Rifle Scopes Dear Nightforce,

Re: Dear Nightforce,

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: redneckbmxer24</div><div class="ubbcode-body">

Do you know how little difference parallax adjustment makes? I've shot many scopes with no parallax adjustment from 50-1000 yards and it made no difference inside about 700-800 yards. I highly doubt your going to be shooting at a game animal with a sporter weight rifle at the distance it would make a difference. The 2.5-10X32 is a great scope for close to long range, if it needed a parallax knob NF would have added one. The scope was designed and tested by people who HAVE to make their shots count and they obviously didn't think they were missing out on anything. It's definitely over engineered for somebody just knocking down deer. </div></div>

I've had quite a shift with some in the 300-400 range.

And a sporter weight barrel doesn't negate long-range shots. An accurate rifle is an accurate rifle. I hunt out to about 600 or so. A rifle only needs to be capable of 1.25 MOA to make such a shot on most big game. My .280 AI shoots well below .5 MOA. I'd still prefer something in a 3.5-15, 3-12x or whatever. I have been considering a 2.5-10x32, but I haven't committed to it because it isn't what I want. If it suits you, that's all good and well. If not, well, its my money.
 
Re: Dear Nightforce,

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: redneckbmxer24</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: cjgemm</div><div class="ubbcode-body">

A 3-12x42 ffp based off the compact line would be NOTHING like the F1 or just about anything offered by any manufacture. Some companies do listen though, and I'm for one hoping that this is on there list. </div></div>

Since you seem to know so much about the workings of optics why don't you go ahead and design one for them? Its not as simple as waiving a wand and making a smaller version. It would take quite a bit to make that scope and the 2.5-10X32 does basically anything you could ask in a compact scope so I don't see them even thinking about making this. The 3.5-15 isn't exactly a hubble telescope, it's a pretty compact scope for what it is.

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: tylerw02</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The thing is, myself and several other guys would be buying a FFP 3-12x or 3.5-15x NF...or even if it wasn't FFP if they would make it in a smaller, lighter package. The 2.5-10x lacks parallax correction while the F1 is too damn heavy for a sporter-weight hunting rifle. I'm int he market for a hunting scope with illumination after my Zeiss Conquest had an issue. I want something tougher. </div></div>

Do you know how little difference parallax adjustment makes? I've shot many scopes with no parallax adjustment from 50-1000 yards and it made no difference inside about 700-800 yards. I highly doubt your going to be shooting at a game animal with a sporter weight rifle at the distance it would make a difference. The 2.5-10X32 is a great scope for close to long range, if it needed a parallax knob NF would have added one. The scope was designed and tested by people who HAVE to make their shots count and they obviously didn't think they were missing out on anything. It's definitely over engineered for somebody just knocking down deer. </div></div>

Ah... this was a wish list. Do I expect Nightforce to make this scope. Nah. Ive been around long enough to know better. I have an F1 with the MLR2. I like it, and while it may not be the Hubble "Compact" wouldn't be the first words I'd use.
 
Re: Dear Nightforce,

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Bevan</div><div class="ubbcode-body">My request seems reasonable since they actually make the fucking scope that I want them to sell to me </div></div>

grin.gif