Oakland officials are going after a 102-year-old wheelchair-bound man
A 102-year-old wheelchair-bound man was threatened with a hefty fine from Oakland officials after thugs graffitied his home and he was unable to remove the paint.
-
Having trouble using the site?
Contact support
Calf logic on display again
- Thread starter Gunfighter14e2
- Start date
Here is an idea. This is a virtual pile of shit by the city. Shame the city. Better yet, get a lawyer and sue the people personally responsible for this citation. Sue them into bankruptcy. Yes, it can be done. If people can steal money from Trump because he looks orange, they can certainly get money from people that clearly need to learn a lesson.
Who’s gonna enforce it ?
That’s right the blue line parasites
#backtheblue
That’s right the blue line parasites
#backtheblue
The article notes a utility box down the street is covered with graffiti, and nobody does anything about it, because it is owned by the city.
Find out who wrote the citation
Hire a bunch of the "untouchable" illegal immigrants to go give them a "tune up"...
I'm confused, who is the 102yr old guy supposed to sue into bankruptcy?
The little bitches who are attracted to the power of muni government will inevitably push the wrong guy too far. It happens more than you think.
en.wikipedia.org
Kirkwood City Council shooting - Wikipedia
If I was told to go cite or arrest this old man by a superior, I would tell them to go fuck themselves.
Yea but that would require one to use the never uttered by a democrat word....
ethics.
Get some guys and go paint it for the old fella. On city time, then tell the head negro to go fuck himself if he don't like it. With all the crime going on in that shithole ,they are worried about this?
While many times, there's a lot of other things going on that people don't consider. And I'll attempt to defend the reasons behind them.
But this aint one of them. Anyone citing someone like this in a city with these other problems needs at minimum substantial retraining and disciplinary action. I'd probably also argue that something like this should be a fireable offense.
At the very minimum, someone from the local .gov should just go out there and paint it for the man rather than even consider a citation.
But this aint one of them. Anyone citing someone like this in a city with these other problems needs at minimum substantial retraining and disciplinary action. I'd probably also argue that something like this should be a fireable offense.
At the very minimum, someone from the local .gov should just go out there and paint it for the man rather than even consider a citation.
They should but they won't.
As for the give up all hope because you can't fight city hall and just take it up the keister, that is not an acceptable solution.
"tar and feathers" needs to be a fashionable passtime again.
roofing tar, of course!
roofing tar, of course!
Sue them for writing a citation? What am I missing here? Like personally suing a law enforcement officer, for emotional distress, over writing a citation for speeding?
I have had this story told to me many times, I have never seen it as we have never had TV in our jail here.
In the places that have TV I am told they really don't care what is on TV just as long as it is something. If someone comes in and starts to have issues, you turn off the TV. Watching game shows all day may not be much, but it is something to pass the time, and the people inside that have now lost that TV tend to get cranky. Not at us but at the guy that got the TV turned off. It usually corrects itself fairly quickly and usually with just words. Once and a while you will get someone that thinks he is all that and a bag of chips, and that usually does not go well for him....but most of the time, like 98% it is just don't get our TV turned off again and your stay here will be much more easy.
I wonder if you grabbed a handful of people that are known to paint up things like this, gave them a brush and a bucket and said you are not going to go home till this is clean. A little Sheriff Arpaio type deal. I have a feeling things would calm right down.
But that is not the way it works anymore, the entire game is setup up to punish you for doing the right thing your entire life, and reward those that do not. They want to destroy it, there is no other explanition for it.
In the places that have TV I am told they really don't care what is on TV just as long as it is something. If someone comes in and starts to have issues, you turn off the TV. Watching game shows all day may not be much, but it is something to pass the time, and the people inside that have now lost that TV tend to get cranky. Not at us but at the guy that got the TV turned off. It usually corrects itself fairly quickly and usually with just words. Once and a while you will get someone that thinks he is all that and a bag of chips, and that usually does not go well for him....but most of the time, like 98% it is just don't get our TV turned off again and your stay here will be much more easy.
I wonder if you grabbed a handful of people that are known to paint up things like this, gave them a brush and a bucket and said you are not going to go home till this is clean. A little Sheriff Arpaio type deal. I have a feeling things would calm right down.
But that is not the way it works anymore, the entire game is setup up to punish you for doing the right thing your entire life, and reward those that do not. They want to destroy it, there is no other explanition for it.
I'm betting the DummiecRats will fill out his voting card from his grave for eternity until a massive meteor hits the earth into oblivion.
Go back to the constitution. Would solve everything
Right now we have a criminal organized crime oligarchy
.
If restoring our Constitution and putting Government back into it's chains isn't your goal you are on the other team.
The worst sort of people are the ones who say, "Congress doesn't get anything done." Yea, it was set up that way. Why do you think the radical Left calls themselves "Progressive"? Progressing towards total control is what that means. Our government is supposed to be very slow and deliberate, and we see what happens and how stupid they are when they're not.
We're not going to stop criminals from committing crimes and marking all over your property (that's called "vandalism" in a civilized society), but we are going to attack you for not cleaning it up as fast as we want. If you don't see what they did here, you're part of the problem.
I can't think of a better example of "progressive" policies that even a brain-dead leftist can understand, not that it will change their programed thinking, but at least it will demonstrate to the non-indoctrinated how stupid their ideas are.
The worst sort of people are the ones who say, "Congress doesn't get anything done." Yea, it was set up that way. Why do you think the radical Left calls themselves "Progressive"? Progressing towards total control is what that means. Our government is supposed to be very slow and deliberate, and we see what happens and how stupid they are when they're not.
We're not going to stop criminals from committing crimes and marking all over your property (that's called "vandalism" in a civilized society), but we are going to attack you for not cleaning it up as fast as we want. If you don't see what they did here, you're part of the problem.
I can't think of a better example of "progressive" policies that even a brain-dead leftist can understand, not that it will change their programed thinking, but at least it will demonstrate to the non-indoctrinated how stupid their ideas are.
There was this case recently not far from me, where the "heroes" of the local militarized police destroyed some woman's fence and part of her house while trying to "get somebody quicker".
Then the Uniform hangers promptly came along and wrote her a fine for having a broken fence...
And some folks wonder why lots of folks think just letting it all burn to the ground and starting over from scratch might not be a better idea.
So far as I can tell, that is a non-answer. The Constitution sets courts and gives Congress and the President to create and pass laws, levy taxes. What things not enumerated by the Constitution are in the bailey-wick of each member state. Nothing specifically speaks out against fines for unkempt conditions.
The only thing that comes close is possibly what you mean, since you refuse with the power of a religious faith to directly answer the question, is the 2A. Defense against tyranny. Well, then, why is the tyranny not being resisted? Why is there not an uprising in the modern day Sodom and Gomorrah?
We wouldn’t have 99’percsnt of the federal
Government if we stuck to the constitution.
Women and non property owners wouldn’t be voting. That also would pretty much solve things by itself
Freeloaders vote for more free stuff.
And
Women vote for husbands, not leaders. They vote for the person that can do the most for them financially, which to them translates to security. That eventually boils down to socialism.
Let women keep the right to vote if you’d like. Nothing you or I do or say will change that. But you will eventually lose your country to tyranny.
Look at what’s happening with immigration. That’s cat lady logic on a national scale. Fit as many cats as you can in the mobile home, even at the detriment of any other cats that are already living there. Any and all cats get a place to sleep. This works ok till you are stuffing dead cats in the freezer, and the entire house stinks like piss.
Similar threads
