@Bryan, are you still drunk?

[The D]

I wasn’t in that thread, but…

from the sounds of it yet another dummy who can’t stand people not agreeing with him, now he thinks he’s special because he’s being made fun of. Don’t worry he’s over there LOLing, because the jokes on us…we are all just ”triggered”.

also, I guess he was replying to himself with insults to his own posts in the first thread.

Oh, another one of these “academics”. Gotcha

 

[kenny1773]

No, I just know a retard when I see one.
View attachment 8323467

There are consequences, I am calling Marcel now

 

[Tokay444]

Yes it was. I had a great time f-n with y’all. Having it now too esp after yall made a post in my name only. Thanks

No it isn’t.

 

[Sniper King 2020]

Y’all have taught me that I get more from a prize in a Cracker Jack box than loggin in to the hide (sorry younger gen if you don’t get this one). Also, you inspire me to watch the walking dead so I can get some strategy on how to deal with undead hoards I see there is a newer version where Negan and Maggie creep into Manhattan…zombies be dropping from 20 stories high kinda like the hide! thanks and hope your 2024 is going well. Call me soon

 

[myronman3]

Unfortunately, it was very, very basic stats information. He decided to elevate it to something seemingly much more complicated. Even went so far as to cite his post graduate education and imply that he was in possession of advanced knowledge which no one else was capable of understanding.

And then refused to articulate his position when asked directly. Instead deciding to insult people. Vaguely and veiled at first, but very direct once he was continually pressed to articulate his opinion.


I think it's fairly important for shooters to have a basic understanding of how things like standard deviation work (most really don't know much about it at all). So, those threads were doing a decent job shedding some light on this for people.

sounds like basic liberal SOP.


mental health worker you say? idk about the rest of you....but every SINGLE one of those people i have dealt with should not be allowed outside the asylum.....they are the craziest of the crazy. batshit level.

every.
single.
one.

 

[Downtown]

Who is this guy? Why does he keep saying "triggered"? Is he another one of those silly YouTube "influencers"?

 

[Tokay444]

sounds like basic liberal SOP.


mental health worker you say? idk about the rest of you....but every SINGLE one of those people i have dealt with should not be allowed outside the asylum.....they are the craziest of the crazy. batshit level.

every.
single.
one.

This one plays with guns.

 

[myronman3]

i did not witness the previous shitshow.

but in a brief look at his posts here, and his profile picture.....here is what i have surmised.

he's that guy that shows up to a small club shoot (the kind guys put together to have a fun range day and maybe raise a buck or three for the club) and acts like he is trying out for delta. and that he works in the "mental health" field.......yeaaaaaaaaah. one of these guys.

think flip with a slightly bit more ability to cover it up.

 

[rtB]

Reminder for the day:

You can't drink all day if you don't start first thing in the morning.

 

[Rio Precision Gunworks]

i did not witness the previous shitshow.

but in a brief look at his posts here, and his profile picture.....here is what i have surmised.

he's that guy that shows up to a small club shoot (the kind guys put together to have a fun range day and maybe raise a buck or three for the club) and acts like he is trying out for delta. and that he works in the "mental health" field.......yeaaaaaaaaah. one of these guys.

think flip with a slightly bit more ability to cover it up.

To be fair, he's a very accomplished BR shooter. I believe shooter of the year 2022.

Apparently he just doesn't respond well to anyone questioning anything at all. Which is pretty entertaining since he likes to appear that he's a scientist (social or otherwise) and researcher. Questioning things and being questioned is pretty much the heart of those professions.


Anyone actually interested in helping/teaching the community would have no problem articulating their opinion.

 

[Long Range 338]

If someone claims to be here to disseminate new information (even if it is just your POV), why resort to the name calling and insults? Then afterwards pretending to take the moral high road and then somehow become the victim of bullying?

If your data is good, let it prove itself out. As if there were a lack of people on the hide that are very highly educated and technically trained. Pretending a degree in Psychology is somehow going to make you a wizard in math or statistics is not only foolish but stupid.

Once the facade of intellectual superiority wasn't able to be maintained (in his own mind of course) the anger came out and by morning the thread is deleted to removed the actual evidence of the meltdown.

 

[hkguns]

I was in at the beginning and quickly noticed his assumptions were questioned by some serious people who deserved to be listened to...........

But, he's a fellow shooter, we are all a minority and hated by roughly 45% of this country.

He can't be all bad, (even though he's clearly pumping his YT channel.) Sounds like there may be some Zanax involved later on in that thread from the sound of things.

The name change may also be the result of the Zanax script.

 

[Tokay444]

Playing with his full name and having pictures of himself with his daughter on line, and then conducting himself in such a manner are quite concerning.

 

[akmike47]

little late for a name change moron we know everything, your youtube is your name.

 

[JB.IC]

His argument was that in order for it to be properly considered a 'sample' the numbers had to be randomly selected across the entire population; since they were taken sequentially one after another he felt that disqualified the use as a 'sample' for inferential statistics. WTF he didn't just come out and say that... I dunno.

It doesn’t disqualify them as a sample for inferential statistics. Sequential sampling is literally a sampling method. Also, the ANOVA method he uses all the time, guess what? It treats the data as samples regardless if he calls them a populations. If you have population data, you don’t need ANOVA to compare means.

Also, all of the components that go into building a round are random in nature when you use them. The powder is dispensed randomly, the bullet is seated randomly, the primer compound and material is random, etc. The population is the components you have or intend to use. You only care about the components you have because you’ll be using the components you have. Brass for example, 200 pieces of brass for me are going to outlast my barrel. If for whatever reason you have to buy new brass while a barrel still has life, then the population might change and you’ll need to do more testing to see if the population changes. But, I’m not really concerned about the other million possible pieces of brass I will never used. If the population changes because you got a new batch or lot, then retest to see if the previous sample’s population is different from the new sample’s population.

If you want to call three shots group a population, then those three rounds used have to be exactly the same every time you use one of those three rounds for any future shooting. The moment you use a similar but different complement like a primer, case, bullet, etc., the population has changed.

Furthermore, since reloading and firing a round is more of a process, the samples that are more closely related is call a rational subgroup of the population. You are comparing a rational subgroup to other rational subgroups. If they are statistically the same, then nothing in the process changed. If they are not statistically the same, then something in the process changed (different batch, lot, etc.). Using inferential statistics is fine.

 

[Tokay444]

I think he killed himself.

 

[hlee]

I think he killed himself.

They don’t think forum suicide be like it is, but it do…