Re: Best Beginner Caliber.
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: George63</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: steve123</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Smiley72437</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I plan on hunting deer and elk. I do reload. </div></div>
I am going to have to agree with Glock24 and Tikka in 6.5x55.
Lapua 6.5x55 brass is top quality and quite a deal compared to their other offerings. 123-140 grain bullets have a high BC and can be driven fast while creating only moderate recoil. The barrel life will be good as well.
My friends box stock T3 in 6.5x55 keeps up with my $2500 custom rifle in 6x47L. </div></div>
can you give a rundown of cost to shoot 4000-10,000 rounds of 6.5 x 55
rifle, loading cost, rebarreling etc </div></div>
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: George63</div><div class="ubbcode-body">for volume centerfire nothing is less expensive to load/shoot than .223, it will do fine for learning even with 55gr to 600, if it is legal for deer and the right bullets are used it will work, the real cost of shooting is the ammo not the rifle/optics etc by the time you run 4000 rds of 223 you will have saved enough on ammo over 308 (the next best deal) to get another decent rifle/scope setup. </div></div>
I didn't recall the OP wanting a cost comparison. You seem to be coming from a priority of cheapest cost perspective combined with the perspective that volume of fire in practice is more essential than quality of practice for a beginner??? Maybe I'm misunderstanding you? I look at the subject quite differently.
I'm all for saving money but not at the cost of being unhappy over the long term with a rifle,scope,cartridge combo. The term by once cry once comes to mind. Within ones financial limits of course. I'm sure there would be at least a couple grand extra burning a hole in my pocket had I not tried to avert the saying. Not having to buy and sell guns in a cartridge you might not be happy with in a few month,years saves money.
I should bring up a few points about "overall cost" by the numbers vs "value per dollar" and "end result satisfaction". Along with different scenarios, comparisons and perspectives so you know why I made the suggestion I did.
Also staying within the context of the OP's desire to shoot long range and hunt big game with a reasonable energy level at distance.
Well right off the bat 223 is out of the running. Can you hunt and kill big game with 223? Yes. Is it advisable especially considering there are a multitude of better choices? NO...I also believe in practicing with the same gun you compete or hunt with. After a while you develop a sense of where to aim in different wind conditions. Shooting different cartridges and guns dulls the intuition some. So why practice with 223 if you are primarily hunting/competing with,for instance 6.5x55?
I noticed you mention in your post previously you were comparing the cost for 308 and 223 brass military brass acquired for nearly free. My first example would be comparing mixed lot, military, assorted headstamp 308 brass with new Lapua 6.5x55 brass of the same lot number. Not really a apples to apples comparison. Of course from a purely financial bias the 308 brass wins. From a accuracy, consistency and brass life perspective the Lapua 6.5x55 brass is hands down the best value. If you want to compare new Lapua 308 brass and new Lapua 6.5x55 then it's apples to apples as they are the same price and quality.
My next point would be ballistics.
Lets take a common modern load for 6.5x55 with 140's to compare to a common 308 load with 168's.
6.5x55
Litz G7 BC and the standard environmental on the JBM site.
Velocity of 2850fps.
Drop at 600Y is 73.2", drift for a 10mph wind is 17.6",energy left is 1405 ftlbs.
308
Litz G7 BC and the standard environmental on the JBM site.
Velocity of 2600fps.
Drop at 600Y is 97.1, drift for a 10mph wind is 26.3 and energy left is 1156 ftlbs.
Maybe it's just me but If I were a novice shooter attempting to make my first long range kill on a deer with any kind of wind involved I'd sure rather a have a 6.5x55 in this scenario ???
Or how about using a 308 at a long range event that allows other cartridges? Rarely is it that someone shooting a 308 wins the event. To me there's lots of value in better ballistics over actual dollar amount.
Concerning practice. Which type of practice brings the better result with the end result being the ability make a first round hit? Practice by going out and shooting larger quantities of ammo or quality practice by attempting to make 1st round hits on a target whether alive or not at distance? Or how productive will a practice session be?
It's just my opinion but I'll use my practice sessions as a example. I used to go out and shoot 100-200 rounds at time about 3 times a month. I learned some things practicing that way but not as much I've learned since I changed my practice regimen. I've been going out 2-3 times a week for a short period of time using 15-20 rounds and practice at one or two distances,positions or shooting scenarios. I found this to be far superior "and cheaper" to blowing off a bunch of ammo at one time and I've also become a much more versatile rifleman in the process having had my share of wins this year. So here again. There's value in efficient practice.
So here we are. Is a 223 or 308 cheaper to shoot? Yes. Is it necessarily the best value? Everyone has got to decide that for themselves.