted magnum is from the bolt face to the bore end side of the belt. It is not the shoulder for belted magnums. This is somewhat a new concept for me as I have just gotten familiar reloading the 308 Winchester which is based off of the shoulder. Anyways, went to do a visual inspection of their belt heights. For comparison with the eye, I took computer printer paper and shimmed the brass to the go gauge and the go gauge to the no go gauge and checked their level.
Interestingly, I have a hard time telling the difference between the head space gauges. By the test, the difference is 1 slice of paper. Now the prvi brass took three slices to get to the go gauge and therefore 4 to get to the no go gauge.
1) Is it typical to have really similar set of gauges yet somewhat far off brass? I mean if min and max is within a sheet of paper and the brass is 3-4 papers off, wouldn't that be somewhat harmful to the boltface/ overwork the base of the brass? Is is possible that the brass or the gauges are out of spec?
2) Since the rifle is a bolt action, and the head space is not based off of the shoulder, I think that fire-forming/ just neck sizing the brass will allow me to have a custom fitting shoulder to the chamber. Theoretically less cold working the brass for longer life, and potentially more accuracy. Moreover, redundancy with "headspace" as the belt and the neck would keep the brass from moving around. Is that typical of belted magnums or do people still like to full length die them?