Delta airlines bugaloo 2 yeah baby!!!!

I don’t think you guys realize how easy it is to drag a wing on those things on the ground in Strong Crosswinds. I think with the split Schimitar winglets on a 737. It’s like 6-8° of roll on landing could strike the winglet on the CRJ, It’s probably pretty similar. They are extremely low to the ground and 30 kt crosswind is no joke.

There’s absolutely nothing wrong with the CRJ. I have 3400 hours in that airplane and I’ve lived to tell about it
 
Last edited:
I don’t think you guys realize how easy it is to drag a wing on those things on the ground in Strong Crosswinds. I think with the split Schmear winglets on a 737. It’s like 68° of roll on landing could strike the winglet on the CRJ. It’s probably pretty similar. They are extremely low to the ground and 30 kt crosswind is no joke.

There’s absolutely nothing wrong with the CRJ. I have three or 4000 hours in that airplane and I’ve lived to tell about it
On the contrary, most here do realize the complexity of flying and the awful consequence that failure brings which is precisly why we believe DEI has absolutely no place whatsoever in pilot selection. They need to be the best at flying. Period. End of discussion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mosin46 and BScore
Well shit! Sitting on a Delta plane now🙄


Just another scuffed rim, I mean wing…..😳


IMG_6970.jpeg
 
Well shit! Sitting on a Delta plane now🙄

Main line Delta, or CRJ Regional? Big difference in experience in the cockpit. I agree a 30 kt crosswind with a wing that low is no joke and this probably happens more than you would guess. I use to fly DC8’s and it didn’t take much to hit an inboard engine on the ground in a strong gusty crosswind; you had to really stay on top of it. It never happened to me, but it probably happened once a year at that company. The real question is, what kind of wing spar and integrity inspection happens after such an event?
 
Main line Delta, or CRJ Regional? Big difference in experience in the cockpit. I agree a 30 kt crosswind with a wing that low is no joke and this probably happens more than you would guess. I use to fly DC8’s and it didn’t take much to hit an inboard engine on the ground in a strong gusty crosswind; you had to really stay on top of it. It never happened to me, but it probably happened once a year at that company. The real question is, what kind of wing spar and integrity inspection happens after such an event?
The DC8 was an unforgiving plane but it was awesome none the less
 
  • Like
Reactions: KYAggie
On the contrary, most here do realize the complexity of flying and the awful consequence that failure brings which is precisly why we believe DEI has absolutely no place whatsoever in pilot selection. They need to be the best at flying. Period. End of discussion.
Well, there’s no evidence in this case that DEI was involved and yes, I am absolutely against DEI. I have been a victim of it. I fly with people who are benefiting from it, but not every female or every black kid or every minority whatever is a DEI higher some of them are actually really good at what they do and deserve to be where they are Now we’ve all gotten a leg up in different ways from different people at different times so you don’t discount that but the ones that do deserve it are well recognized and the ones that are lacking in are clearly just there because of their sex race color creed whatever it’s very obvious I fly with a form of former female Thunderbird pilot all the time and she is probably the best pilot I have ever flown with
 
  • Like
Reactions: AllenOne1
The plural of anecdote is not data. “I knew a someone that…..” is a intellectually challenged argument.

DEI is a compounding error.

It’s not that women can’t be good at what they do. It’s not that there aren’t women out there who are exceptional at what they do and do it better than most men. But those are “anecdotes” in a lot of these DEI cases.

With DEI you take a group of people who are marginally qualified, and you blow smoke up their ass telling them that they shit butterflies 🦋 and fart rainbows 🌈 . You promote them instead of other man who are much more qualified, and you fast track them into positions to meet quotas.

For a lot of these male dominated positions there is an exceedingly small pool of women applying for these jobs. So you are pulling talent from a very small pool as opposed to a much larger pool of men. Mathematically that’s problematic. Mathematically, you’re going to get lower qualified candidates with DEI.

All of these things compound the error of choosing and promoting candidates -> because they have a vagina.

We see time and time again, where women have infiltrated men male dominated jobs and standards have had to be lowered for them.

Then there is the problem of them shirking accountability, and responsibility and men around them, white-knighting/covering for them.

This lady was the Colorado cop that put the prisoner in the cop car on the railroad tracks that was subsequently hit by the train. She failed two psyche evals. at least two different agencies. She was hired by two agencies in spite of this. One age agency wisely refused to hire her because she failed theirs.



IMG_4577.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: BScore
They aborted the landing, unaware that they had dragged the wing. Then they had to go around to reattempt the landing.

So they were flying all those souls on board with a damaged wing until they got it landed.
That’s how it works, unless you just decide to ditch it