Bryan Litz suggests using a large rifle primer (rather than a large magnum primer) to touch off 65+ grains of slow ball powder?
I don't think so.
I've been wrong before though, so show me the error of my ways.
BryanLitz
Sergeant
Follows
3
Following
0
Join Date
Aug 2008
Location
Michigan
Posts
533
Feedback Score
0
H1000 and H4831SC are both good temperature stable choices for the 230's in 300 WM.
You'll get about +100 fps with MAGPRO, but that's a double base and hence more temperature dependent powder.
With MAGPRO you can push the 230's 2800 fps+ out of a 24" barrel. That's loaded to 3.600" COAL, which is max mag length for the XM2010 magazine.
The COAL is a very important variable when loading this bullet in 300 WM; you want to load them as long as your throat and mag will allow to get the long bullet out of the case as much as possible.
Another tip; use standard large rifle primers for this, not magnum primers. I've consistently seen larger groups and higher MV SD's with mag primers.
The 230 Tac Hybrid is the one with the shorter nose and lower BC, intended to be more accommodating for mag feeding. We've seen equal precision from the full-blown Target Hybrid (un-constrained nose length, higher BC) at 3.600" COAL. So many people, including myself, are questioning the fate of the 230 Tac Hybrid if the higher BC 230 is just as good in the length constrained application.
Here are the 300 WM and 300 WM vs. 338 LM reports referred to above:
http://www.appliedballisticsllc.com/...agWEZ_Rev1.pdf
http://www.appliedballisticsllc.com/300_338_Rev1.pdf
This analysis also appears as chapters 13 and 14 in "Accuracy and Precision for Long Range Shooting" (Accuracy & Precision Book) along with many other WEZ analysis.
Be careful about the conclusions of the 300 WM/338 LM comparison. It shows that the 300 WM with the modern, optimized 230 grain bullet can outperform .338 with 250 and 300 grain legacy bullets. However, if you look at the 338 LM also with modern, optimized 250 and 300 grain Hybrid bullets, then the 338 is still on top.
It is an eye opener though, comparing the 300 WM with it's legacy bullets vs the new 230's. Lots of performance there.
Take care,
-Bryan
Last edited by BryanLitz; 03-29-2013 at 08:51 AM.
Bryan Litz
Ballistician
Author of: Applied Ballistics for Long Range Shooting and Accuracy and Precision for Long Range Shooting