It's different for sure. I've been contemplating how this barrel could work for over two years now, finally gave into my curiosity and bought one.
Your post has piqued my interest as well... from what I can tell, the barrel uses a "normal" gas block ? ( Which begs to ask the question... would an angled gas block help more ? )
I can't help but wonder how much the angled gas port helps felt recoil v. a gas port size "tuned" for "mild" cyclic operation.
That comment is not intended to imply angled gas ports don't work / help felt recoil and allow for less pressure dwell time.
I have always felt gas port size's could be better optimized, or at the very least more carefully chosen for a specific barrel length and gas system length being used.... and the intended use of the AR. And most certainly, I think that in context to Large Frame AR's.
If, I had the time and money, I'd love to do a "Filthy 14" abuse test with a barrel just like this ( Last total round count was 67,500 ? and no cleaning )
I am super curious how "sluggish" it could get and still run.
Years ago..... when dirt cheap surplus 5.56 roamed the Earth...
I tried a Colt 20" HBAR barreled RLGS with as heavy rifle length buffer weight possible , with a Tubbs CWS 4.2oz setup added to the BCG, and a Tubbs 5.56 Flatwire recoil spring... I couldn't get it to choke on any brass cased ammo, even PMC Bronze 55gr. ( Never been a fan of steel cased 223 ) And granted I didn't try it in cold temps... but I was surprised the heavy weighted reciprocating mass just kept on running.
I realize my comment is an "Apples to Oranges" thing to your tested barrel and firearm setup, but it does show, between your setup and mine, how versatile the AR platform can be.
I might have to buy a 14.8 Siphon AGP and abuse it mercilessly.
Again Thanks for sharing.