Re: Bighorn Action or Surgeon Action?!?
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Terry Cross</div><div class="ubbcode-body">No.
The rumors are not justified.
Main reason is that all of the "problems" were caused by things other than the action.
You can hang a complicated target trigger on any action and quadruple the risk of the rifle going down in a dirty field enviromnent. It has been done many times and there is plenty of video of the guys struggling with the rifle because of it.
You can put a minimum headspace match type chamber on any action and quadruple the risk of the rifle going down in a dirty field environment. It has been done many times and there is plenty of video of the guys struggling with the rifle because of it.
You can load and try to shoot ammunition that is prepared with benchrest techniques (neck size only, tight neck, no shoulder bump, etc. . . . ) and quaduple the risk of the rifle going down in a dirty field environment. It has been done many times and there is plenty of video of the guys struggling with the rifle because of it.
You can fit a barreled action into a new whiz bang stock so poorly that the DBM doesn't work right and jack with perfectly good magazines in an attempt to correct the fucked up fitting to the point that the rifle does not feed correctly under most field conditions. It has been done many times and there is plenty of video of the guys struggling with the rifle because of it.
I could go on and on for a while. . . . . . .You can only imagine the outcome if you were to combine two or more of the above into one rifle setup.
The bottom line is you can build a rifle with the best action out there and still sabotage the complete package by making poor choices on the specs that follow after your action choice.
I have seen this exact thing happen with many actions including AI AW and AI AE.
My opinion only.
Be safe,
Terry
</div></div>
Why I read when you post....Thanks Terry.
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Terry Cross</div><div class="ubbcode-body">No.
The rumors are not justified.
Main reason is that all of the "problems" were caused by things other than the action.
You can hang a complicated target trigger on any action and quadruple the risk of the rifle going down in a dirty field enviromnent. It has been done many times and there is plenty of video of the guys struggling with the rifle because of it.
You can put a minimum headspace match type chamber on any action and quadruple the risk of the rifle going down in a dirty field environment. It has been done many times and there is plenty of video of the guys struggling with the rifle because of it.
You can load and try to shoot ammunition that is prepared with benchrest techniques (neck size only, tight neck, no shoulder bump, etc. . . . ) and quaduple the risk of the rifle going down in a dirty field environment. It has been done many times and there is plenty of video of the guys struggling with the rifle because of it.
You can fit a barreled action into a new whiz bang stock so poorly that the DBM doesn't work right and jack with perfectly good magazines in an attempt to correct the fucked up fitting to the point that the rifle does not feed correctly under most field conditions. It has been done many times and there is plenty of video of the guys struggling with the rifle because of it.
I could go on and on for a while. . . . . . .You can only imagine the outcome if you were to combine two or more of the above into one rifle setup.
The bottom line is you can build a rifle with the best action out there and still sabotage the complete package by making poor choices on the specs that follow after your action choice.
I have seen this exact thing happen with many actions including AI AW and AI AE.
My opinion only.
Be safe,
Terry
</div></div>
Why I read when you post....Thanks Terry.