Re: China General: We Can't Challenge U.S. Military
still dont trust em as far as I could toss 30 of the little bastards...
still dont trust em as far as I could toss 30 of the little bastards...
-
Having trouble using the site?
Contact support
China General: We Can't Challenge U.S. Military
- Thread starter KillShot
- Start date
Re: China General: We Can't Challenge U.S. Military
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: shootist2004</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Phil1</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Mustafa</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: shootist2004</div><div class="ubbcode-body">We have a treaty with Taiwan that says we will protect them from China....</div></div>
No we don't. </div></div>
The Taiwan Relations Act (TRA; Pub.L. 96-8, 93 Stat. 14, enacted April 10, 1979; H.R. 2479) is an act of the United States Congress passed in 1979
"The act stipulates that the United States will "consider any effort to determine the future of Taiwan by other than peaceful means, including by boycotts or embargoes, a threat to the peace and security of the Western Pacific area and of grave concern to the United States".
This act also requires the United States "to provide Taiwan with arms of a defensive character", and "to maintain the capacity of the United States to resist any resort to force or other forms of coercion that would jeopardize the security, or the social or economic system, of the people on Taiwan." Successive U.S. administrations have sold arms to the ROC in compliance with the Taiwan Relations Act despite demands from the PRC that the U.S. following legally non-binding Three Joint Communiques and the U.S. government's proclaimed One-China policy (which differs from the PRC's One-China Policy). The Taiwan Relations Act does not require the U.S. to intervene militarily if the PRC attacks or invades Taiwan, and the U.S. has adopted a policy of "strategic ambiguity" in which the U.S. neither confirms nor denies that it would intervene in such a scenario."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taiwan_Relations_Act </div></div>
Phil1.....Thanks for watchin' my 6</div></div>
Read it again. We maintain "strategic ambiguity" that says we MIGHT protect Taiwan...but maybe we won't. We are not by any means OBLIGATED by the treaty to defend Taiwan from China though. This allows us to deal commercialy with China, keeps China from straight up invading anytime they want, and it keeps Taiwan from declaring indepenence and screwing up the status quo.
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: shootist2004</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Phil1</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Mustafa</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: shootist2004</div><div class="ubbcode-body">We have a treaty with Taiwan that says we will protect them from China....</div></div>
No we don't. </div></div>
The Taiwan Relations Act (TRA; Pub.L. 96-8, 93 Stat. 14, enacted April 10, 1979; H.R. 2479) is an act of the United States Congress passed in 1979
"The act stipulates that the United States will "consider any effort to determine the future of Taiwan by other than peaceful means, including by boycotts or embargoes, a threat to the peace and security of the Western Pacific area and of grave concern to the United States".
This act also requires the United States "to provide Taiwan with arms of a defensive character", and "to maintain the capacity of the United States to resist any resort to force or other forms of coercion that would jeopardize the security, or the social or economic system, of the people on Taiwan." Successive U.S. administrations have sold arms to the ROC in compliance with the Taiwan Relations Act despite demands from the PRC that the U.S. following legally non-binding Three Joint Communiques and the U.S. government's proclaimed One-China policy (which differs from the PRC's One-China Policy). The Taiwan Relations Act does not require the U.S. to intervene militarily if the PRC attacks or invades Taiwan, and the U.S. has adopted a policy of "strategic ambiguity" in which the U.S. neither confirms nor denies that it would intervene in such a scenario."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taiwan_Relations_Act </div></div>
Phil1.....Thanks for watchin' my 6</div></div>
Read it again. We maintain "strategic ambiguity" that says we MIGHT protect Taiwan...but maybe we won't. We are not by any means OBLIGATED by the treaty to defend Taiwan from China though. This allows us to deal commercialy with China, keeps China from straight up invading anytime they want, and it keeps Taiwan from declaring indepenence and screwing up the status quo.
Re: China General: We Can't Challenge U.S. Military
Don't use racial slurs, next time you'll be banned for 30 days minimum.
Don't use racial slurs, next time you'll be banned for 30 days minimum.
Re: China General: We Can't Challenge U.S. Military
It wasn't a "racial slur" by definition, but an abbreviation of nationality.
It wasn't a "racial slur" by definition, but an abbreviation of nationality.
G
Guest
Guest
Re: China General: We Can't Challenge U.S. Military
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: G.Ruff</div><div class="ubbcode-body">It wasn't a "racial slur" by definition, but an abbreviation of nationality. </div></div>
Gene, call it like you see it, fuck these pussy's.
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: G.Ruff</div><div class="ubbcode-body">It wasn't a "racial slur" by definition, but an abbreviation of nationality. </div></div>
Gene, call it like you see it, fuck these pussy's.
Re: China General: We Can't Challenge U.S. Military
Well I guess somethings don't slide haha. Oh well thought there was thicker skin around here.
Well I guess somethings don't slide haha. Oh well thought there was thicker skin around here.
Re: China General: We Can't Challenge U.S. Military
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Skyclad Shinobi</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Well I guess somethings don't slide haha. Oh well thought there was thicker skin around here.</div></div>
Thick skin has nothing to do with racial slurs. Racist remarks, slurs, etc have a zero tolerance policy here.
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Skyclad Shinobi</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Well I guess somethings don't slide haha. Oh well thought there was thicker skin around here.</div></div>
Thick skin has nothing to do with racial slurs. Racist remarks, slurs, etc have a zero tolerance policy here.
Re: China General: We Can't Challenge U.S. Military
quit worryin about china and arm yers elves fer e.t./anunakim.
quit worryin about china and arm yers elves fer e.t./anunakim.
Re: China General: We Can't Challenge U.S. Military
I'll be sure keep it clean for ya'll then. Even if its something I'm not accustomed to. Rule are rules
I'll be sure keep it clean for ya'll then. Even if its something I'm not accustomed to. Rule are rules
Similar threads
