There were several mentions of guys using too short of a bipod in the Alaska precision training classes specifically that the 6-9 was too short and the 9-13 on higher settings provided a better shooting position. Is there more context to the statements because it seems strange and uncomfortable to me? I'm wondering if the comments were mainly based on physical limitations of the shooters? Possibly their equipment?
I've never had any formal training so maybe I just started off with bad habits? My prone shooting is mostly in the PRS game and normally have my 6-9 on the lowest setting for anything inside 600 or so yards. I obviously need to extend the legs for longer distances, if the targets are elevated from the shooting position, shooting from a down sloping position... but I rarely have the legs fully extended unless it is a combination of the exceptions. The high prone and super high prone positions get uncomfortable real quick for me.
Thanks and keep the podcasts going!
I've never had any formal training so maybe I just started off with bad habits? My prone shooting is mostly in the PRS game and normally have my 6-9 on the lowest setting for anything inside 600 or so yards. I obviously need to extend the legs for longer distances, if the targets are elevated from the shooting position, shooting from a down sloping position... but I rarely have the legs fully extended unless it is a combination of the exceptions. The high prone and super high prone positions get uncomfortable real quick for me.
Thanks and keep the podcasts going!