The flu had already killed 81k by the end of Febfuary. Just saying.
-
Having trouble using the site?
Contact support
Corona virus is a ploy by the globalists to destroy small businesses, seize absolute control of the economy, and institute totalitarianism.
- Thread starter heronblue7
- Start date
The flu had already killed 81k by the end of Febfuary. Just saying.
Number of deaths for leading causes of death:
- Heart disease: 647,457
- Cancer: 599,108
- Accidents (unintentional injuries): 169,936
- Chronic lower respiratory diseases: 160,201
- Stroke (cerebrovascular diseases): 146,383
- Alzheimer’s disease: 121,404
- Diabetes: 83,564
- Influenza and Pneumonia: 55,672
- Nephritis, nephrotic syndrome and nephrosis: 50,633
- Intentional self-harm (suicide): 47,173
And another thing.
"Well let's see how you feel when you are begging to be put on a ventilator."
I just told my wife today. In case that bad bitch of a virus I had back in January wasn't Covid, if I ever test positive dont you let them put me on a ventilator.
In case some of you haven't learned this yet, being put on a ventilator has been a death sentence for most Covid patients. If your lungs aren't exchanging O2 because the virus is chemically binding O2 transfer, having a machine breathing for you won't help.
Demand the use of the drugs that have been around for 70 years, that HAVE been effective at treating the disease.
"Well let's see how you feel when you are begging to be put on a ventilator."
I just told my wife today. In case that bad bitch of a virus I had back in January wasn't Covid, if I ever test positive dont you let them put me on a ventilator.
In case some of you haven't learned this yet, being put on a ventilator has been a death sentence for most Covid patients. If your lungs aren't exchanging O2 because the virus is chemically binding O2 transfer, having a machine breathing for you won't help.
Demand the use of the drugs that have been around for 70 years, that HAVE been effective at treating the disease.
The CDC gives a range of 24,000 to 62,000.
It's clear that the most contagious thing this year is stat cherry-picking. Millions of cases confirmed just in the past few weeks.
Maybe it will be around. Maybe not. Maybe people will eat better and get off there ass and they would be much healthier and more likely as in almost sure to survive this. Personal choices cause most health problems. Not all.
Some flue seasons are much worse then others the best flu season in the last ten years 2011-2012 only had 12,000 deaths, and the worst 2017-2018 had 61,000 deaths.
Yep. It's apparently not a reportable cause of death in all areas, and testing isn't exactly widespread.
Total estimated number of flu infections is just a SWAG.
A somewhat educated SWAG, but still a SWAG.
And I don't know anyone who knows anyone who has contracted this virus. So what?
Last edited:
As much as I loathe (insert name of almost any politician or MMM celebrity) I do not fault them or their parents for their putrefied existence but rather the fools who lap up every molecule of fecal matter that plops from their oral sphincter.
Their status would not be possible were it not for people who cannot help themselves from typing out threads like this. Likening an insidious microbe to Frau Pelosi or Herr Anderson Cooper is not only humorously appropriate it may also be necessary to properly put into context the value of their contributions to humanity. But not being able to disambiguate a virus from its use as a political tool is absolutely necessary to the demagogues existence. And they thank you for it.
The unfortunate visual metaphor for his laziness are those jiggling bitch tits. He reminds me of the worst sports commentator faggot who has spent his entire life sitting on the sidelines, being too much of a pussy to jump into the game, assessing the skills of actual participants, criticizing those he deems to have executed plays with insufficient heart, and now that he's all grown up he sits in front of a giant phallus of a microphone that he leans into with the vigor of someone who understands nothing more about the field of play other than the jock size of someone he desperately wishes blow.
For him, it will always be "them" or "they" because he can't bring himself to stand upright and join the ranks of men and women who actually do something. The beneficiary of his rambling ignorance is that slice of humanity who have shelved themselves from the field of reality while seeking shelter to relieve fatigued senses. How insipid.
This sort of ordinary laziness will always be less interesting (to me) than the paranoid and toothless meth-head who peers beyond the shades and sees that his enemies have hung live human heads in the tress of his yard. The heads mumble amongst themselves as they spy upon him and report back to the police who work to assert their control over his life. With glassware in one hand and a Bic lighter in the other he raises both to his cracked lips and after a deep inhale he is shielded from the forces of doom.
The guy in the video or the meth head... while equally detached and without value, if I have to endure listening to one or the other the choice is easy.
And then herd immunity will kick in just like all the other diseases that have come and gone.
Comment has no bearing on the discussion. According to WebMD there are more than 200 viruses that cause the common cold.
Pretty funny...are you familiar with the concept of an ad hominem fallacy? Cause that's what you just did...
I got an idea, instead of attacking him for the way he looks, how about you read one of his books (The Trigger is eye opening) and your elusive "THEY" will become apparent.
Yup, I am more than a little bit familiar with it. Same goes for Mr. Icke.
He is a mindless conspiracy theorist and holocaust denier and has announced himself as THE son of God. The most accurate and comprehensive summation of "The Trigger", by a critic whose assessment I agree with, was WORD VOMIT.
If you knew anything at all about Mr Icke (as a sports caster and footballer) you would know that my comments are directed at very specific things he has done and said. Very specific. Where in the world do you think my sportscaster, field of play, and crystal meth comments came from??? There is more than one double entendre in there and maybe even a triple. You cannot have missed them unless you have had ZERO introduction to him.
There is no chance you have read his works if the references are not obvious. Unless you missed the words.
Having said all of that, if you continue to maintain that you have some knowledge of this rambling shitbag (which, based on your position of ignorance is utterly indefensible) then it follows that you are likewise not remotely familiar with the concept of ad hominem fallacy.
So, you can disagree and I will just post up a gazillion references (with links) to parse out every single word I said and inference I made. And I will get all deconstructiony and what-not.
If you knew anything about my posts over the last nine years you would know that nothing I go on about is random and nothing is without reference.
That leaves me with the suggestion, dear Sir, that you prove me wrong.
Last edited:
Prove you wrong about what? That you're incapable of coherent thought or debate? Who gives a shit if Icke was a shitty sportscaster...that'd be like saying you suck at shooting because you were abused as a child. And before you draft up some long-winded, hyper aggressive response, let me just say I'm done responding to you....this thread isn't about Icke
So you're saying my comments were not random, were in fact a keen assessment of Icke's own failing words (written and spoken) and actions, and your quip was a colossal error in judgement?
Maybe you are swimming around the right word choice to characterize what I wrote? Masterful spoof, sublime parody, and deft satire could be a few you are chewing on? None of them are exactly correct, but it would put you in the neighborhood.
I am here to help.
Last edited:
I can agree with you there, it most certainly was not.
Watch out though, I might be an alien trying to trick you. I do look damn good in red...
noted...I'll be sure to avoid the fag in the corner suckin some redmans sausage. Thanks for the heads up
- Promotional image from a YouTube video by David Icke
You introduced Icke to this thread, not me.
Icke is entirely appropriate to the conversation for many reasons, not the least of which is that his endless drivel is laden with conspiratorial anthropomorphism not unlike the title of this thread.
For those who don't know, Icke rose to notoriety for his theory that that an alien race of shape-shifting reptile people control the planet. The topic is garden variety conspiracy ejecta. But Icke enriches the topic with droning interpretations of Gnostic texts such as the Nag Hammadi, and meth induced cryptographical analysis of biblical Apocrypha like the Dead Sea Scrolls. Icke says these texts contain strong evidence that certain interdimensional reptilian higher vibrational beings of frequency, known as Archons, appear on Earth as humans (Illuminati), masking their true reptilian form.
I have to pause for a breath after re-reading that last sentence.
This barely scratches the surface. Icke rambles on about these lizard people for 517 pages in his tome, The Biggest Secret. One thing conspiracists love is rambling. The more endless the rambling the greater the credence given to it. Following this success he gives us The Trigger, which rambles on for 900 pages. That is to say, it contains 383 more units of credibility that the aforementioned work. Moreover, all of these words are given to us courtesy of God. The Trigger is the basis for his video that I poked fun at. Actually, I poked fun at a lot more than the video.
This is the foundation upon which the counter position of @fistedcuck stands, or more likely, kneels.
I like to think that Icke wakes up from a night of heavy drinking and is incredulous at the stinking shit he wrote down the night before, and doubly so at the zeal with which people have lapped it up. I like to think this because it allows me room to suspect that he is a clever person with a sense of humor. But of course I am disappointed. Terribly so.
Last edited:
You stay up all night writing that one? Look, I don't agree with every thing Icke says. I simply stated that he made an interesting point about how covid19 was being redesignated. Then you jumped in and went off on an tangent....and you're still fucking going. Unbelievable.
Like I mentioned before, your posts are riddled with ad hominem because that's all your little reptilian brain is capable of, I get that. How about you focus and argue the original topic - "Corona virus is a ploy by the globalists to destroy small businesses, seize absolute control of the economy, and institute totalitarianism."
Here, I'll make it easy for you. Since your so obsessed with Icke and can't focus without writing a novel, how about you listen to a 21 year respiratory therapist saying THE SAME SHIT
Now, why don't you take those obsessive investigating skills of yours and try to figure out if covid is bullshit or not...
Like I mentioned before, your posts are riddled with ad hominem because that's all your little reptilian brain is capable of, I get that. How about you focus and argue the original topic - "Corona virus is a ploy by the globalists to destroy small businesses, seize absolute control of the economy, and institute totalitarianism."
Here, I'll make it easy for you. Since your so obsessed with Icke and can't focus without writing a novel, how about you listen to a 21 year respiratory therapist saying THE SAME SHIT
Now, why don't you take those obsessive investigating skills of yours and try to figure out if covid is bullshit or not...
Mmmmm, it was maybe 15 minutes of typing it out. I went back for a few spelling and grammar fixes. Basically, 1.5 cups of coffee. As a contributing editor to a few publications this is a very casual and brief effort. I do far more than this, with some real effort and thought, many times a day, every day.
"Corona virus is a ploy by the globalists to destroy small businesses, seize absolute control of the economy, and institute totalitarianism."
That statement (which I took a casual swipe at more than once), making claims about my knowledge of and utility with argument forms without forming an argument of your own, thinking that any of this anything BUT easy for me... come on dude!
I'm bored and practically begging for something to sink my teeth into, but this 3rd party cast of characters is not entirely fair to them and doesn't do much more than eclipse what YOUR positions are. Supporting references can provide some excellent bolsters, but relying entirely upon proxies is faggy and tackling them is not very satisfying. I'm shooing flies here and feel like I'm missing out on the fun of the real you.
How about instead of throwing out an Icke video, or the testimony of some 21 year old respiratory therapist, or simply calling me the ad-hominemator, how about YOU perform a rebuttal, instead of leaning on someone else's position how about YOU take a stand on something, instead of throwing up videos of others why don't YOU put up your own?! Give me something to work with for fucks sake. Take any angle you like - rely on clever arguments, use humor, an appeal to conscience, maybe some scientific discourse... whatever you choose I promise to work with it.
Last edited:
Ah that explains the tangents. Yes, I'm sure your editorial skills are second only to my two-year old nephew.
It's actually quite easy DUDE. You see the title is something called "the conclusion" Now in a rational debate, which again you obviously are not capable of, normally someone would take the position of proving it wrong with premises. Being a third rate editor I completely expect you to do this with fallacious arguments, which again you already have and continue to do. Come on dude!
Try taking your dentures out.
He's actually a twenty one year VETERAN. Captain Ad hominem strikes again
I just did you moron.
Why don't you switch to tea and go back to editing elders digest. You're the one not providing any substance or foundation to formulate a rational debate.
Last edited:
