Give me your advice on the perks between the 2.
My buddy has a CZ that has been jazzed up with a Ligia barrel, manners stock, dip trigger etc. All in all it probably cost up words of 1200-1300. Great trigger. We were shooting 1/2" 5 shot groups with Lapua match at 100 yards.
Sako has great reviews and already has most of my "wants" built into it. However, I read the trigger is crap and the stock is not super comfortable.
Should I just go with the CZ 455, buy it in .17 HMR and get the aftermarket barrel in .22? The cz seems to have more modularity.
Am I getting bad info on the sako?
My buddy has a CZ that has been jazzed up with a Ligia barrel, manners stock, dip trigger etc. All in all it probably cost up words of 1200-1300. Great trigger. We were shooting 1/2" 5 shot groups with Lapua match at 100 yards.
Sako has great reviews and already has most of my "wants" built into it. However, I read the trigger is crap and the stock is not super comfortable.
Should I just go with the CZ 455, buy it in .17 HMR and get the aftermarket barrel in .22? The cz seems to have more modularity.
Am I getting bad info on the sako?