Advanced Marksmanship BUILDING 264 OR A GRENDAL ??

[YOTE223]

ANY INPUT ON WHICH WAY ONE SHOULD GO ON THIS I KNOW THEY ARE BASE THE SAME THING ALSO IF I GO 264 IS LES BAER THE WAY TO GO OR ??????

 

[shankster..]

Re: BUILDING 264 OR A GRENDAL ??

Forget about the Les...


Go for the Max:

It better.

 

[YOTE223]

Re: BUILDING 264 OR A GRENDAL ??

ok what is max ????

 

[Kaisersose]

Re: BUILDING 264 OR A GRENDAL ??

I thought they were the same caliber, just no royalties paid on the Les baer, because AA having trademarked the name "Grendal"

 

[Rthur]

Re: BUILDING 264 OR A GRENDAL ??

Jethro Bodine= Max Baer, you should google him.
BTW Shank that is some funny shat!
Rthur

 

[eleaf]

Re: BUILDING 264 OR A GRENDAL ??

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Kaisersose</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I thought they were the same caliber, just no royalties paid on the Les baer, because AA having trademarked the name "Grendal" </div></div>

An Alexander Arms Grendel has a compound angle throat allowing it to shoot virtually any projectile very accurately.

The Les Baer has a standard throat.

I have an AA Grendel and I really dig it. It took a bit of work to find the sweet spot in my dies, but one I have, everything fits like a glove.

I was shooting steel at 700 yards the first time I used it, as well as the first time I ever shot at anything even approaching that range.

 

[Greg Langelius *]

Re: BUILDING 264 OR A GRENDAL ??

The one great freedom you have left is the one of free choice.

To Hell with what others think, make your own choices.

If they are good choices, that will soon become apparent, and likewise otherwise.

You probably won't learn much from others' experiences, they have different imperatives than you do.

Just be careful you don't step off any obvious precipices.

Greg