That's one interpretation. Another is that they were clearly having electrical problems, and it would appear propulsion problems. You infer that it was "contrived", and by extension, "intentional". Where's the motive? Why would a Singapore-flagged container ship with an Indian crew hosting a local Baltimore maritime guide ... intentionally want to take out this bridge? I mean ... I love a good conspiracy theory, but there's no motive to this one. The made up motives are WAY harder to believe than simple mechanical and judgement failures at the worst possible time.I've watched the video.. Say what you want.. ships going straight, changes course to bridge support, lights out, lights come back on, and ship adjust course to bridge beam, lights out, right before it hits, lights come back on, so they can 'pretend' to try to avoid bridge, make emergency calls, drop anchor.. and all the rest of the 'we tried'.