Re: Die Question
All this is true, but...
Case wall length growth will result in headspace shrinking.
Until it reaches the point where chambering is affected, this is not an especially bad thing.
The issue becomes one of case wall thickness, and decreasing the number of F/L sizings may decrease the tendency of creating the dreaded internal ring-groove just above (roughly 1/4-1/2") the extraction groove and may decrease the tendency toward case head separation.
Once chambering becomes an issue, simply running the F/L die down and doing a complete F/L resizing will bump the shoulder back and restart the cycle. IMHO, anything which reduces the number of shoulder bumps is beneficial to brass life.
Another issue is that when the rearward portion of the neck remains blown out, it serves to provide a partial interference fit between the case neck and the corresponding neck portion of the chamber, which can serve to center the casing's forward portion more concentric relative to the rifling. I think this can also be beneficial to accuracy.
One of the issues of case concentricity involves how the cartidge lies in the chamber prior to ignition. All the concentricity in the world becomes academic if the case itself is lying loose in the bottom of the chamber, several thousandths below the chamber centerline.
Greg