I’m sitting on three currently that I’m dragging my feet on, as I still need glass for two of the three.Hah funny story/coincidence: I JUST built an upper with a VLTOR MUR and URX4.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I’m sitting on three currently that I’m dragging my feet on, as I still need glass for two of the three.Hah funny story/coincidence: I JUST built an upper with a VLTOR MUR and URX4.
They’re not available stripped, but I think the BCM Mk2 forged upper is the best of both worlds here.
^I guarantee you it’ll fit tighter than a VTLOR MUR, at 1/3 the price too. I love VLTOR MUR uppers, but never has one that’s passed through my hands been even remotely as tight as an undersized BCM.
Not quite accurate.................the BCM Mk2 is listed at around $125, but not at all available other than as a complete barreled upper group, but you can find Vltor 1a uppers for around $165-170 when they are available, so the BCM is nowhere near 1/3 the price of a Vltor.
MM
I feel you there. I’m waiting on a Vortex Gen3 for said upper and have two or three other uppers lacking glass at the moment.I’m sitting on three currently that I’m dragging my feet on, as I still need glass for two of the three.
There are a number of rail systems including some of the best like gisessle that will not work with the mk2.
BCM makes the best forged uppers. Hands down no question. 95% is the quality of machining and consistency. It’s a staple of many precision Builds and unless you are hanging a giant barrel, the added stiffness of billet is Not worth it. A forging will always be a stronger receiver, all things being equal.
What happens when you heat red loctite, it turns to liquid. What happens when you heat block loctite, nothing. We have been using blue since the late 80s when there were only 3 people building AR high power rifles.If you feel the top tier Upper is affordable, you should buy it and build on it with no hesitation.
Otherwise, squaring the receiver face, and bedding the barrel extension are good ideas. Neither is necessary to proper function; but many (myself included) consider it beneficial to accuracy.
Squaring can be done at home prior to assembly; a kit is utilized in conjunction with a hand drill, lower speed is better. I use standard coarse valve grinding compound as my abrasive, and I clean it up thoroughly afterward.
Barrel extension bedding is typically described as using Permanent (Red) Loc-Tite. I've done both of these processes, and had no problems in the process. I allowed the assembly to cure overnight. There are several varieties of Red Loc-Tite; and I assume someone will be along eventually to add that info after my post.
I performed the barrel nut seating three times to peen in the receiver threads. The nut I used had a hex profile, and I used a crowfoot wrench attachment on my ancient automotive Torque wrench to attain a final torque of 60 Ft Lb. The nut was lubed with anti-seize compound.
I was troubled by the idea that the permanent Loc-Tite would prevent me from removing the barrel. I haven't tried it and likely won't. But I also concluded that there might be an option here.
If I do this again, I will start by applying release agent to the barrel extension where it would come in content with the Loc-Tite. Let it dry completely before proceeding further. It may have no effect beyond allaying my unnecessary caution.
These were my base components, 15".
Greg
Yes they matter. A sloppy barrel fitment will lend to poor accuracy. I much prefer a jp/bcm upper that makes use of a reduced diameter to seat the barrel. These typically will require thermal fitment of the barrel to the upper locking them snuggly together.I’m looking to do a few upper builds, with top tier handguards, and Krieger barrels.
Assuming the upper receiver is mil spec, from Anderson to Noveske/BCM - will the upper receiver matter for group size or anything else?
It means a lot more than that if they truly follow the M16 technical data packageAll mil spec means is that they follow guidelines with materials and tolerance
Please tell me you're completely joking about this. And you're referring to the ones being sold currently?You know what feels worse? Buying a V7 slickside upper and realizing it’s just an Anderson with the rails machined.
no it does not, if there was any difference or improvement from one to the other in 'any' area, it would not be material and negligible at best. Buy what you likeI’m looking to do a few upper builds, with top tier handguards, and Krieger barrels.
Assuming the upper receiver is mil spec, from Anderson to Noveske/BCM - will the upper receiver matter for group size or anything else?
get ready to be pi$$edPlease tell me you're completely joking about this. And you're referring to the ones being sold currently?
I've bought two of the "lesser" uppers w/forward assist (I think they call it the M4) and both were interference fit with what to me, looks like a higher quality, smoother finish than my ADM lower they mate to. Is all their hype about the aluminum alloy being used just that, hype? Or are these made to their specifications by Anderson?
I actually contacted them on the need to lap the receiver and was told to absolutely not do that as they're trued from the factory. Both builds are sub-MOA
I'll be quite pissed if it's a standard Anderson upper with the only change being the logo and machined rail (and a 200% markup). I get there are only a few places which actually make the uppers but if additional precision machining is done, I'm ok with that. If not well....eff me.
Please tell me you're completely joking about this. And you're referring to the ones being sold currently?
I've bought two of the "lesser" uppers w/forward assist (I think they call it the M4) and both were interference fit with what to me, looks like a higher quality, smoother finish than my ADM lower they mate to. Is all their hype about the aluminum alloy being used just that, hype? Or are these made to their specifications by Anderson?
I actually contacted them on the need to lap the receiver and was told to absolutely not do that as they're trued from the factory. Both builds are sub-MOA
I'll be quite pissed if it's a standard Anderson upper with the only change being the logo and machined rail (and a 200% markup). I get there are only a few places which actually make the uppers but if additional precision machining is done, I'm ok with that. If not well....eff me.
get ready to be pi$$ed
Well damn. Have to say I'm happy with both VSeven uppers and I'm sure they contract them out to someone, either billet or forged to their specs, with their materials specification. I may have to give an Anderson upper a go if I ever decide to build something else and save a hundred and change.Not joking, but it was many years ago. Both the $55 Anderson Sport and $150 V7 lightweight uppers had the exact same machining flaw in the ejection port. I mean exactly the same size, in exactly the same place.
IMHO , this as well.All of this. A high quality upper is expensive because of QC. You're paying for that meticulous consistency which cost a lot of money on a mass produced product.
The variation of tolerance of different manufacturers is too vast: barrel extension vs. Upper Inner diameter.
From my experience, permanent bedding works better than shim. When I bedded my AR barrel, I'd see random "consistency" of upper inner diameter. Sometime they're tight in the front toward index pin. Sometime they're tight toward the back toward feed ramp.
The last time I bought a Noveske Gen1 upper was when John was still alive. Not sure about their quality now. I'd assume that it's still good to go.
If you have a Noveske rail then I would get a matching Noveske upper. It costs may be $20 more than the new BCM upper. Choose which roll mark you prefers.
Either way, you wont be disappointed. Lots of good recommendation in this thread.