Another interesting ruling.I'm glad you asked...
In a court case known as "Chevron Deference" back in 1984, the SCOTUS ruled that the government agency has the right to interpret and adjudicate it's own rulings for it's own regulations it writes. So, the judiciary branch ruled that the executive branch can make, interpret, and hold hearings about it's own rules instead of taking shit to the courts to determine if lawful or not.
So much for separation of powers.....
View attachment 7195117
Separation of powers has been gone for quite some time, there is another interesting court case that I still would love to see some 2nd amendment foundation take up, but none of them seem interested.
" A State may not impose a charge for the enjoyment of a right granted by the Federal Constitution. P. 319 U. S. 113."
It may not be enough to in the federal background check system, however any state that requires a permit or a license that you have to pay for in order to purchase, or carry a firearm is void.
Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105 (1943)
Murdock v. Pennsylvania: It is unconstitutional for a state to tax people selling religious merchandise.
supreme.justia.com