Re: Bourne Legacy
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Blackops_2</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: 2ndPanzer</div><div class="ubbcode-body">A Bourne Movie without Jason Bourne in it? Its like porn with no chicks... you know, GAY. </div></div>
I disagree, Matt Damon didn't do it for me in the first bourne movie. I've seen parts of them and stopped watching cause I just had no interest. Matt Damon's good, but Jeremy Renner is better. Hell the class of actors in this movie is much better, Jeremy Renner, Edward Nortan, and Rachel Weisz. That tops Matt Damon, Clive Owen, and Brian Cox IMO.
I never saw why the originals got such high ratings maybe i need to re-watch one or something. </div></div>
Not talking about Damon, I'm not a big Damon fan, but rather, the character of Jason Bourne not being in a movie about the character, Jason Bourne. I am a fan of the character and his story. Who plays who or what, IDGAF. Its like a Batman Movie thats about Robin and only talks about Batman but never shows him and is named for him. They should have called it "treadstone" or something related to the original series plot, not continued on with a character's name and then not show or have it be about the character. A whole 'nother series could have been made with different actors and that would be fine. Probably could delve deeper in the background and have some cool stuff in there since it takes focus away from one main characters story. This is going the way of Star Trek, and the Next Generation... 10 years from now instead of Kirk or Picard, it will be Bourne or This guy...
NOTE: Not a Trekkie, but for the record, Kirk because he would and did tap any and every POA he encountered, plus Shatners version of "Rocket Man" is one of the funniest things I have ever seen.