• Win a RIX Storm S3 Thermal Imaging Scope!

    To enter, all you need to do is add an image of yourself at the range below!

    Join the contest

Range Report Chronograph Testing

ARx3

Private
Minuteman
Jul 6, 2019
54
241
69
Kansas
I was able to get out Friday for a quick chronograph test on my wife's 6.5 PRC. Factory Hornady 147 ELD-M out on her 24" Krieger barrel Averaged 2869.5 fps with an ES of 23.6 fps and SD of 9.9 fps. A little slower than the 2910 fps on the box. The weather was great,I only wish that I had had more time to test more loads.
Chrongraph Testing 6.5 PRC (2).jpg
 
What is the general consensus here on the number of rounds in a string and the number of strings that should be shot in order determine a particular load's potential ?
 
Statistically, at least 30. That is not always practical. There is an advertised error rate for your chronograph so that is a factor as well though not very material. Most run with 10 shots to reach an 80% confidence. Then we true up down range.
 
Example, if your chronograph is accurate to 1% than your results with just those five shots are close to that margin of error. 2870/2910
 
Thanks for the information. I'm new to the precision rifle game but have been use to chronographing pistol loads to determine power factor and accuracy. I do usually shoot 10 round multiple strings to confirm my pistol ammo that I use in competition . I have the Shooter App on my phone and have found it really useful. I probably won't ever compete in any long range precision events but I like the idea of being able to compare my loads to factory ammo. I also like to find the best load I can for our rifles fully realizing that I'm the weak link behind the trigger. I have been handloading since 1978 and my chronograph is a older Pact Professional Model that I have had for years.