Rifle Scopes DMRii Pro reticle

[bobke]

If you have a DMRII Pro, or have handled one., would you please confirm whether G3 reticle is narrower in 2 mils of horizontal/windage stadia and .5 mil of elevation. Website reticle simulator shows the above, but LRTS I have with G3 are same thickness in both planes. Thx.

 

[Gooldylocks]

I have no useful input for you.

But this does seem like a good thread to voice my opinion (where maybe someone with influence will see) on the lack of a good Christmas tree reticle from Bushnell.

Bushnell: start offering the Deploy FFP in the Elite Tactical line. A DMR/DMR Pro/XRS2 with that reticle would sell very well, if I were to guess.

 

[lennyo3034]

OP, I think it depends on whether the scope is illuminated or not. For the normal DMRII, only the non illuminated versions had thinner stadia lines.

FWIW, the G2/G3 reticles are some of my favorite reticles. I tend to use lower magnification than most so I prefer .5 hashes over .2.

 

[spife7980]

My understanding as well is that the illuminated models had the full width middle and the non illuminated was thinned.

I too like the g3 reticle a lot, I don’t mind the thickness of it.

That said that deploy reticle is pretty nice looking from a quick google.

 

[10APOKS]

The DMRII Pro has the standard G3 reticle with .03 mil stadia lines 2 mils from the intersect, and then .06 mil for the rest. Only the illuminated models have a steady .06 mil main stadia across the entire reticle.

-Dan

 

[lennyo3034]

Do any of you own the pro model?

I really like the basic design but never was satisfied with the glass of the Bushnell 3.5-21.

I've had the original DMR, ERS, and now DMRII. Glass is hardly any different between them despite reports saying improved glass with every iteration. I'm hesitant to try the pro for the same reasons.