Again what extra parts NEED to be packed in over the conx? You have to use a phone to true data with the conx.. With the conx you have to have a kestrel to get actual data correct? . Not so with the 2400. In fact in the field you don't NEED anything but the rangefinder itself to get accurate ballistics with the 2400 if you have any ability to guess wind. A kestrel only gives you the wind hold at your location and atmospherics.. The kilo knows your atmospherics.. calculates spin drift and corialis. You only NEED the rangefinder.. I'm really lost at how you discount the kilo when the conx needs everything your complaining about with the kilo? Not trying to be disrespectful I just don't understand your logic. The kilos ability to range 3000 yards might not be a big deal to you but it makes it that much better at 1000 yards. The conx is inferior in every way to the kilo.. other than it has a tripod mount lol.
In order to set up the 2400, you need 1) the sig 2) the wind attachment 3) a smart phone and if needed the tripod mount, =3 or 4 Items
with the ConX you need 1) the ConX 2) the Kestrel., =2 Items. and if you are shooting under 800 yards then you only need One.
Like I said this this thread is about the ConX Vs the 2200, and as such the ConX is better.