How many of you are using this stock? and how do you feel about it? My brother is planning on purchasing one to put on his mini SASS, I have never seen one up close and am curious as to its quality and function. Please post pics if you have any.
-
Having trouble using the site?
Contact support
CAA SRS Buttstock
- Thread starter coldboremiracle
- Start date
Re: CAA SRS Buttstock
here is a thread that i started that has a pic of my ar with that stock
http://www.snipershide.com/forum/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=2249449#Post2249449
i like it, but it is somewhat cheaply made, the mono pod works great though and that part is very sturdy. if i hadnt bought that stock i would have deffinately gone with the magpul sniper stock.
here is a thread that i started that has a pic of my ar with that stock
http://www.snipershide.com/forum/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=2249449#Post2249449
i like it, but it is somewhat cheaply made, the mono pod works great though and that part is very sturdy. if i hadnt bought that stock i would have deffinately gone with the magpul sniper stock.
Re: CAA SRS Buttstock
Ok, so you say it seems cheaply made, thats definately a con. Is there anything else you would change about it? And what is it about the magpul you like better?
Ok, so you say it seems cheaply made, thats definately a con. Is there anything else you would change about it? And what is it about the magpul you like better?
Re: CAA SRS Buttstock
what parts do you consider cheaply made? They only reason it SEEMS like that is because it has lots of moving/adjustable parts. Some other people have said that it has a lot of play or slop but that's just goofy. Mine is rock solid, when the movable parts are tightened down like they are suppose to be, NOTHING wiggles AT ALL.
The Magpul PRS is less prone to snagging on stuff, but it is far LESS adjustable. 1" LOP adjustment vs. 3.5" with the SRS.
Unless you have a very high scope height, the cheek weld likely won't even be used. The monopod itself is worth it in my book. Its superior to the Accushot monopod people use for the PRS, and it's built in.
The ONLY thing I will/would ever say negative about it is that the monopod snags like hell on my ghillie, but the benifits of having it available far outweigh that one little "con"
what parts do you consider cheaply made? They only reason it SEEMS like that is because it has lots of moving/adjustable parts. Some other people have said that it has a lot of play or slop but that's just goofy. Mine is rock solid, when the movable parts are tightened down like they are suppose to be, NOTHING wiggles AT ALL.
The Magpul PRS is less prone to snagging on stuff, but it is far LESS adjustable. 1" LOP adjustment vs. 3.5" with the SRS.
Unless you have a very high scope height, the cheek weld likely won't even be used. The monopod itself is worth it in my book. Its superior to the Accushot monopod people use for the PRS, and it's built in.
The ONLY thing I will/would ever say negative about it is that the monopod snags like hell on my ghillie, but the benifits of having it available far outweigh that one little "con"
Re: CAA SRS Buttstock
Anytime, and thank you.
That can was a dealer stand in. Mine is a YHM Phantom QD in matching Desert Sage cerakote. Looking to put a few touch ups on the cerakote in the next week, perhaps a skull/snake pattern in a desert multicam paint scheme.
Anytime, and thank you.
That can was a dealer stand in. Mine is a YHM Phantom QD in matching Desert Sage cerakote. Looking to put a few touch ups on the cerakote in the next week, perhaps a skull/snake pattern in a desert multicam paint scheme.
