I really like the VX5hd line. Wish they offered the TMOA in the vx5 line but i guess ill have bump up to the vx6 to get but really like the weight of the vx5
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The Bushnell LRHS was VERY close. A little bit different reticle and it would have been the perfect long range hunting scope.
John
Myself and Ilya have been bothering the optics Co's for years to produce "this" kind of scope.
There's always something I didn't like about the current offerings. That could be the quality being too low, the glass quality being barely acceptable, non close focus or fixed parallax, too heavy, too long, stupid reticle or just it falling short in different ways, moa mixed with mil, not illuminated or not daylight bright, or being really expensive/$4000-ish.
Those guys that are hunting from close in to 300-ish yards could use any decent standard SFP scope and be fine, that's not what this thread is about IMO! I think we want max versatility in a FFP scope made specifically for long range hunting but can be used well in almost any hunting scenario.
I/we already have dandy FFP scopes for a plethora of long range tactical, benchrest, Fclass, NRL22/rogue 22, Field Target air rifle, etc.
Just commenting here...Another scope I had that met a good amount of my qualifications was a FFP Athlon Ares BTR 2.5-15x50.
The good - It had 10Y close focus, a great .2 mil reticle, 10 mil knobs with ZS and illumination.
The bad - glass was only okay, the build quality almost acceptable, but kinda heavy and long especially for a 2.5-15x50.
I had great hopes for the Meopta Optika 6 line, but since it's release the hype has really died down.
I'm guessing it's not met expectations.
Myself and Ilya have been bothering the optics Co's for years to produce "this" kind of scope.
There's always something I didn't like about the current offerings. That could be the quality being too low, the glass quality being barely acceptable, non close focus or fixed parallax, too heavy, too long, stupid reticle or just it falling short in different ways, moa mixed with mil, not illuminated or not daylight bright, or being really expensive/$4000-ish.
Those guys that are hunting from close in to 300-ish yards could use any decent standard SFP scope and be fine, that's not what this thread is about IMO! I think we want max versatility in a FFP scope made specifically for long range hunting but can be used well in almost any hunting scenario.
I/we already have dandy FFP scopes for a plethora of long range tactical, benchrest, Fclass, NRL22/rogue 22, Field Target air rifle, etc.
Just commenting here...Another scope I had that met a good amount of my qualifications was a FFP Athlon Ares BTR 2.5-15x50.
The good - It had 10Y close focus, a great .2 mil reticle, 10 mil knobs with ZS and illumination.
The bad - glass was only okay, the build quality almost acceptable, but kinda heavy and long especially for a 2.5-15x50.
These two were close
![]()
Primary Arms SLx 3-18x50mm FFP Rifle Scope - Illuminated ACSS Athena BPR MIL Reticle
DetailsThis Primary Arms rifle scope is part of the SLx optics line. SLx optics built their reputation for innovation, reliability, and value. All SLx optics undergo rigorous field-testing during development to best serve you in any environment.The Primary Arms 3-18x50mm first focal plane...www.primaryarms.com
If they would only come in less that’s 20oz we would have some winners.
can’t comment on the PA glass but the Athlon Midas I have is pretty good glass and I imagine the Ares should be better.
I am close. I think I will finally get something done with the configuration close to what I had in mind originally.
ILya
As stated at least once, the LRHS is the best I’ve found. It checks so many boxes, leaving very little off the table. It’s misses are inconsequential as compared to the product as a whole.
It’s shocking to me that none of the other scope manufacturers have taken the LRHS and said - let’s make one like this.
LRHS is an excellent scope, so Bushnell discontinued it... Go figure.
The 4.5-18x44 is close to what I wanted, but it is a little heavier than I want. Also, for offhand shooting I really like the low power to be around 3x or lower. That having been said, the LRHS and LRTS are easily my favourite off all Bushnell scopes I have seen in the last decade or so.
ILya
A $2500 S&B Ultra Short 3-20 in 44mm with the Bushnell illuminated G2H that has .2 mil horizontal subtensions . 10 mils per rev double turn. 34 mm tube is ok. . Illumination control like "normal" Scopes. 1000 hr battery life on a CR2032. 27 0Z max. 10 yard focus ....I was all exited about the 3-12 LRHS at pre release because the original specs were for a 10Y focus, so I ordered two. When they came in they had 50Y min focus, man was I pissed off! When I called Bushnell it was a 'so sad -too bad" answer. I sold one within a few weeks and kept the other for a few years.
The other thing I didn't like which Bushnell fixed later on was the 50/100 spline, so invariably I'd end up 1 click high or low when I tried to sight in. Later they did the 100/100 spline.
Other than I wished it was a 3-15 and the reticle wasn't my flavor, I sold it because of those 3 reasons. That arrow on the top was a good idea and the glass was very nice.
A $2500 S&B Ultra Short 3-20 in 44mm with the Bushnell illuminated G2H that has .2 mil horizontal subtensions . 10 mils per rev double turn. 34 mm tube is ok. . Illumination control like "normal" Scopes. 1000 hr battery life on a CR2032. 27 0Z max. 10 yard focus ....
yes Sir i have 3 of them and only thing missing is better turret and a red dotVortex 3-15 razor hd lh with better turrets
Just make a 40-45mm version of the top tier tactical scopes, with smaller zoom ranges, and a damn capped windage.
A nice easy to get behind eye box would help too.
Lightweight, excellent glass, and the dead hold BDC reticle works pretty damn well out to 500, at least on my .264 winchester. Despite it being a 1 inch tube i've never felt hampered during low light conditions. Turrets seem to track well, but are complete mush. Improve them and I'd never look elsewhere for a hunting scope. Illumination would be the icing on the cake as you said. I snagged a nice used one to put on my remington 541S .22 rifle as well, and will continue to buy them up when a deal presents itself.yes Sir i have 3 of them and only thing missing is better turret and a red dot